Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

damn it is embarassing when you compare dorian's mm to Ronnie's!

[NarcissisticDeity]

Samir Bannout who had one of the best backs mind you on Cutler 2001

Jay Cutler blows the other bodybuilders away with the crisp detail of his muscularity from top to bottom. He has superior calves, hamstrings and glutes. His back is detailed and big, but it does not match up well against Ronnie, who has the second-best back in the history of bodybuilding behind the great Dorian Yates

Ronnie has the second best back behind the great Dorian Yates


Ronnie Coleman on Dorian Yates

DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.

[suckmymuscle]

ha ha ha, retard. You're quick to pat Sucky on the ass without reading my responses. He could make shit up, and you would still say "owned." The reason I didn't bother to respond to his post is b/c he agreed with me earlier.

  I never agreed with you, dumbass. Let's recapitulate: you claimed that I said something that I never did. I never said that the lats grow more in the upper part in terms of muscle mass, but rather visually. You would have owned me if I had said that the as much muscle tissue is added to the upper lats as to the middle and lower one. You made a charge that I'm willing to prove wrong. As Cicero would say it, the burden of proof lies with those who make the accusation. Again, let's get Ron to search the board's database - because I can't edit my posts there -, and, if he finds a post where I especifically wrote that the upper lats grow as much in terms of muscle mass as the lower part, then I will apologize to you and agree that I was mistaken. The thing is, yous see, that deep down you know I never said that, and you keep insisting on it because that would be the only claim you'd have for having owned me.

In fact, his whole post is nothing more than a strawman attempt to make himself look like the victor. Sucky is delusional in that he thinks by getting the last word in, somehow this makes him correct. I could say "2 + 2 = 4" and he would still type a marathon post saying "no, 2 + 2 = 4."

  Ugh...So  now is 23" - 21" not equal to 2". You picked at straws by making a big deal out of half an inch, and it is clear that I said that the article where Dorian's arms measurement appeared said either 52 centimeters or 53. The fact is that I don't recall if it was one or the other. The bottom line is that either 52 or 53 cm are pretty fucking close to 21". And furthermore, I'm still waiting for your proof that Dorian's arms were 20.5". You lost the argument completely, but I will allow you to feel better about yourself by just typing that I'm delusional and that I said something I never did in the first place.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

  And by the way, NeoSperminole, continue to insist that I was wrong and you were right about the lat thing, and I will continue to re-post that I never said what you claimed I did. I never said that the upper part of the lats grows as much in terms of muscle tissue added in the upper part as in the lower; when I wrote that, I was talking about visual growth, so nothing that I wrote was wrong. You just claimed I did. Make the claim again, and I will re-post this reply again; make the claim another 300 times, and I will re-post it 300 times to ad infinitum.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[Hulkster]

you can try and debate Ronnie and dorian's arm measurements all you want but this fact is undisputable:

If nasser's arms made dorians look small onstage, Ronnie's would do the same:

[NarcissisticDeity]

you can try and debate Ronnie and dorian's arm measurements all you want but this fact is undisputable:

If nasser's arms made dorians look small onstage, Ronnie's would do the same:

Not Dorian's best is it?

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie 1998 nice gut and bitch-tits 

[Hulkster]

Not Dorian's best is it?

what is your point?

Ronnie's 99 arms would still be noticably larger than dorian's 93 arms onstage

no question:

[Hulkster]

closeup time: ronnie winning the 99 O. and Dorian winning the 92 O:

[pumpster]

Since ND keeps bringing up McGough's credibility and obvious reverence for him:


DEC 06 FLEX, PETER MCGOUGH p. 114:



"Ronnie Coleman, with the best back in BB history.."




Thanks Pete, your words have just helped destroy one of the only remaining areas under serious contention....

[Hulkster]

anyone notice how massive ronnie's traps were at 257 ripped?


I guess ND has his foot firmly in his mouth about the "small traps from the front" bullshit.

[Hulkster]

are dorian's traps always this unsymmetrical?

apparently.

yes, what great balance

[Hulkster]

now THESE are traps.

"HUGE from the front"

LOL:

[pumpster]

ND doesn't seem to care that Yates looks like a martian in these shots..this expression's a real crowd-pleaser.

[pumpster]

The case of the incredible disappearing traps (and arms, delts...)

[pobrecito]

a pic of Ronnie doing this pose will look just as impressive and show just as many details:

No it won't.

[Hulkster]

No it won't.

yes it will:




 also, posing oil helps greatly.

watch the 99 video: ronnie looked much better in the prejudging than in either the posing round or the finals because he was bone dry in both of these rounds.

in the prejudging, he was slick with oil.

compare and you will see what I mean:

[Hulkster]

as you can see, Ronnie did not have nearly enough oil for the even rounds and looked worse as a result.

same thing happened dorian in 94: not enough oil:


made him look worse.

[pobrecito]

Do they not show all of the rounds on the videos?

I have seen pictures from the same routine in different color trunks than was ever on the video

[pobrecito]

Post a ronnie shot matching this

[RocketSwitch625]

are Coleman's calves always this unsymmetrical?

apparently.

yes, what great balance

[NarcissisticDeity]

as you can see, Ronnie did not have nearly enough oil for the even rounds and looked worse as a result.

same thing happened dorian in 94: not enough oil:

made him look worse.

Again you act like you know what you're talking about and you don't , that picture was very small in the magazine and when I resized it it lost quality , the only thing wrong with Yates in 94 was his tan , this is a higher quality scan from the same contest.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Compare this low quality scan of Dorian at the 1994 Olympia with this shot of Ronnie , and its worse for Dorian because he's bent over and not one hint of a gut and Ronnie looking pregnant

[NarcissisticDeity]

I mean seriously

[Bear]

are Coleman's calves always this unsymmetrical?

apparently.

yes, what great balance

Way to post a shot that Dorian could never ever match for size, balance, detail or sheer impressiveness. Ronnie's calves are a decent size there too, and not as criminally mismatched as Dorian's non-arms.