Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3506234 times)

pobrecito · « **Reply #12775 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:35:53 PM »

Man, it's like comparing a piece of peanut butter brittle and a pancake. One is rock hard and dry the other is soft and full. Yates clearly dominating Coleman from the backside. Complete from top to bottom whereas Ronnie is incomplete. These 93 screencaps have only validated what camp Yates has been saying for 500 or so pages now. Yates wins

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12776 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:37:25 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 09, 2006, 05:34:33 PM

even more 99 being more dry than 98.

ND, how do you shovel the amount of bullshit you speak?

Hulkster you're using a crappy scan to compare drryness to a video still , what the fuck dude? how about an eyewitness account? how about someone who was there? how about he was bone dry in 1998 and not so in 99?

pobrecito · « **Reply #12777 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:40:42 PM »

Hulkster has proven he is either not so smart or he is smoking a lot of pot up there in canada

First he claims Dorian the most overrated of all time ....and now overrated calves....hahahahaha.... what a joke. Camp Yates has proven that Yates dominates Coleman. The 93 screencaps have only validified that! Combine the pictures with the masterful verbose by sucky and ND and you have utter domination !!!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12778 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:40:52 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on November 09, 2006, 05:35:53 PM

Man, it's like comparing a piece of peanut butter brittle and a pancake. One is rock hard and dry the other is soft and full. Yates clearly dominating Coleman from the backside. Complete from top to bottom whereas Ronnie is incomplete. These 93 screencaps have only validated what camp Yates has been saying for 500 or so pages now. Yates wins

Exactly !! look at the huge difference in dryness , this would be a major hurdle for Ronnie 03 , hell any version of Ronnie.

Hulkster · « **Reply #12779 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:47:32 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 09, 2006, 05:33:53 PM

DRY OVERALL not just from the front and you don't know more than Peter McGough even though you think so.

Does that mean that Peter as blind as you are?:

Hulkster · « **Reply #12780 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:50:46 PM »

Quote

Hulkster you're using a crappy scan to compare drryness to a video still , what the f**k dude? how about an eyewitness account? how about someone who was there? how about he was bone dry in 1998 and not so in 99?

show me one shot of him in 98 that looks this dry and I will believe you.

eyewitness accounts don't mean anything unless there is some EVIDENCE to COROBERATE their story:

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12781 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:51:37 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 09, 2006, 05:47:32 PM

Does that mean that Peter as blind as you are?:

See this is the part I give up on any hope you can be honest or objective in this debate , you're using a scan vs a screencap big difference in quality and you're dismissing the opinion of someone who was there for all the contests in question , you're actually saying he's wrong and you're right and you're using a scan vs screencap as ' proof ' hey keep on denying the facts you've become good at that lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12782 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:54:11 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 09, 2006, 05:50:46 PM

show me one shot of him in 98 that looks this dry and I will believe you.

eyewitness accounts don't mean anything unless there is some EVIDENCE to COROBERATE their story:

Here you go

pobrecito · « **Reply #12783 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:55:43 PM »

Hulkster, have you been smoking that penicillin weed again? $:-\$

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12784 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:59:12 PM »

See this is what clearly seperated Dorian from Ronnie in the back department and its lower lats and erctor spinae , this is one area where Dorian's thickness pays off , Ronnie has a very comprable back to lats but Dorian has the lowerlats and the better lowerback , Ronnie looks fantastic about midback up and midback down this is where Yates has the better back overall !

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #12785 on:** November 09, 2006, 05:59:37 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 09, 2006, 05:40:52 PM

Exactly !! look at the huge difference in dryness , this would be a major hurdle for Ronnie 03 , hell any version of Ronnie.

what you percieve as "dryness," I see as less posing oil and bad skin (in the rear lat spread).

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12786 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:01:07 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on November 09, 2006, 05:59:37 PM

what you percieve as "dryness," I see as less posing oil and bad skin (in the rear lat spread).

And thats why you're NOT as knowlegable as me !! keep reading maybe one day you'll be

Hulkster · « **Reply #12787 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:01:24 PM »

why should I believe someone's 'eyewitness opinion" when there is not one single shread of evidence to support it and tons of evidence to prove the contrary?

answer please:

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12788 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:02:13 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on November 09, 2006, 05:55:43 PM

Hulkster, have you been smoking that penicillin weed again? $:-\$

he must be because he actually claimed Ronnie 99 has more detail in his calves than Yates 1993 lol no seriously he did !!

pobrecito · « **Reply #12789 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:02:54 PM »

Desert-like dryness vs. water buffalo.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #12790 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:03:18 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 09, 2006, 06:01:07 PM

And thats why you're NOT as knowlegable as me !! keep reading maybe one day you'll be

likewise, I can say the same about you. You still cannot even explain what clues you look for to determine who has better conditioning. You keep praising Dorian's "dryness" yet I can find plenty of pictures where they look the same.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12791 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:03:48 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 09, 2006, 06:01:24 PM

why should I believe someone's 'eyewitness opinion" when there is not one single shread of evidence to support it and tons of evidence to prove the contrary?

answer please:

Answered

Hulkster · « **Reply #12792 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:04:07 PM »

notice: quads, arms, chest all way more dry in 99.

what was that about having better overall dryness in 1998?

you are an idiot. I have just posted tons of pics showing that Ronnie was more seperated and dry in 1999 than in 1998 and you insist that they are all bullshit because Peter McGough 'said so'

Use your own brain and eyes for once.

Hulkster · « **Reply #12793 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:05:26 PM »

Look closely. Is there really any difference?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12794 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:05:46 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on November 09, 2006, 06:03:18 PM

likewise, I can say the same about you. You still cannot even explain what clues you look for to determine who has better conditioning. You keep praising Dorian's "dryness" yet I can find plenty of pictures where they look the same.

You can but the difference between you and I is my statements carry some authority and weight to them and yours reak of bias and ignorance

Ronnie 1998 comes close in terms of overall dryness but 2003 lol I wont dignify with a response.

pobrecito · « **Reply #12795 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:06:13 PM »

Ronnie was definitely drier in 98. Just check the video on YouTube. Both 98 and 99 posing routines are on there

And it's not like it matters anyways...Yates has already been proven to be superior

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12796 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:06:24 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 09, 2006, 06:05:26 PM

Look closely. Is there really any difference?

yes

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12797 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:08:28 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on November 09, 2006, 06:06:13 PM

Ronnie was definitely drier in 98. Just check the video on YouTube. Both 98 and 99 posing routines are on there

And it's not like it matters anyways...Yates has already been proven to be superior

You just don't get a better frontlatspread than Yates , you really don't for years Haney dominated this pose until Yates overtook him in it

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12798 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:13:24 PM »

Look at the HUGE difference in dryness compared Ronnie with Dorian in midpose I mean get serious

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #12799 on:** November 09, 2006, 06:14:37 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 09, 2006, 06:05:46 PM

You can but the difference between you and I is my statements carry some authority and weight to them and yours reak of bias and ignorance.

Ronnie 1998 comes close in terms of overall dryness but 2003 lol I wont dignify with a response.

ha ha ha, that's why several people have called you a hypocrite and biased.

I never said Ronnie in 03 was at his dryest. Not once. I was just pointing out that Ronnie wasn't as waterlogged like you portray him as.