it might be based on 1/10th of the evidence, but so is your anti Ronnie argument.
fact is, there are hundreds of other pics out there for all these contests and most of them will never see this thread.
One thing is clear: as more and more scans and shots of Yates' post tear years come up, the harder it is to argue for his incredible scores being valid.
Hell, as soon as the scans (mostly from you) from bb dungeon were posted, this started to happen.
You couldn't be any more wrong , you're so wrapped up in your bias towards Dorian you're projecting it on me I don't hate Ronnie thats a myth you keep trying to push and its simply not true , I think he's an awesome bodybuilder , I'm a HUGE Flex Wheeler fan yet I didn't complain when Ronnie beat him in 1998 , I think Ronnie looks fantastic in 1999 in 2001 but past that its all down hill
by me commenting on his weaknesses and flaws don't mistake that as ' anti-Ronnie ' I personally feel at their respective bests Dorian would edge out Ronnie , I never once claimed Ronnie is the most overrated bodybuilder of all time and he should have lost at his best , etc
I scanned most of the pics on this thread both BAD and GOOD of Ronnie and Dorian , your opinion on the pictures doesn't constitute evidence when it contradicts the judges nod , Hulkster its this simple 13 different judges unaware of the other scores all came to the same conclusion you will never once be able to counter this , this is check mate on this topic
And post tear 1995 I mean you've got to be kidding me if you don't think he should have got perfect scores in 95 other than the shorter bicep Dorian matches or even surpasses his 93 form , 96 a little less so and 97 he was off !! but reguardless your opinion doesn't trump the judges .