Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3524920 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6350 on: July 16, 2006, 03:07:33 PM »
Ronnie's waist and taper at the AC:



More of Ronnie's waist and taper at the AC:

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6351 on: July 16, 2006, 03:09:52 PM »
Hulkster you ever consider that at 247lbs his latspread might not be as great as you think it is?


no. Ronnie's lats were insane when you combine his lats with his tiny waist.
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6352 on: July 16, 2006, 03:12:14 PM »
Ronnie's midsection at the AC:


check out the unreal pecs. (yates does NOT have a better chest than this)

and note the quads too! :o


from the knees up he is perfection!

Why does Ronnie chest get falt as a pancake when he does the front double biceps pose? no one is claiming Yates quads are better than Ronnie just better than you give him credit for .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6353 on: July 16, 2006, 03:19:56 PM »

no. Ronnie's lats were insane when you combine his lats with his tiny waist.

I don't think his lats are that dramatic at that weight his taper helps with the illusion his back doesn't look any wider than Chris or Dennis

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6354 on: July 16, 2006, 03:23:27 PM »
Quote
Why does Ronnie chest get falt as a pancake when he does the front double biceps pose?

Hard to say. But it is certainly not from lack of development or thickness:






thick as hell, and superdeveloped
Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6355 on: July 16, 2006, 03:24:30 PM »
In my opinion Flex wins here....notice the much more deeply cut quads, more striations in the chest, smaller waist, much more defined midsection....




Flex's lat spread still wins

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6356 on: July 16, 2006, 03:30:39 PM »
Hard to say. But it is certainly not from lack of development or thickness:


thick as hell, and superdeveloped

I never said it wasn't thick & or developed I just think its odd even when he's 296lbs his pecs go flat .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6357 on: July 16, 2006, 03:33:25 PM »
ND:

Discuss the respective tapers of Ronnie and Dorian and who wins in that area.

At the same weight Ronnie , no doubt .

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6358 on: July 16, 2006, 04:32:22 PM »
Flex's lat spread still wins

Who cares about one pose? This thread isn't even about Ronnie vs Flex. If you want to know why Flex would never beat a prime Ronnie, look no further.





pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6359 on: July 16, 2006, 04:37:32 PM »
Who cares about one pose?




I care. Now go pick your nose or something

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6360 on: July 16, 2006, 05:48:21 PM »
ND, I admit that the black and white double bi pose of Dorian is impressive, but the lighting and picture type helped.  In a contest front double bi, Coleman eats his lunch.  Yates chest is not exactly popping out at you in this pic (and I believe it is pre-tear).  Regardless, lighting always can help you look better.  Look at the 1992 pre-Olympia pics of Coleman and then the shape he turned up in at the show.  Talk about missing your peak.  Regardless, Dorian never brought a package on stage was as large (muscularity wise) as his B&W pics.


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83642
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6361 on: July 16, 2006, 06:00:09 PM »
ND, I admit that the black and white double bi pose of Dorian is impressive, but the lighting and picture type helped.  In a contest front double bi, Coleman eats his lunch.  Yates chest is not exactly popping out at you in this pic (and I believe it is pre-tear).  Regardless, lighting always can help you look better.  Look at the 1992 pre-Olympia pics of Coleman and then the shape he turned up in at the show.  Talk about missing your peak.  Regardless, Dorian never brought a package on stage was as large (muscularity wise) as his B&W pics.



Actually he was 257lbs in 93 so that wasn't to far off from the B&Ws which he was 269lbs and in 1997 he was over 270lbs but didn't look anywhere near as good as the B&Ws and the shot you posted was from the 93 Olympia and you can notice Yates' chest thickness moreso than Ronnie whos chest goes flat .

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6362 on: July 16, 2006, 06:40:49 PM »
Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: pobrecito on Today at 04:16:39 PM
In my opinion Flex wins here....notice the much more deeply cut quads, more striations in the chest, smaller waist, much more defined midsection....


You've just compromised your objectivity by first complaining about the level of quality of pics used for comparisons, then turning around and using pics that are like day and night re: background, shading, direct vs. indirect lighting, etc.

One of the worst possible comparisons.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6363 on: July 16, 2006, 06:50:58 PM »
Its not like he had a whole lot of options, when comparing 93 flex to 2001 asc ronnie.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6364 on: July 16, 2006, 07:05:27 PM »

You've just compromised your objectivity by first complaining about the level of quality of pics used for comparisons, then turning around and using pics that are like day and night re: background, shading, direct vs. indirect lighting, etc.

One of the worst possible comparisons.


let me in on something Hulkster has been trying to let ND know....lighting does not magically make deeply cut quads and striations appear. Dorian clearly has striations in his chest, but better lighting will exaggerate it more.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6365 on: July 16, 2006, 07:24:31 PM »
Coleman's hamstrings are unbelievable here


pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6366 on: July 16, 2006, 07:25:29 PM »
But his midsection still sucks, and for that reason Dorian would slaughter Coleman in the Ab-Calf 8)


Big N

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5564
  • Veteran Fella
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6367 on: July 16, 2006, 07:26:39 PM »
seriously this fucking thread man, what is up with it? Wow


LOCK IT!  >:(
#

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6368 on: July 16, 2006, 07:29:16 PM »
The best ab-thigh of all time 8)



quote Flex before doing a set of leg press:

"let me show you how to get some of these big thirty-two and a halfs.....of course that's coupled to a 28" waist"
 8)

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6369 on: July 16, 2006, 08:44:17 PM »
ND, although I do prefer Ronnie, I agree that Dorian did have a very powerful looking physique.  It did pop, although I do feel the lack of good arms hurt him greatly.  In 1993, the man looked great.  It would have been an epic battle if Ronnie 1998/1999 faced off against Yates 1993 in a legit, unbiased show; I feel it would get major PPV bucks.  I know you disagree, but I feel that Ronnie (sans the gut) looked amazingly powerful in 2003; most muscular presentation ever on stage by anyone.  Nobody touched him.  I think he barely had to step out of the line up it was so cut and dry.  I really need to get to a show (been a couple of years) as the guys are getting insanely huge.  BTW, the orangutan was not really Doz; that was Ernie Taylor. Peace all.  ;D

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6370 on: July 16, 2006, 08:45:01 PM »

look how thick Ronnie's back is :o


makes dorian's look flat as a pancake.

and yet the dorian nut hugger's claim Yates back was thicker at the same weight.

I think not.
Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6371 on: July 16, 2006, 08:50:39 PM »
But his midsection still sucks, and for that reason Dorian would slaughter Coleman in the Ab-Calf 8)



Respond to this Hulkster 8)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6372 on: July 16, 2006, 08:56:29 PM »
Respond to this Hulkster 8)

his midsection was not that bad at the AC:


as you can see here, he had decent looking abs from the front combined with a micro-waist.

And his thighs killed Dorian's.

I am not saying that Ronnie would necessarily win the ab pose, but it would not be as much of a landslide victory for Yates,

You have to remember this:

the judges clearly put a lot of emphasis on the QUADS in the pose (eg. ronnie beating dexter). And we all know Ronnie's quads are vastly superior to Dorian's.

Whos to say the same would not happen against Dorian?
Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6373 on: July 16, 2006, 09:14:12 PM »
his midsection was not that bad at the AC:


as you can see here, he had decent looking abs from the front combined with a micro-waist.

And his thighs killed Dorian's.

I am not saying that Ronnie would necessarily win the ab pose, but it would not be as much of a landslide victory for Yates,

You have to remember this:

the judges clearly put a lot of emphasis on the QUADS in the pose (eg. ronnie beating dexter). And we all know Ronnie's quads are vastly superior to Dorian's.

Whos to say the same would not happen against Dorian?


I agree with you 100% on the quad issue...Dorian's quads have horrible, weird shape, weak separation, and no striations. BUT, I feel that Dorian's midsection is SO much better that he would still win the pose. Unlike Dexter, Dorian actually has the size to compete with Coleman.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #6374 on: July 16, 2006, 11:08:22 PM »
why? I don't. Its just that there are not that many.

seriously.

For example, there TWO shots where his back double bi looks like it should (ie the top few best in the world)

And there are MANY where it does not (eg. the shot I just posted, the shot from the 96 O. etc etc).


other than calves, lats and abs, the man was nothing special from the front.

he never deserved to beat this (esp. when you consider that Flex had a better back double bi- at least from the waist up)


and he would never beat this, again considering not only is the rear double bi probably better, he has width as well:


All of those shots with Dorian dominating Kevin and Nasser only show one thing: yates would get killed by Ronnie.

All of those great shot from 1993 show one thing: It is very questionable that yates deserved to beat Flex that night.

The judges were blinded by size and width.

The quality of flex was greater than Dorians that night.

Just as the quality of Ronnie would be the same.



  No good shots of Dorian, Huckster? No problem: I'll give some to you. How abot these? ;) 8)

SUCKMYMUSCLE