when you say things that defy logic , commonsense , honesty , objectivity and out right facts you isolate yourself as being nothing more than a delusional , biased , insane Yates hater
if thats true why are there 4 billion pics on this thread of Yates being owned or at least not exactly looking as dominating as his scoresheets would suggest?

my opinions and claims are strongly backed up with actual proof.
You argue using quotes and scores.
Problem is - they do not add
strength to your argument.
all they do is repeat what you are saying
without adding any sort of corroberating evidence. And no, ND, extreme solitary black and white closeups are not exactly great at showing Yates' supposed perfect dominance over his competitors. For that you need him with other pros onstage - and of course, that is where the problems arise...this thread has lots of proof for that.
Your main point of arguing is repetition.
but it is repetition without strong substantiation.
If yates was as good as you say and the judges were spot on, there should be a SHORTAGE of pics making Yates look less than dominating, rather than an ABUNDANCE as this thread has shown..