My oh my where have we heard all this before?
ND once again spewing rhetoric, but what really irks is the way he does so as if whats he's saying is gospel.
I'll go over the holes in your statement one last time.
Yates chest is poorly shaped compared to ronnies. Poor inner attachment and hardly a striation in sight (i dont give a rats ass if striations are genetic, they still add to the impressiveness. By the same token i could argue calves are largely genetic and defend ronnie. It works both ways chichi).
His quads are badly shaped. It goes far beyond lack of upper thigh detail. The lack of muscular separation on the lower quad you can't overlook. Its as if muscles are missing. (And i thought it was only his biceps that had done a runner. 
)
Biceps good? Compared to what. Yours? Second to dickerson, theyre the worst any mr o has every had. Zero peak, no separation, and lacking in size. In every top six dorian was in his biceps were the worst. How can you say they're good?
His triceps are good. But lets not get too magnanimous here. Levrone, oliva, fedorov, demayo, munzer, priest, dillet, mentzer, bannout, titus. Their triceps warrant the use of the word "fantastic". Yates by no stretch of the imagination belongs in that list.
As for the mandatories we can argue all day as we have. But whats the point in arguing with one such as you, who thinks dorian wins each and every one of them.
We can go tit-for-tat on on oddly shaped parts all day and in the end it leads us back to where we began ( no where
)
lets entertain Ronnie's chest is so far ahead of Dorian's , he has bitch-tits this alone negates any advantage what so ever
and again entertaining your fantasy that Ronnie's chest is so far ahead of Dorians it does nothing for him in the sidechest shot . from head to toe Dorian outclasses Ronnie in this shot . Ronnie
himself said " Dorian has the best side chest shot " so this is another case of the parts NOT adding up to the superior whole.
Coleman's calves - oddly shaped and a total lack of professional level development & detail nevermind Olympia level.
Coleman's abdominals - oddly shaped 4 pack that lack crisp detail
Coleman's forearms - shaped like a bowling pin lack proportion in relation to his biceps/triceps
Coleman's glutes - I know you guys salivate over them but they are oddly shaped especially when then can be seen from the front and stick way out from the back.
And to try and use more striations as an edge ( while dilberatly ignoring bitch-tits ) in who has the better chest and then say ' well its genetic ' so Ronnie gets a pass on his flaws using your logic so does Dorian , so having a wider waist is genetic so Dorian is excuses , not having hi-peaked biceps is genetic so he's excused , do you see how absurd that is?
As far as the mandatories are concerned I don't think Dorian would win all of them just most of them
Front & rear latspreads
side chest & triceps
abdominal & thigh
front & back double biceps are debateable ! and I liked your critique of Dorian's 'flaws ' because it proves my point , Dorian outright beat many , many men who better parts . better taper , better x-frames etc , you ever wonder why? lol because he had the edge in muscular density , balance , bulk and conditioning
combined and he would still have those again Ronnie 98/99
