Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3516185 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8950 on: September 14, 2006, 09:07:44 PM »
Quote
The only thing Ronnie has on Dorian, in this pic I posted, are biceps...by a slim margin.

a slim margin?





that has never happened. it was always by a WIDE margin.
 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8951 on: September 14, 2006, 09:09:03 PM »
Desperate, SUCKY reverts again to the inevitable side-tri shots, Yates' ONLY good triceps shot...hahahaahahahahaha ah

Take a good look - Yates never had that combo of mass and cuts. :o :o

  I can say the same about Ronnie's calves: not nearly as massive or cut as Dorian's. As for the triceps, your argument is pathetic, because the 1993 or 1995 Dorians clearly surpass the 1999 Ronnie both in mass and shape. You asked for an overhead shot and I gave you one, clearly showing how massive Dorian's triceps were; out of spite, you criticized it for being an abs-and-thighs shot. Well, the joke's on you, because you've still failed to show a single side triceps shot - the only place where the trieps are judged on their own - where Ronnie is a match for Dorian. You failed.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8952 on: September 14, 2006, 09:12:05 PM »
Quote
Well, the joke's on you, because you've still failed to show a single side triceps shot - the only place where the trieps are judged on their own - where Ronnie is a match for Ronnie.

yes we have - watch the 99 olympia video.

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8953 on: September 14, 2006, 09:15:58 PM »
His triceps look very thick in this shot.

that shot is amazing :o

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8954 on: September 14, 2006, 09:17:51 PM »
yes we have - watch the 99 olympia video.



 Watch Dorian doing the side triceps at the 1995 Olympia. Best side triceps shot ever. Ronnie has never compared to that. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8955 on: September 14, 2006, 09:20:10 PM »
Did dorian's head get bigger?

And who has the bigger head, dorian or ronnie ???

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8956 on: September 14, 2006, 09:21:22 PM »
damn that is ugly.
dorian needs to get some aesthetics man

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8957 on: September 14, 2006, 09:23:02 PM »
Dorian does win the side tri....Coleman hits it weird, plus Yates sticks out his calf yet another advantage. THat's one of the few mandatories Yates would beat Coleman in.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8958 on: September 14, 2006, 11:13:50 PM »
Sucky, all you can do is post shots of Dorian hitting a side triceps pose. I'm still waiting for you to find me pics where Dorian's triceps look good in any other mandatory.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8959 on: September 14, 2006, 11:14:35 PM »



better arms- hahahahaha
Flower Boy Ran Away

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8960 on: September 14, 2006, 11:22:45 PM »
How about this? This shows Dorian's triceps to be incredibly massive on an overhead shot, while doing the abs-and-thighs mandatory. This pic is from the 1997 Olympia, when Dorian was far beneath his best.

What triceps? Face it, the only pose Dorian's triceps looked good is the side triceps.





arms overhead comparison




NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8961 on: September 14, 2006, 11:33:28 PM »
The only thing Ronnie has on Dorian, in this pic I posted, are biceps...by a slim margin.

Further proof why Sucky is a dipshit. Even Lee Labrada owned Dorian in biceps.



Labrada isn't even in the top 100 for best biceps. What in the hell makes him think Dorian loses out to Ronnie in biceps by just a "slim margin?"


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8962 on: September 14, 2006, 11:52:55 PM »
I'm still waiting for a side trieps shot of Ronnie that can compare to this.





suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8963 on: September 15, 2006, 12:54:49 AM »
Sucky, all you can do is post shots of Dorian hitting a side triceps pose. I'm still waiting for you to find me pics where Dorian's triceps look good in any other mandatory.

  And in what other mandatory are the triceps visible, you moron? The front double biceps? No.This pose only shows the inner part of the triceps, so it's not an ideal shot. Rear lat spread? Only the back side of it. Back double biceps? Yes, and I've already posted a pic of Dorian destroying Coleman in triceps mass and cuts there. Front lat spread? No: the triceps are not visible. Abs-and-thighs? Well, I did post a pic of Dorian hitting this shot where his triceps are pretty fucking massive, but this shot doesen't showcase the triceps well either. Side chest? Well, the triceps are visible in this mandatory, but they're not flexing, so it's not an ideal pose to show triceps development. So, you have no point. Face it: at the only mandatory created exclusively to show the triceps, Dorian destroys your boy. Game over.  ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8964 on: September 15, 2006, 12:59:13 AM »
What triceps? Face it, the only pose Dorian's triceps looked good is the side triceps.



  Ok, here's another overhead shot, where his triceps are massive. And although his taper is not that good, his midsection is vastly superior to Ronnie's, with an etched six-pack and serratus. In the second pic, Dorian is showcasing massive triceps and very good biceps. You lose. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8965 on: September 15, 2006, 01:01:53 AM »





  Nope, sorry. That side triceps shot of Dorian, from the 1995 Olympia, is the best of any Mr.Olympia ever. Not even the 2003 Ronnie, who outweighs him by 30 lbs, can compare. :o ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8966 on: September 15, 2006, 01:07:57 AM »
Further proof why Sucky is a dipshit. Even Lee Labrada owned Dorian in biceps.


  I never said Dorian's biceps were great, jackass. I only said they were very good considering that it was his weakest bodypart. Dorian's biceps were certainly superior to Ronnie's calves. ;D ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8967 on: September 15, 2006, 01:33:59 AM »
And in what other mandatory are the triceps visible, you moron? The front double biceps? No.This pose only shows the inner part of the triceps, so it's not an ideal shot. Rear lat spread? Only the back side of it. Back double biceps? Yes, and I've already posted a pic of Dorian destroying Coleman in triceps mass and cuts there. Front lat spread? No: the triceps are not visible. Abs-and-thighs? Well, I did post a pic of Dorian hitting this shot where his triceps are pretty fucking massive, but this shot doesen't showcase the triceps well either. Side chest? Well, the triceps are visible in this mandatory, but they're not flexing, so it's not an ideal pose to show triceps development. So, you have no point. Face it: at the only mandatory created exclusively to show the triceps, Dorian destroys your boy. Game over.

Ha ha ha, excuses why Dorian's triceps only looked good in the side triceps. Ronnie's triceps look good in every mandatory pose.














NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8968 on: September 15, 2006, 01:48:16 AM »
Nope, sorry. That side triceps shot of Dorian, from the 1995 Olympia, is the best of any Mr.Olympia ever. Not even the 2003 Ronnie, who outweighs him by 30 lbs, can compare.

Nope, sorry. Ronnie's side tri pose in 03 was just as good, if not better, than Dorian's. Ronnie had thicker pecs from top to bottom. Dorian's lower pecs overpowerd his upper. He always looked like he had tits when he hit this pose. Ronnie's triceps were just as large as Dorian's and had striations. Dorian never had striated triceps. Ronnie had deeper separations in his quads and his hamstrings were striated. He also had a 20 lb weight advantage.




NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8969 on: September 15, 2006, 01:57:08 AM »
I never said Dorian's biceps were great, jackass. I only said they were very good considering that it was his weakest bodypart.

<<cough>> bullshit <<cough>>

The only thing Ronnie has on Dorian, in this pic I posted, are biceps...by a slim margin.

The fact you even suggested Dorian's biceps are comparable to Ronnie's (in a rear double biceps!) proves you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8970 on: September 15, 2006, 07:46:45 AM »
Yates' arms overall are smallish, not just bis, but look great in the side shot because of extraordinary cuts, separation and dryness on the medial/lateral outer heads.

Quote
You asked for an overhead shot and I gave you one, clearly showing how massive Dorian's triceps were
This only shows that he had a great washboard-no tri size there!

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8971 on: September 15, 2006, 07:48:10 AM »
Stare until you comprehend the difference SUCKY. Yates has smallish arms, bis AND tris, with excellent cuts on tris that destract from the inadequacies. YOU ARE MY DOG.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83340
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8972 on: September 15, 2006, 10:11:53 AM »
exactly. ND and co. have never been known for their reasoning abilities :)

What do you know ? you're just an internet-fan-boy  ;)

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8973 on: September 15, 2006, 12:27:14 PM »
This thread WILL make 400 pages.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #8974 on: September 15, 2006, 12:35:49 PM »
Quote
What do you know ? you're just an internet-fan-boy
That's always funny, even the 10th time, coming from Iron Age turd-boy. :D