If someone had never seen Dorian Yates, and just looked at the score sheets, they would think "wow, this guy must be amazing!"
He must have a wicked taper, striations everywhere! Great arms, fanatastic quads! etc etc...
then you look at the pics, here winning with a PERFECT SCORE in 1995:


and you think, WHAT THE FU
CK?
and you tell me that the judging was not flawed

ND why do you place so much empahsis on the scores when the whole philosophy behind them (size over quality) was
wrong in the first place??