Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3492028 times)

In that case, how come Nasser kills Yates in this back shot-just the "lighting"? Delts much bigger, arms much bigger, better definition, comparable or better lat width...

As far as side shots, Yates appears ready to give birth..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11931 on:** November 05, 2006, 02:55:55 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 05, 2006, 02:48:00 PM

In that case, how come Nasser kills Yates in this back shot-just the "lighting"? Delts much bigger, arms much bigger, better definition, comparable or better lat width...

As far as side shots, Yates appears ready to give birth..

Lets see I scanned your post quick saw that it said Nasser is killing Yates from the back , reread that again just to make sure I didn't read it wrong and then realized you're retarded and let it pass .

Hulkster · « **Reply #11932 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:06:19 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 05, 2006, 02:12:33 PM

1996 check out those hams !

doesn't matter, in the context of this debate (that is now basically over thanks to all these pics) they are not as good as THESE:

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11933 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:10:52 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:06:19 PM

doesn't matter, in the context of this debate (that is now basically over thanks to all these pics) they are not as good as THESE:

Hulkster Ronnie has more detail in his hams okay but his whole lowerlegs throw off the entire effect because he has NO calves , and Ronnie at 247lbs at the 2001 ASC still lags behind in density , bulk , balance , I think he's just as dry as Yates but not as thick....impressive yes.

and do you feel like a loser for claiming I posted pics on Bodybuilding Dungeon and not on here because I was scared and none of the pics you posted from there were from me? lol

pumpster · « **Reply #11934 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:11:05 PM »

Quote

Lets see I scanned your post quick saw that it said Nasser is killing Yates from the back , reread that again just to make sure I didn't read it wrong and then realized you're retarded and let it pass .

Trust me you're speaking to an almost empty room-Nasser's out in front from the back where you claimed some kind of Yates dominance that doesn't exist.

Let's see, that leaves Yates with an edge in calves and side shots.

The names are clearly labeled, for the cognitively-challenged..

Hulkster · « **Reply #11935 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:14:43 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on November 05, 2006, 01:46:32 PM

damn, Shawn was better in 92 than 94

shawn, just like 1994, was a victim of politcs in 1992.

The only names anyone cared about leading into the olympia were;

dorian yates (placed second last year)
Kevin levrone (won his first bunch of pro shows, including a dominant NOC victory)
vince taylor (won everything he entered that year, including the Arnold Classic).

Shawn was clearly overlooked in 92, he looked FANTASTIC:

Hulkster · « **Reply #11936 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:16:31 PM »

Quote

and do you feel like a loser for claiming I posted pics on Bodybuilding Dungeon and not on here because I was scared and none of the pics you posted from there were from me? lol

my mistake - I should have known you never would have scanned a pic showing dorian getting owned.

that site was full of them

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11937 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:17:04 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 05, 2006, 03:11:05 PM

Trust me you're speaking to an almost empty room-Nasser's out in front from the back where you claimed some kind of Yates dominance that doesn't exist.

Let's see, that leaves Yates with an edge in calves and side shots.

The names are clearly labeled, for the cognitively-challenged..

You now live beyond the grace of God with that statement and its not even worth dignifying a response .

pumpster · « **Reply #11938 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:17:42 PM »

ND walking straight through proof once again.

Hulkster · « **Reply #11939 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:18:54 PM »

Quote

but his whole lowerlegs throw off the entire effect because he has NO calves ,

hmmmm..

sort of like having no biceps throws off the effect of the arms...

pobrecito · « **Reply #11940 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:19:15 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:14:43 PM

shawn, just like 1994, was a victim of politcs in 1992.

The only names anyone cared about leading into the olympia were;

dorian yates (placed second last year)
Kevin levrone (won his first bunch of pro shows, including a dominant NOC victory)
vince taylor (won everything he entered that year, including the Arnold Classic).

Shawn was clearly overlooked in 92, he looked FANTASTIC:

Shawn looks well conditioned....but just too tiny...I mean look at his lats...not very impressive at all. I would have been much more content with Kevin winning the O. Of course in 92, he was too bottom heavy.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11941 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:19:24 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:14:43 PM

shawn, just like 1994, was a victim of politcs in 1992.

The only names anyone cared about leading into the olympia were;

dorian yates (placed second last year)
Kevin levrone (won his first bunch of pro shows, including a dominant NOC victory)
vince taylor (won everything he entered that year, including the Arnold Classic).

Shawn was clearly overlooked in 92, he looked FANTASTIC:

It was a great field in 1992 high quality !! and Shawn was lighter in 92 vs 94 but he had the same conditioning in 94 making that his prime showing

Levrone a victim of to many contests and came in depleted and light

Vince Taylor lol please he wasn't in the running

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11942 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:20:48 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:16:31 PM

my mistake - I should have known you never would have scanned a pic showing dorian getting owned.

that site was full of them

I post the good and the bad a lot of great scans you used on this thread of Ronnie are from me !! and you really onwed yourself with that statement lol

pumpster · « **Reply #11943 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:22:38 PM »

Quote

It was a great field in 1992 high quality !! and Shawn was lighter in 92 vs 94 but he had the same conditioning in 94 making that his prime showing

Levrone a victim of to many contests and came in depleted and light

Vince Taylor lol please he wasn't in the running

Remarkable the lengths this ND goes not to pretend politics are non-existent-it would offend Flex/Iron Age.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11944 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:22:52 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 05, 2006, 03:18:54 PM

hmmmm..

sort of like having no biceps throws off the effect of the arms...

Oh please Dorian's has biceps Ronnie has NO calves at all !! he has no development , detail , seperation , size , shape nothing all of his back shots suffer for this reason .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11945 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:24:07 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 05, 2006, 03:22:38 PM

Remarkable the lengths this ND goes not to pretend politics are non-existent-it would offend Flex/Iron Age.

Oh yes there was Yates 1992 who never deserved to win ANY contest ever and he was handpicked because he was white and had outstanding marketablity lol

pumpster · « **Reply #11946 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:25:08 PM »

Quote

Oh please Dorian's has biceps Ronnie has NO calves at all !! he has no development , detail , seperation , size , shape nothing all of his back shots suffer for this reason .

Is that why Nassers arms, both bis AND tris appear to be at least 3" bigger than Yates' flapjacks, and are more cut?

Yates doesn't seem to have delts in this comparison to Nasser's cannonballs, either.

pobrecito · « **Reply #11947 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:27:11 PM »

Nasser is very waterlogged there

pumpster · « **Reply #11948 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:29:54 PM »

In the middle of his back maybe; everywhere else the advantages are obvious. Arms and delts are far bigger with better cuts.

Hulkster · « **Reply #11949 on:** November 05, 2006, 03:30:51 PM »

I still think Shawn had by far and above the greatest midsection ever.

best overall abs, intercostals, serratus and tiny waist to boot.