ND, you are getting sad. You damn well know that Ronnie would have kicked Dorian's ass in 1998. Dorian was gifted 1997, much like many bodybuilders who present a good physique at one time are given the benefit of the doubt and given a higher placing than they deserve. To even deny that a 1998 Ronnie would not annihilate a 1998 Dorian totally invalidates you. Even Sucky, the most ardent Dorian nuthugger the world has ever seen, can see this. Moreover, to say that Dorian's loss to Haney was because he was not at his best is laughable. In 1992, he presented the same damn package and would have gotten second again to Haney. In 1993, he was 257 or so and had put on fifteen pounds of very impressive muscle. This was his pinnacle; his ultimate condition. Forever after, he was a shell of his former self. In 1994, he tore his biceps and came in out of shape. In 1995, he was hard and conditioned, but his proportions and aesthetics sucked. In 1996 and 1997, we won't even go there. He looked like total cacka in 1997. His arms were pathetic, his conditioning made Ronnie 2001 look like Munzer. His waist was large and blocky. He was 270 pounds of shit. Anyone who thinks he could have beaten Ronnie in 1998 in a fairly judged contest is asinine, insane, or exceedingly biased. I think you have proven yourself to possess all three of these characteristics. Being a health care professional, it is my professional duty to inform you that you need eye glasses and psychiatric therapy as you are completely deluded. This thread has become a complete joke when you argue Dorian circa 1997/1998 to Ronnie 1998/1999. At least be sane and admit you need to compare Dorian circa 1992/1993 to an alltime best Ronnie.
