Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3495909 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14500 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:33:01 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 26, 2006, 05:30:35 AM

LET'S THANK ND FOR THIS PICTORIAL VERIFICATION.

Wow thats a news flash for you? Dorian had a gut in 97? lol you need to pay attention some more and look at Shawn's gut

and Sergio who has NO arms and a belly like a cow.

pumpster · « **Reply #14501 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:34:20 AM »

Quote

Quote from: suckmymuscle on July 31, 2006, 05:59:58 PM
Dude, I fucking hate your guts. I hope you get cancer and die with blood spilling through all your holes.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

What's funny is that SUCKY isn't kidding.

Quote

Quote from: NeoSeminole on Today at 07:09:54 AM
unfortunately, your posts are full of shit. Your insults are lame and your math is poor for an elementary student. When you feel overwhelmed by others who make you look dumb, you threaten them via personal messages, wish cancer upon them or call them a "turd." Now go back to playing in your sand box little kid.

Didn't you know that SUCKY is a "graduate student of physiology" who spells it "resistence"?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14502 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:34:37 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 26, 2006, 05:32:24 AM

Scwarzenegger made the statements in Flex in the mid-90s, to the effect that the look was akin to powerlifting, not BB.

You're full of shit , he did not I have the issue where Arnold criticizes Dorian for not doing more to promote bodybuilding , he said he wins the title and runs back to England every year , stop lying.

pumpster · « **Reply #14503 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:36:56 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 26, 2006, 05:34:37 AM

You're full of shit , he did not I have the issue where Arnold criticizes Dorian for not doing more to promote bodybuilding , he said he wins the title and runs back to England every year , stop lying.

Nope, i read it. After that i noticed that i NEVER saw a friendly picture of the two of them together, either.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14504 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:38:39 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 26, 2006, 05:36:56 AM

Nope, i read it. After that i noticed that i NEVER saw a friendly picture of the two of them together, either.

No arms and a belly like a cow

pumpster · « **Reply #14505 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:44:41 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 26, 2006, 05:38:39 AM

No arms and a belly like a cow

That Oliva quote really nailed it:

17" guns, 40" belly..

Yates pictured here trying to depict how big around he is.

Hulkster · « **Reply #14506 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:47:39 AM »

Quote

Take out the tape measurer and you'll see that Ronnie's arms were about 23" while Dorian's were 21".

sucky, as usual, you are overlooking an obvious point with your arguments:

the fact that a 2 inch difference is a substantial difference in arm size, esp. when viewed onstage standing side by side with someone.

eg. Lee haney's arms have taped 20..5 inches.

and look at the incredible obvious size difference between haney's arms and ronnie's.

You think dorian standing beside Ronnie would be any different?

hell no.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14507 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:47:48 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 26, 2006, 05:44:41 AM

That Oliva quote really nailed it:

17" guns, 40" belly..
Yates pictured here trying to depict how big around he is.

The pot calling the kettle black

pumpster · « **Reply #14508 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:49:17 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 26, 2006, 05:47:39 AM

sucky, as usual, you are overlooking an obvious point with your arguments:

the fact that a 2 inch difference is a substantial difference in arm size, esp. when viewed onstage standing side by side with someone.

eg. Lee haney's arms have taped 20..5 inches.

and look at the incredible obvious size difference between haney's arms and ronnie's.

You think dorian standing beside Ronnie would be any different?

hell no.

Was that cold or pumped?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14509 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:49:23 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 26, 2006, 05:47:39 AM

sucky, as usual, you are overlooking an obvious point with your arguments:

the fact that a 2 inch difference is a substantial difference in arm size, esp. when viewed onstage standing side by side with someone.

eg. Lee haney's arms have taped 20..5 inches.

and look at the incredible obvious size difference between haney's arms and ronnie's.

You think dorian standing beside Ronnie would be any different?

hell no.

Again the biggest arms don't mean anything Yates never had the biggest arms and constantly beat people who did , its a moot point , its an imaginary edge just like taper and striations , thats not why Dorian won its not why Ronnie won.

Hulkster · « **Reply #14510 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:50:27 AM »

great pics ND.

they help to show how easily Ronnie would beat Dorian.

lets begin:

Hulkster · « **Reply #14511 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:51:11 AM »

ouch. these pics show just how easily Ronnie 99 would crush even the 93 Yates.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14512 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:51:20 AM »

Flex Magazine Jan 1994

quote from Kevin Horton

At all times , he is precisely what he says he is. exaggeration and inaccuracy are not in his nature. Never can you put him on the spot. If he says his arms are 22 inches you can measure them and they'll be 22 inches.

Dorian had 22' arms probably not in contest shape , but his arms aren't small.

pumpster · « **Reply #14513 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:51:32 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 26, 2006, 05:47:48 AM

The pot calling the kettle black

Here's another one, since ND's in to showing guys in their 40s and 50s:

Hulkster · « **Reply #14514 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:53:09 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 26, 2006, 05:49:23 AM

Again the biggest arms don't mean anything Yates never had the biggest arms and constantly beat people who did , its a moot point , its an imaginary edge just like taper and striations , thats not why Dorian won its not why Ronnie won.

ah, but again, you miss the point,

Yates beat shawn and flex who had better striations/detail because he was 60 pounds heavier.

He beat Nasser because he had a good back.

Ronnie had both of these things, so yates' advantages would be GONE.

The whole reason yates beat all those guys would not even be applicable against a 99 ronnie.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14515 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:54:21 AM »

Just make sure you show Ronnie from the knees up

pumpster · « **Reply #14516 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:54:38 AM »

OLYMPIAN'S MONSTER GUNZ SERIES:

the shadow · « **Reply #14517 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:55:04 AM »

a tribute to the best thread ever...
it all started with ND being man enough to end their debates once and for all..
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=69359.0

davidpaul · « **Reply #14518 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:56:00 AM »

Quote from: the shadow on November 26, 2006, 05:55:04 AM

a tribute to the best thread ever...

sushant kupar

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14519 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:57:57 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 26, 2006, 05:53:09 AM

ah, but again, you miss the point,

Yates beat shawn and flex who had better striations/detail because he was 60 pounds heavier.

He beat Nasser because he had a good back.

Ronnie had both of these things, so yates' advantages would be GONE.

The whole reason yates beat all those guys would not even be applicable against a 99 ronnie.

Again you forget Dorian beat Ronnie in 1996/1997 who had all of his ' advantages ' with the exception of great overall conditioning , you keep trying to use Shawn & Flew as examples and it failed , you ever see Levrone's back? he;s no slouch , Ronnie 96/97 had the great arms , the better quads sweep , the much better taper , the great back etc and he still got his ass handed to him by a less than stella Dorian Yates nevermind a injury-free Yates.

Hulkster · « **Reply #14520 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:58:14 AM »

ouch once again.

Ronnie 99 winning would be a peice of cake, simply because all the reasons that Yates beat nasser, shawn, flex et. al, would NOT BE VALID anymore, and thus would be useless.

it would be an easy win for Ronnie.

the shadow · « **Reply #14521 on:** November 26, 2006, 05:59:18 AM »

and then hulkster came with a loaded rifle...
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=69359.25

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14522 on:** November 26, 2006, 06:00:13 AM »

Ronnie compares well from the knees up , incomplete !!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14523 on:** November 26, 2006, 06:01:17 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 26, 2006, 05:58:14 AM

ouch once again.

Ronnie 99 winning would be a peice of cake, simply because all the reasons that Yates beat nasser, shawn, flex et. al, would NOT BE VALID anymore, and thus would be useless.

it would be an easy win for Ronnie.

Great comparison and Yates is 242 pounds in that pic and still almost as wide with better conditioning , fool.

the shadow · « **Reply #14524 on:** November 26, 2006, 06:01:52 AM »

and just like page 2,the rest of the pages were more or less the same...