Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3567523 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16450 on: December 10, 2006, 04:40:44 PM »
Huh? lol that didn't make any sence.

I think thats the point lol
Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16451 on: December 10, 2006, 04:43:17 PM »
This thread has become more enjoyable lately with the absence of pumpster.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16452 on: December 10, 2006, 04:44:49 PM »
You have failed utterly to prove that Ronnie's lats were wider than Dorian's in 2003, in the same way thatr you failed to prove that they were just as wide in 1999. I think that they were slightly narrower in 1999 and just as wide in 2003.

::)

Ronnie and Dorian were the same width in 96.



Ronnie added more size from 96 to 99. However, let's just say for argument's sake that his lat width didn't increase at all during those 3 yrs (I'm being generous here). This would mean that Ronnie and Dorian were the same width. There is also a wealth of pictorial evidence that, coincidentally, all show they have identical lat width.









Now Ronnie in 03 was even wider than he was in 99. Even a blind man can see this. It follows that if Ronnie was wider than before, then it also means he was wider than Dorian.




NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83577
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16453 on: December 10, 2006, 04:45:34 PM »
Look at the thickness of Dorian's traps they're insane !

slaveboy1980

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8404
  • Thought is the arrow of time; memory never fades.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16454 on: December 10, 2006, 04:47:10 PM »
to be honest..looking at the pics of the mr olympia with all the guys lined up...they look all pretty much the same if you think about..ok sure some are black some are white etc...i think we all should jump into our own assholes and disappear.
anal escape may be necessary when the world gets over crowded.

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16455 on: December 10, 2006, 04:47:25 PM »
SUCKMYMUSCLE-


Camp Coleman might have failed to prove that Coleman's lats are wider than Yates were, but, in your assertion that you feel that Yates' were a little wider, have you proved this mathematically?

LyricTenor

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 470
  • Athiest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16456 on: December 10, 2006, 04:48:11 PM »
We work with being, but non-being is what we use.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16457 on: December 10, 2006, 04:49:10 PM »
one thing that I think is important is the symmetry of the back.

dorian's traps are uneven and unsymmetrical, while Ronnie's are much better:

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16458 on: December 10, 2006, 04:51:24 PM »
one thing that I think is important is the symmetry of the back.

dorian's traps are uneven and unsymmetrical, while Ronnie's are much better:



It's funny you bring up proportion and symmetry when it works to your advantage....yet you completely ignore the fact that Dorian has superior proportion and symmetry throughout his entire physique.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16459 on: December 10, 2006, 04:51:59 PM »
bullshit, you realized you made a mistake and now you're trying to save face. You claimed the long head is "so small that it's irrelevant" in the back relaxed and rear lat spread. Quit trying to change the subject by talking about the medial or lateral heads, or talking about other poses. Get that through your f*cking head you mental midget. I will repeat myself to let it sink in for you. My issue with you is that you claimed the long head is irrelevant in the back relaxed and rear lat spread b/c it's too small to see.

  Listen, moron, I stand by what I said 100%, and I'm not, I repeat not changing what I said at all. It is you, in fact, who's trying to save face ehen I made you realize just how stupid your argument of the relevance of the long head is. Get it that pea-brain of your:

The long head of the triceps is by no means as relevant as the lateral one, because most of it's mass in concealed due to the configuration of the human body. Get it? The lateral triceps head is visible in full force in an entire mandatory, which is not the case for the other two heads. It is only visible entirely in the front double biceps. That's it! It's an insignificant part of the rear lat spread and in the relaxed round from the back. No one give a shit about it! Only the back part of the long head is visible in the rear lat spread and the relaxed round from the back, you idiot! Geez! ::)

Quote
I'm not talking about other angles, you dipshit. You're the one who brought them up AFTER you realized you made a mistake. Now you are trying to introduce superfluous factors like the medial head and various angles to change the subject.

  What mistake did I make, you moron? What? I made no mistake! The bottom oline is that the long head of the triceps is not relevant from most angles, and it is certainly not relevant in the rear lat spread and the back relaxed round, where it represents and insignificant part of the pose. What I said is 100% correct: most of the advantage in inner and medial triceps heads is only apparent when flexing the arms from the font. You incredible, incredible moron! Why am I even arguing with you? It's obvious that you're so far beneath that it's not even worth it! You act as if I "realized"that I'm wrong, when in reality I stand by what I said 100% and owned you brutally. You sore loser. ;)

Quote
lame retort. How am I a layman when I have to correct you about anatomy? ::)

  When have you corrected me about anatomy? ::) By the way, in none of the pics you've posted Ronnie comes even close to having a lateral triceps head that even approaches Yates. This is compounded by the fact that Diesel also wins the pose from a symmetry perspective. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE



[/quote]

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83577
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16460 on: December 10, 2006, 04:52:30 PM »
one thing that I think is important is the symmetry of the back.

dorian's traps are uneven and unsymmetrical, while Ronnie's are much better:



Grasping at straws again lol nothing and I mean nothing in nature is symmetrical you think Ronnie's left and right biceps are equal ? you think they both measure 23 and 5/16ths in each arm? how about Ronnie's calves ? should I even both posting pictures of those and their miss/match ' symmetry '? keep trying kid.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83577
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16461 on: December 10, 2006, 04:54:29 PM »
one thing that I think is important is the symmetry of the back.

dorian's traps are uneven and unsymmetrical, while Ronnie's are much better:



Man untanned weel out from the Olympia and no oil or lighting and Dorian crushes Ronnie in that shot , look at the traps difference lol oh man !!

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83577
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16462 on: December 10, 2006, 04:55:43 PM »
What kind of person measures things to the nearest 16th of an inch?

You do when it comes to height and you need every 16th lol

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16463 on: December 10, 2006, 04:56:13 PM »
Well it highlights that with Yates that detail can be washed away with the example you used and it gets better with the ones I used and Coleman's darker skin makes it easier to see .

washed away?  ::)

what the hell are you talking about?

yates never HAD any tri detail from the front ever:

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16464 on: December 10, 2006, 04:57:00 PM »
Where did Coleman's lats go in that shot ???

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83577
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16465 on: December 10, 2006, 04:58:49 PM »
washed away?  ::)

what the hell are you talking about?

yates never HAD any tri detail from the front ever:



Whenever you post pics of Yates NOT at his best you spotlight your fear ! lol just like when you omit the bodybuilding criteria that favors Yates you're scared for a reason.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16466 on: December 10, 2006, 05:00:15 PM »
sure ::)



  Nice try, "dipshit". Check out the angles their facing the camera and their proximity to it. Completely different. You can't substantiate the claim that Nasser is wider from the back, for one simple reason: Dorian defeated him with straight-firsts scores in trhe rear lat spread and the back relaxed round when they faced each other, so Dorian is obviously wider. Get the tape measurer, and the difference will be of inches. You're just trying to save face because I made you feel like a imbecile. You once said I'm a high-functioning Down's Syndrome sufferer. Well, the joke's on you, not only becasue there is no such thing as a high fucntioning Down's Syndrome sufferer, but your lack of wit and ability to express yourself logically clearly reveals that you're a high funtioning autistic. Maybe you suffer from Asperger's Syndrome? Who knows... ;D ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16467 on: December 10, 2006, 05:00:48 PM »
Man, Yates' lats were just titanic! :o

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16468 on: December 10, 2006, 05:02:35 PM »
Where did Coleman's lats go in that shot ???
he is on an angle.

Here are his lats in the same pose from the same contest:

Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83577
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16469 on: December 10, 2006, 05:02:36 PM »
 :)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83577
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16470 on: December 10, 2006, 05:03:18 PM »
he is on an angle.

Here are his lats in the same pose from the same contest:



They barely look wider than Flexes  ???

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83577
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16471 on: December 10, 2006, 05:04:49 PM »
Such a picture perfect front latspread , just textbook.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16472 on: December 10, 2006, 05:05:17 PM »
Not to mention Flex is beating Ronnie in that shot - as he did in my opinion in 98 as well. Hell, from the front, I always liked Flex better than Ronnie. Flex wasn't great from the rear though.

Ronnie did not deserve straight firsts in 99

logical?

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16473 on: December 10, 2006, 05:05:27 PM »
I think Ronnie hits the front double bi differently to most people, too.

Like I remarked earlier about the way he hits the rear lat spread and rear double bi. Ronnie drags his arms too high (it looks) which gives the effect of spreading out his lats, and his chest- making them appear thinner than they really are. It's not that his muscles disappear for a moment- we know they're thick as anything- but it's just the way he hits the pose.


I agree with ND when he says that Ronnie is a not-so-great-poser, lol.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #16474 on: December 10, 2006, 05:05:50 PM »
Whenever you post pics of Yates NOT at his best you spotlight your fear ! lol just like when you omit the bodybuilding criteria that favors Yates you're scared for a reason.

why are you so dumb?

you blame every major flaw in Yates' physiqe on the fact that he "was not at his best"

meanwhile, his very best showing ever always has EXACTLY the same flaws:

 ::)

Flower Boy Ran Away