Balance and proportion. Yates has overwhelming calves compared to his thighs. His arms are small (relatively to Coleman), and after the tear they were non-existent except from the side tricep. Ronnie has always been known for having better symmetry with smaller obliques.
exactly.
ND keeps going on about dorian's supposedly superior balance and proportion.
and yet he never seems to aknowlege the fact that peak Ronnie had far better balance and proportion than 93 Yates, who had a blocky physique, undersized arms for his frame, and calves that were so big they overpowered both his arms and his quads.
but he never ever listens to this



yates has never ever had better balance and proprotion than this.

even in 93, and ESPECIALLY post tear, dorian's arms were way too small for his frame. noticably so.
Lets look at this comparison: Ronnie 99 vs. Dorian post tear:

yes, Ronnie's calves are too small for his quads. but other than that, everything balances nicely.

then you have dorian. giant, wide back, but really wide waist too. non existant arms. huge calves for his quads.
you tell me who is better balanced and proportioned.