Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3507107 times)

the shadow · « **Reply #10775 on:** October 28, 2006, 09:49:25 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 27, 2006, 06:49:23 PM

exactly, I personally think Ronnie was dryer in 98/99 but his back was still pretty sharp in 03. ND just posted a horrible shot.

insane glutes and hams...awesome

pumpster · « **Reply #10776 on:** October 28, 2006, 09:55:06 AM »

Quote

There seems to be a trend towards Ronnie fans to be retarded

Consider the source.

pobrecito · « **Reply #10777 on:** October 28, 2006, 10:17:26 AM »

pobrecito · « **Reply #10778 on:** October 28, 2006, 10:19:28 AM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #10779 on:** October 28, 2006, 10:27:57 AM »

pobrecito · « **Reply #10780 on:** October 28, 2006, 10:30:33 AM »

That's a good shot from 98

carvedoutofwood · « **Reply #10781 on:** October 28, 2006, 10:54:54 AM »

Quote from: pobrecito on October 28, 2006, 10:30:33 AM

That's a good shot from 98

seriously .... ronnie is crazy

pobrecito · « **Reply #10782 on:** October 28, 2006, 11:08:52 AM »

There will be someone else who comes along though that will surpass Coleman....will have all the qualities of Ronnie with an awesome midsection and awesome calves.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10783 on:** October 28, 2006, 12:06:50 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on October 28, 2006, 11:08:52 AM

There will be someone else who comes along though that will surpass Coleman....will have all the qualities of Ronnie with an awesome midsection and awesome calves.

We'll see. It's theoretically possible for someone to surpass Ronnie. However, the odds are extremely low. You would need someone with better genetics than Ronnie. That limits the field of potential successors down to less than .00001% of the population. Next, they would have to start bodybuilding. What good is having better genetics if they don't get into bodybuilding? The percentage of people who are bodybuilders is less than 1% of the popluation. Finally, he would also have to stay in bodybuilding long enough. There's no guarantee that he will be injury-free or not quit for some other reason. I'm not sure what the odds of this are.

pobrecito · « **Reply #10784 on:** October 28, 2006, 12:24:14 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 28, 2006, 12:06:50 PM

We'll see. It's theoretically possible for someone to surpass Ronnie. However, the odds are extremely low. You would need someone with better genetics than Ronnie. That limits the field of potential successors down to less than .00001% of the population. Next, they would have to start bodybuilding. What good is having better genetics if they don't get into bodybuilding? The percentage of people who are bodybuilders is less than 1% of the popluation. Finally, he would also have to stay in bodybuilding long enough. There's no guarantee that he will be injury-free or not quit for some other reason. I'm not sure what the odds of this are.

Ronnie never had the best genetics in BB though. If Dillet had the drive and work ethic of Coleman he would have been the best ever. He had a great midsection and calves just like dorian!

Hulkster · « **Reply #10785 on:** October 28, 2006, 12:42:25 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on October 28, 2006, 12:24:14 PM

Ronnie never had the best genetics in BB though. If Dillet had the drive and work ethic of Coleman he would have been the best ever. He had a great midsection and calves just like dorian!

true, but the question is: had he trained ala Ronnie and dorian, could his back have looked anything like theirs?

just like ronnie can train for 234 years, and never have calves like Paul or Dorian, could Dillett ever have a really great back?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10786 on:** October 28, 2006, 12:56:55 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on October 28, 2006, 12:24:14 PM

Ronnie never had the best genetics in BB though. If Dillet had the drive and work ethic of Coleman he would have been the best ever. He had a great midsection and calves just like dorian!

I never said Ronnie had the best genetics. I was just saying that a bodybuilder would need better genetics in order to surpass him. Dillet was good, but his back sucked ass. No amount of work ethic would make up for his crappy lats. I personally think Nasser had better potential. The guy was huge everwhere and had a flat midsection. His only problem was his back wasn't dry enough.

carvedoutofwood · « **Reply #10787 on:** October 28, 2006, 03:14:43 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 28, 2006, 12:56:55 PM

I never said Ronnie had the best genetics. I was just saying that a bodybuilder would need better genetics in order to surpass him. Dillet was good, but his back sucked ass. No amount of work ethic would make up for his crappy lats. I personally think Nasser had better potential. The guy was huge everwhere and had a flat midsection. His only problem was his back wasn't dry enough.

i think ronnie obviously had insane genetics...

... b

i agree with dillet... i think his structure limited his backs potential...

nicorulez · « **Reply #10788 on:** October 28, 2006, 03:43:06 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 28, 2006, 08:03:07 AM

There seems to be a trend towards Ronnie fans to be retarded but it needs further exaimination.

ND,

, I am a fan of both of these guys. I agree a lot with what you say bro.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10789 on:** October 28, 2006, 05:43:55 PM »

Quote from: carvedoutofwood on October 28, 2006, 03:14:43 PM

i think ronnie obviously had insane genetics... ... b i agree with dillet... i think his structure limited his backs potential...

exactly my point. Ronnie probably has better genetics than 99.9999% of the population. For somebody to surpass him, they would need to have better genetics. They would also have to become a bodybuilder and stay injury-free during their career. It's theoretically possible but the odds are extremely low.

pumpster · « **Reply #10790 on:** October 28, 2006, 05:46:26 PM »

Quote

Ronnie never had the best genetics in BB though.

That claim immediately confirms that you don't get it in general. All freaks have ridiculous great genetics. Genetics realized through training, nutrition and drugs.

Quote

i agree with dillet... i think his structure limited his backs potential...

No way of knowing what the limitations were without much more info. Same thing with Coleman's calves and various areas with Yates.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10791 on:** October 28, 2006, 05:47:42 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 28, 2006, 05:43:55 PM

exactly my point. Ronnie probably has better genetics than 99.9999% of the population. For somebody to surpass Ronnie, they would need to have better genetics. They would also have to become a bodybuilder and stay injury-free during their career. It's theoretically possible but the odds are extremely low.

Surpass Ronnie in what respect? Mr Olympia wins? I doubt that will ever happen again , and Ronnie doesn't have a great genetic structure but he has great genetics none the less.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10792 on:** October 28, 2006, 05:50:44 PM »

Pobrecito said someone will eventually come along who surpasses Coleman. I'm assuming he means Ronnie's combination of size, conditioning, and symmetry.

pumpster · « **Reply #10793 on:** October 28, 2006, 05:53:48 PM »

Quote

Pobrecito said someone will eventually come along who surpasses Coleman. I'm assuming he means Ronnie's combination of size, conditioning, and symmetry.

It will be interesting to see how long it takes to see one or more greats to surface; only happens every decade or more. It will be hard for anyone to surpass Coleman's size; it will instead likely be a combination.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10794 on:** October 28, 2006, 05:56:38 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 28, 2006, 05:50:44 PM

Pobrecito said someone will eventually come along who surpasses Coleman. I'm assuming he means Ronnie's combination of size, conditioning, and symmetry.

I think someone will be able to match Ronnie in terms of size & conditioning its possible ! it may not happen for a long time but the trend is going up.

Hulkster · « **Reply #10795 on:** October 28, 2006, 06:08:23 PM »

one thing is for sure, the Mr. Olympia of 1992 and 1993 was certainly surpassed when ronnie hit his peak.

at least that much I am sure you guys can all agree on.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10796 on:** October 28, 2006, 06:10:13 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 28, 2006, 06:08:23 PM

one thing is for sure, the Mr. Olympia of 1992 and 1993 was certainly surpassed when ronnie hit his peak.

at least that much I am sure you guys can all agree on.

Surpassed? lol not quite I honestly don't think anyone has match Dorian Yates in terms of muscular size , density , proportion and extreme conditioning , even to this day.

delta9mda · « **Reply #10797 on:** October 28, 2006, 06:12:07 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 28, 2006, 05:47:42 PM

Surpass Ronnie in what respect? Mr Olympia wins? I doubt that will ever happen again , and Ronnie doesn't have a great genetic structure but he has great genetics none the less.

you are forgetting haneys wins, he had 8 first. he is still the man by way of doing it first. argue/ discuss

delta9mda · « **Reply #10798 on:** October 28, 2006, 06:13:06 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 28, 2006, 05:56:38 PM

I think someone will be able to match Ronnie in terms of size & conditioning its possible ! it may not happen for a long time but the trend is going up.

freeman is almost there.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10799 on:** October 28, 2006, 06:23:33 PM »

Quote from: delta9mda on October 28, 2006, 06:12:07 PM

you are forgetting haneys wins, he had 8 first. he is still the man by way of doing it first. argue/ discuss

Well Arnold set the precedent for Haney to follow and he surpassed it , and Haney chased it beat it Ronnie has tied it and blew it on his attempt at setting himself above Haney .