Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3491814 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14825 on: November 26, 2006, 02:08:54 PM »
Ronnie 99 has more detail lmfao

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14826 on: November 26, 2006, 02:28:23 PM »
No, they don't. They clearly show that Dorian's gut was infinitely smaller than Ronnie's in 2003

ha ha ha, nope.





Quote
Ok, 52.5 centimeters. How much is that, retard?

why are you calling me retarded after you just made yourself look like a dumbass for forgetting what you said earlier? "Who said that? I want to see your sources." ::)

By the way, you added half a centimeter b/c I distinctly remember calculating his arm to be less than 20.5" Nice try desparate child.

Quote
It doesen't matter, retard, because that's where a bodybuilder's lat width is measured. Does the lat spread wider in the upper part or the lower part? Duh! It doesen't matter if it grows 1 inch, 1 milimeter or one meter, the bottom line is that where the most muscle tissue is added too is irrelevant. The rear lat spread evaluates lat width, and Dorian had more of it than Ronnie did in 1999. You make it seem like 3-4 inches is little, when in reality it is a huge increase in lat width. You can add 20 lbs of muscle tissue to you lats and you'd still not gain 4 inches to each side. Nice try, idiot.

Once again, I never said lat width is not measured using the upper part of the lats. My point is that you cannot add more than 3-4 inches each side, which means the difference between Dorian and Ronnie when they weighed the same was negligable. You even said yourself that a person can add 20 lbs of muscle to each lat and only gain 4 inches per side. This is why Ronnie in 03 was only slightly wider than Dorian who weighed 30 lbs less. It looks like you are finally starting to come to your senses. Good job. :)

Quote
It doesen't matter, because this analogy does not apply to the lats. Why? Due to the positioning of the tendons. In the case of the biceps, the two tendons are in the same plane, so the middle part that grows the most in terms of muscle tissue is also the one that sticks out the most. The lats, conversely, always protrude more near the upper tendon because it is situated further out than the lower one. Do you understand this? Should I repeat myself again? Where the most muscle tissue is added has no relevance in the case of measuring lat width.

My analogy applies to any muscle in the body. Every muscle, regardless of shape or orientation, experiences the least absolute growth closest to its insertion. This is a simple anatomical concept. I challenge you to find me one example that contradicts my claim.

Quote
My posts are fucking brilliant. And I don't make dumb assertions, like that somehow where the most muscle tissue is added to the lats is somehow relevant to evaluating the width of the lats. Or that 3-4 inches of lat width increase is not much, when in reality is a monstrous increase in size. You tried, and failed miserably. Your arguments are shit.

suuuuure. I guess that's why you have been obliterated plenty of times by Praetor Fenix, usmokepole, and me. ;)

Quote
Such as your math, which tells you that an increase of 4 inches in lat width to the sides is little...?

an increase of 4" is small compared to other muscles, such as the biceps and quads. I fail to see how my math skills are poor. Unlike you, I know how to add/subtract and round up/down.

Quote
Yeah, that's probably the reason why you call everyone a "dipshit". And why you called me "suckmydick" and "little kid". And of all the people who've posted at this thread, you're the one who's the easiest to own. I have received over a dozen PMs congratulating me for the brutal way I've owned you and that you are unable to reply to even a single one of my posts. There are intelligent posters in the Coleman side, like PraetorFenix, but you're not one of them.

I can care less if you've recieved compliments from others for the way you "owned" me. Honestly, I think you recieved maybe 1 or 2 messages from other Dorian nuthuggers and you're exaggerating the number. Either way, it doesn't matter. People with low IQs tend to flock together like flies on shit while those with higher IQs usually work independently. I have watched others destroy you over and over, yet I never sent them a personal message congratulating them. They already know they owned you without any praise from me. As long as you keep posting here, I will continue to watch you wallow in your own stupidity.

LyricTenor

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 470
  • Athiest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14827 on: November 26, 2006, 02:29:50 PM »
Yates absolutely smokes Ronnie on the rear lat.



Holy shit.
We work with being, but non-being is what we use.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14828 on: November 26, 2006, 02:55:13 PM »

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14829 on: November 26, 2006, 02:59:11 PM »

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14830 on: November 26, 2006, 03:01:21 PM »
yep ;)

Coleman has the same classic wide but smooth lat spread as Lee Haney.

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14831 on: November 26, 2006, 03:08:44 PM »
Coleman with a little bit of hair. Hulkster knows it makes sense. LOL


pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14832 on: November 26, 2006, 03:23:40 PM »
hahaha...Dorian owns Haney AND Coleman 8)

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14833 on: November 26, 2006, 03:31:46 PM »
hahaha...Dorian owns Haney AND Coleman 8)

hahaha delusional.
just push some weight!

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14834 on: November 26, 2006, 03:51:57 PM »
Dorian still has the greatest lat spread of all time. I don't see it ever being beaten.




NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14835 on: November 26, 2006, 05:07:07 PM »
Dorian still has the greatest lat spread of all time. I don't see it ever being beaten.

too bad you are wrong. Dorian had a great lat spread... for a guy who weighed 260 lbs. Ronnie surpassed Dorian in 03 when he weighed 287 lbs and had great conditioning. He made Dorian look small in comparison. Even Peter McGough said Ronnie has the best back of all time.




suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14836 on: November 26, 2006, 06:09:32 PM »
too bad you are wrong. Dorian had a great lat spread... for a guy who weighed 260 lbs. Ronnie surpassed Dorian in 03 when he weighed 287 lbs and had great conditioning. He made Dorian look small in comparison. Even Peter McGough said Ronnie has the best back of all time.





  Oh, but you just said the difference in lat width between them is neglegible, because the lats can only grow 3 or 4 inches. Dumbass. 8)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14837 on: November 26, 2006, 06:36:37 PM »
 ;)
Flower Boy Ran Away

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14838 on: November 26, 2006, 06:45:24 PM »
ha ha ha, nope.




  I don't understand why you keep posting these pics, since Dorian's gut is infinitely better than Ronnie's in 2003. ::)

Quote
 why are you calling me retarded after you just made yourself look like a dumbass for forgetting what you said earlier? "Who said that? I want to see your sources." ::)

  Whatever. 52 centimeters is pretty fucking close to 21". Regardless, it doesen't matter, because Ronnie's arm advantage was 2" or so and only apparent when he's flexing his arms from the front.

Quote
By the way, you added half a centimeter b/c I distinctly remember calculating his arm to be less than 20.5" Nice try desparate child.

  Half a centimeter is negligible. You're picking at straws for lack of content.

Quote
Once again, I never said lat width is not measured using the upper part of the lats. My point is that you cannot add more than 3-4 inches each side, which means the difference between Dorian and Ronnie when they weighed the same was negligable. You even said yourself that a person can add 20 lbs of muscle to each lat and only gain 4 inches per side. This is why Ronnie in 03 was only slightly wider than Dorian who weighed 30 lbs less. It looks like you are finally starting to come to your senses. Good job. :)

  My point is that it doesen't matter where the most mass is added to the lats, because the upper part remains wider, irrespective of how much more mass is added to the lower part of it. First of all, I don't even know if you can add only 3 or 4 inches to each side of the lats. Secondly, you make it sound like it's little, when it obviously makes a huge difference in lat width. Thirdly, this would only be relevant to the discussion if lat width were measured in the lower part; since it's not, then your argument is irrelevant. It doesen't matter if it's 1 inch, two inches or a foot, the bottom line is that the upper part is where width is measured, and every milimeter counts. If "all" you could add to the width of the lats were 3 or 4 inches, then there wouldn't be any case in having an entire mandatory to showcase this. I would like to claim to owning to myself, but this is the case where my opponent is so fucking stupid that he owned himself. :-X ;)

Quote
My analogy applies to any muscle in the body. Every muscle, regardless of shape or orientation, experiences the least absolute growth closest to its insertion. This is a simple anatomical concept. I challenge you to find me one example that contradicts my claim.

  This is true, but it's not relevant to this discussion, because due to the attachment position of the lats, the upper part remains wider visually. And that's where the relevance of lat width is concerned.  So who cares if it grows more in terms of muscle tissue in the middle? ::)

Quote
suuuuure. I guess that's why you have been obliterated plenty of times by Praetor Fenix, usmokepole, and me. ;)

  Keep telling that to yourself, and you might end up believing it... ;)

Quote
an increase of 4" is small compared to other muscles, such as the biceps and quads. I fail to see how my math skills are poor. Unlike you, I know how to add/subtract and round up/down.

  It doesen't matter, because that's where the lats remain wider. It could be only one inch, and it would still look like wider there then in the middle. The isssue here is that the muscle grows symmetrically as far as shape, ant the asymmetric increase in muscle mass does not change that. Geez! ::)

Quote
I can care less if you've recieved compliments from others for the way you "owned" me. Honestly, I think you recieved maybe 1 or 2 messages from other Dorian nuthuggers and you're exaggerating the number. Either way, it doesn't matter. People with low IQs tend to flock together like flies on shit

  That's probably the reason why you've mentioned yourself along with PraetorFenix and Usmokepole. ;D Although, personally, I think that's unfair to PraetorFenix. ;)

Quote
while those with higher IQs usually work independently.

  Yeah, that's probably the reason why so many Nobel Prizes are shared... ::)

Quote
I have watched others destroy you over and over, yet I never sent them a personal message congratulating them. They already know they owned you without any praise from me. As long as you keep posting here, I will continue to watch you wallow in your own stupidity.

  No one has come even close to destroying me, and I won't go anywhere. This thread can go on for another three thousand pages and I'll be right here debating your moronic diatribes. Just because you think that you owned me with your stupid lat claims, don't think for a second that you're more intelligent than me. I always sustained that the lats grow the same in the upper and lower parts visually; I never claimed that as much mass is added to the upper part as to the lower.

  You're seriously out of your league to think that you're more intelligent than me. Personally, I couldn't care less anyway, since I don't base my self-esteem on what an incognita thinks of me on a message board. I will let you believe whatever you want, as tons of people have openly complimented my intellect not only at the Gossip&Opinion board but also at several others. Hell, PraetorFenix himself said that I'm very smart. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14839 on: November 26, 2006, 07:18:43 PM »
dorian and ronnie, back relaxed:

Flower Boy Ran Away

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14840 on: November 26, 2006, 07:21:08 PM »
Oh, but you just said the difference in lat width between them is neglegible, because the lats can only grow 3 or 4 inches.

in addition to failing elementary math, you appear to have the reading comprehension of a 2nd grader. I said the difference in lat width between Dorian and Ronnie when they weighed the same was negligable. The pic of Ronnie in the comparison is from 03 when he outweighed Dorian by 30 lbs. Dumbass.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14841 on: November 26, 2006, 07:28:48 PM »
in addition to failing elementary math, you appear to have the reading comprehension of a 2nd grader. I said the difference in lat width between Dorian and Ronnie when they weighed the same was negligable. The pic of Ronnie in the comparison is from 03 when he outweighed Dorian by 30 lbs. Dumbass.

  Regardless of how small the difference is, it's still there. That's why the shot is called "rear lat spread". I do think that Dorian's lats spread wider than Ronnie in his 1999 form, for a very simple reason: Dorian's lat mass was greater, and thus the lats were wider. It is impossible for the mass in the middle and lower parts of the lats to increase without the upper lats being wider, too. Show me a single example of o bodybuilder having more lat mass than another but narrower lats and I'll eat up all my words. Hint: it can't be done. I own you, dude. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14842 on: November 26, 2006, 07:31:46 PM »
in addition to failing elementary math, you appear to have the reading comprehension of a 2nd grader. I said the difference in lat width between Dorian and Ronnie when they weighed the same was negligable. The pic of Ronnie in the comparison is from 03 when he outweighed Dorian by 30 lbs. Dumbass.

  Besides, my point wass that Dorian "only" had 3 or 4 inches more of lat width than an average man and yet it made all the difference. A back is radically transformed by adding 3 or 4 inches. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
 

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14843 on: November 26, 2006, 07:32:35 PM »
best lat spread ever. (by Dorian) ;D

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14844 on: November 26, 2006, 07:32:44 PM »
Ronnie demonstrating his far superior shoulder to waist differential:

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14845 on: November 26, 2006, 07:33:45 PM »
take note of how dorian's thick waist ruins everything.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14846 on: November 26, 2006, 07:35:21 PM »
check out Ronnie's incredible arms and then compare them to dorian's :):

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14847 on: November 26, 2006, 07:41:09 PM »
Dorian 93 vs Ronnie 2003:

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14848 on: November 26, 2006, 07:48:59 PM »
For all the shit Hulkster talks about Dorian's quads, anybody find it ironic that Dorian's quads here are more separated than Ronnie's ;). Let's not even get into Ronnie's oil inflated, twig calves.



NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #14849 on: November 26, 2006, 07:54:37 PM »
I don't understand why you keep posting these pics, since Dorian's gut is infinitely better than Ronnie's in 2003.

they look the same to me. At the very least, Dorian's gut here does not look "infinitely better" than 03 Ronnie's.





Quote
Whatever. 52 centimeters is pretty fucking close to 21". Regardless, it doesen't matter, because Ronnie's arm advantage was 2" or so and only apparent when he's flexing his arms from the front.

52 cm is equal to 20.47," which is more than half an inch less than 21." You keep rounding up even though you are not supposed to. Ronnie's arms were 23" in 97 when he weighed 260 lbs. This is already greater than a 2" difference. His arms were even bigger in 03 when he weighed 287 lbs. Logic tells us that his arms in 03 must have been more than 2" larger than Dorian's.

Quote
Half a centimeter is negligible. You're picking at straws for lack of content.

you made up a measurement and now you're trying to justify your actions by saying I'm picking at straws. ::)

face it, you are wrong. You claimed 03 Ronnie's arms were only 2" bigger than Dorian's.

Quote
My point is that it doesen't matter where the most mass is added to the lats, because the upper part remains wider, irrespective of how much more mass is added to the lower part of it. First of all, I don't even know if you can add only 3 or 4 inches to each side of the lats. Secondly, you make it sound like it's little, when it obviously makes a huge difference in lat width. Thirdly, this would only be relevant to the discussion if lat width were measured in the lower part; since it's not, then your argument is irrelevant. It doesen't matter if it's 1 inch, two inches or a foot, the bottom line is that the upper part is where width is measured, and every milimeter counts. If "all" you could add to the width of the lats were 3 or 4 inches, then there wouldn't be any case in having an entire mandatory to showcase this. I would like to claim to owning to myself, but this is the case where my opponent is so fucking stupid that he owned himself.

blah blah blah. You have an inferiority complex that makes you have to get the last word in b/c, in your mind, you think it makes you right. You just agreed with me in your last post. So I don't know why you are still arguing with me.

Quote
It doesen't matter, because that's where the lats remain wider. It could be only one inch, and it would still look like wider there then in the middle. The isssue here is that the muscle grows symmetrically as far as shape, ant the asymmetric increase in muscle mass does not change that. Geez!

actually, it does matter b/c earlier you kept claiming that Dorian is wider. I have shown why this is not true.

Quote
Yeah, that's probably the reason why so many Nobel Prizes are shared...

hey dipshit, I was referring to people who post on a message board. All the Dorian nuthuggers are quick to pat each other on the back and jack each other off as soon as someone makes a post in favor of Dorian. You can usually tell who's not that intelligent and who is by their responses. "Oooh, good job Sucky. You just owned everybody." ::)

Quote
You're seriously out of your league to think that you're more intelligent than me. Personally, I couldn't care less anyway, since I don't base my self-esteem on what an incognita thinks of me on a message board. I will let you believe whatever you want, as tons of people have openly complimented my intellect not only at the Gossip&Opinion board but also at several others. Hell, PraetorFenix himself said that I'm very smart.

sorry to burst your bubble, but they were blowing smoke up your ass. ;)