He continues to say whatever's necessary to try to deflect. Nothing new-won't address the causes while admitting there have been some obvious problems.
Start justifying some of the most obvious pathetic decisions that you've admitted yourself, or accept that without any adquate explanations there's truth to them. Can't have it both ways.
No no you can't have it both ways , you can't say the Weiders handpicked Yates to win in 94/97 and then in the same breath have the balls to say Ronnie won fair & square in 01/02 , when according to the people who matter , the judges 94/97 were NO WHERE near as close on their scorecards as 01/02 , the judges know more than pumpster .
you base contest results on your own personal feelings & preferences , you say Flex should have beat Dorian . WRONG . I'm a big Flex fan but he wasn't good enough in 93 and the other times they met he was off , so your motivation for saying Haney & Yates were gifted comes out of personal preference and bias , just because pumpster doesn't get doesn't mean Haney & Yates shouldn't have won . the judges know more than you.