Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

Shame he didnt write the book on how to combine size with detail, shape and aesthetics.

Actually what about his best book to date: "How to train safely and remain injury free throughout your career"

You're sadly mistaken if you think Coleman is aesthetic , he may be more so than Dorian but lets not act like Ronnie is Cormier or Bob Paris.

[pumpster]

The only DIFFERENCE is conditioning and maybe better lighting

Hypocrite ND has trotted out the signifigance of Yates' conditioning & lighting advantages at least 73 times! And BTW Coleman does look sharper in that other pic.

OWNED

[NarcissisticDeity]

Hypocrite ND has trotted out the signifigance of Yates' conditioning & lighting advantages at least 73 times! And BTW Coleman does look sharper in that other pic.

OWNED

LMFAO@owned what? how am I a hypocrite? I said the only difference between Ronnie 96/97 was conditioning and the lighting is better. there is NO major significant difference between Ronnie 1996/97 and 1998/99 other than conditioning. he still had his great taper , his wide back , his tint waist , his great quadsweep , and he was 250lbs in 96 and 255lbs in 1997 .

[pumpster]

In that case there's no difference here either..

[NarcissisticDeity]

In that case there's no difference here either..

Ummmmm WRONG yet again  he's 270lbs in 1997 and 255lbs in 1995 that for the mentally challenged ( you ) is a 15lb advantage. and from a conditioning standpoint there is almost NO difference , he was perhaps just a tad sharper in 95 and his tricep wasn't torn. so nice try but maybe next time sport. 

[pumpster]

he's 270lbs in 1997 and 255lbs in 1995 that for the mentally challenged ( you ) is a 15lb advantage. and from a conditioning standpoint there is almost NO difference , he was perhaps just a tad sharper in 95

Iron Age turd boy again obfuscating with numbers. Point stands, he's a hypocrite. Can't question the importance of conditioning & lighting for Coleman while rattling on and on how important that was for Yates. OWNED

[sculpture]

Iron Age turd boy again obfuscating with numbers. Point stands, he's a hypocrite. Can't question the importance of conditioning & lighting for Coleman while rattling on and on how important that was for Yates. OWNED

I wouldnt bother with him. He 's really acting like a prat today .

Once again, an over emphasis on numbers means little in the light of visual evidence such as this.

Despite a neglible change in bodyweight, the difference in the front double bicep shot between 96 and 97 when compared to the 98 shot is unbelievable.

Staggering infact. Like Hulkster said, he was literally embryonic in the early 90's .

And then there's ND claiming the only change ronnie made between 96 and 98 was conditioning

[img]

[sculpture]

Ummmmm WRONG yet again  he's 270lbs in 1997 and 255lbs in 1995 that for the mentally challenged ( you ) is a 15lb advantage. and from a conditioning standpoint there is almost NO difference , he was perhaps just a tad sharper in 95 and his tricep wasn't torn. so nice try but maybe next time sport. 

Please tell me thats not all you think that was different from 95 and 97.

What about the wider waist? 15 lbs of muscle added yes, unfortunatly not evenly distributed on his body - the majority in his midsection probably. Less quad flair, wider waist, bigger gut, aged 10 years in two.

He looked dreadful

[FREAKgeek]

good pic. That should make ND change the topic

[NarcissisticDeity]

I wouldnt bother with him. He 's really acting like a prat today .

Once again, an over emphasis on numbers means little in the light of visual evidence such as this.

Despite a neglible change in bodyweight, the difference in the front double bicep shot between 96 and 97 when compared to the 98 shot is unbelievable.

Staggering infact. Like Hulkster said, he was literally embryonic in the early 90's .

And then there's ND claiming the only change ronnie made between 96 and 98 was conditioning

[img]

Let me get this straight lol he's 255lbs in 1997 and 249lbs in 1998 and he's bigger even though he's lighter? lol get serious ! his quads all the sudden from one year to the next blow up yet he's lighter , his back gets wider despite being 6lbs lighter? 

look Ronnie 94/95 was light compared to 96/97 but 96/97 he was 250/255lbs I don't care what you're suggesting but he's not going to get smaller and be bigger , he may appear bigger but he's not the only major difference between 97/98 is conditioning.

[sculpture]

Let me get this straight lol he's 255lbs in 1997 and 249lbs in 1998 and he's bigger even though he's lighter? lol get serious ! his quads all the sudden from one year to the next blow up yet he's lighter , his back gets wider despite being 6lbs lighter? 

look Ronnie 94/95 was light compared to 96/97 but 96/97 he was 250/255lbs I don't care what you're suggesting but he's not going to get smaller and be bigger , he may appear bigger but he's not the only major difference between 97/98 is conditioning.

In the face of mounting visual evidence to the contrary, you truly are now beyond help.

Anyone, and i mean anyone can see from the transition pics from 96 to 98 that ronnie underwent an incredible transformation.

Open yours eyes man.

Just admit for once that you're wrong.

Dead wrong in this instance.

Conditioning cannot explain the differences in those shots. Look at the legs in 98, fuckin outstanding and far better than your boy pork yates ever displayed.

[NarcissisticDeity]

In the face of mounting visual evidence to the contrary, you truly are now beyond help.

Anyone, and i mean anyone can see from the transition pics from 96 to 98 that ronnie underwent an incredible transformation.

Open yours eyes man.

Just admit for once that you're wrong.

Dead wrong in this instance.

Conditioning cannot explain the differences in those shots. Look at the legs in 98, fuckin outstanding and far better than your boy pork yates ever displayed.

That picture shows his conditioning was much improved. what do you think takes place? he loses size and his biceps go from 22" to 24" ? you think his chest measurement goes from 55" to 60" while getting smaller? what Universe are you living in? his quads go from 31' to 33" ? now let me get this straight he loses 5lbs and gets bigger everywhere lol please tell me you don't believe that?

[sculpture]

ND for one minute shut up and LOOK at the pictures.

If a difference in conditioning is all you see then you need glasses.

Maybe, juts maybe for one minute you should start questioning the validity of those weights you so often quote as if gospel

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND for one minute shut up and LOOK at the pictures.

If a difference in conditioning is all you see then you need glasses.

Maybe, juts maybe for one minute you should start questioning the validity of those weights you so often quote as if gospel

I've looked at those pictures , you ever thing they're not 100% accurate? use some logic for change. everything doesn't get BIGGER & WIDER when you lose size this is a fact my friend .

[sculpture]

Heres the difference:

The pictures don't lie.

People do.

A bodybuilder exaggerating his weight. Hmmmmm, i've never heard of that before.

Unless you were at the scales when he was getting weighed and suggest you stop luxuriating in the false belief that theyre infallible

[NarcissisticDeity]

Heres the difference:

The pictures don't lie.

People do.

A bodybuilder exaggerating his weight. Hmmmmm, i've never heard of that before.

Unless you were at the scales when he was getting weighed and suggest you stop luxuriating in the false belief that theyre infallible

Stop creating excuses for Coleman . pictures don't lie  pictures can be very decieving just look at the ones Neoseminole posted , he claims they're accuratly scaled because the top of the heads almost match yet Dorian's waist is the same size as Ronnies and Coleman's calves are bigger lol yeah pic don't lie.  get serious.

[pumpster]

ND for one minute shut up and LOOK at the pictures.

If a difference in conditioning is all you see then you need glasses.

Why, he thinks the debate is more important than reality, looking might interfere with that.

[sculpture]

Stop creating excuses for Coleman . pictures don't lie  pictures can be very decieving just look at the ones Neoseminole posted , he claims they're accuratly scaled because the top of the heads almost match yet Dorian's waist is the same size as Ronnies and Coleman's calves are bigger lol yeah pic don't lie.  get serious.

Yes we've all seen your credentials as far as scaling pictures is concerned

[NarcissisticDeity]

Yes we've all seen your credentials as far as scaling pictures is concerned

No you haven't  lol nice try but not good enough. I never scaled any pictures. I've posted some but didn't scale them. you have to be sharper than that slick.

[sculpture]

Why, he thinks the debate is more important than reality, looking might interfere with that.

Come on thats low. So what if this thread is his life.  

[NarcissisticDeity]

Come on thats low. So what if this thread is his life.  

What ironic is you're all complicit in this tread yet go on about how pathetic I am? lol typical Coleman fans all hypocrites lol and read the very first post of this thread I was comfortable in my opinion to call a truce and I was thinking of fellow members that very thoughtfull of me I might add . pot don't call the kettle black.

[sculpture]

What ironic is you're all complicit in this tread yet go on about how pathetic I am? lol typical Coleman fans all hypocrites lol and read the very first post of this thread I was comfortable in my opinion to call a truce and I was thinking of fellow members that very thoughtfull of me I might add . pot don't call the kettle black.

Bollocks. The motive of this thread was attention whoring and that alone.

If you were trying to appear magnaminous and doin all this for the good of the board then i'm sorry to say but on both counts you failed miserably.

Maybe you could of been even more "thoughtful" and not actually debated in this thread, sticking true to your guns, but hey, you didnt and here we are 311 pages later still trying to get the message through to you.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Bollocks. The motive of this thread was attention whoring and that alone.

If you were trying to appear magnaminous and doin all this for the good of the board then i'm sorry to say but on both counts you failed miserably.

Maybe you could of been even more "thoughtful" and not actually debated in this thread, sticking true to your guns, but hey, you didnt and here we are 311 pages later still trying to get the message through to you.

Please don't presume to speak of my intentions. I'm no post whore thank you ! I had a little over 3000 posts a over a year on GetBig and I know pleanty of guys who have that in 2 months , so you're wrong again !! I honestly believed this thread would have been two pages and Hulkster wasn't secure in his opinion so we went tit-for-tat but anyway please don't act like any better than me because you're just as guilty in this thread.

[pumpster]

The motive of this thread was attention whoring and that alone.

Of course. For this he also uses a cyber-soapbox.

Grandstanding = no content = endless, vacuous, perpetually circular rhetoric = pap.

Something tells me he was part of the debating society in high school - the issue under debate's virtually irrelevant.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Of course. For this he also uses a cyber-soapbox.

Grandstanding = no content = endless, vacuous, perpetually circular rhetoric = pap.

Something tells me he was part of the debating society in high school - the issue under debate's virtually irrelevant.

Lets debate some of your fine points shall we? lol like exactly how Ronnie can compensate size-wise for his gut despite being 23lbs lighter.