Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3495804 times)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17125 on: December 18, 2006, 02:33:53 PM »
they competed against each other when Ronnie was so infantile he placed 9th through dead last at the Olympia contests.

then, he peaked, and took physiques to another level.

just compare these gallaries, and you will clearly see the difference:

http://www.ironman-israel.com/gallery/coleman.htm

http://www.ironman-israel.com/gallery/yates.htm

Ronnie had a quality to his physique that dorian lacked except in the abs and lower back..

once Ronnie's body filled out and he got razor sharp, it was game over.

That was as simple as it gets, yet ND and his Clik doesn't get it.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17126 on: December 18, 2006, 02:36:05 PM »
they competed against each other when Ronnie was so infantile he placed 9th through dead last at the Olympia contests.

then, he peaked, and took physiques to another level.

just compare these gallaries, and you will clearly see the difference:

http://www.ironman-israel.com/gallery/coleman.htm

http://www.ironman-israel.com/gallery/yates.htm

Ronnie had a quality to his physique that dorian lacked except in the abs and lower back..

once Ronnie's body filled out and he got razor sharp, it was game over.

For a Mr. Olympia he really had a small chest. Where is his chest in this pic? You can barely see it.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17127 on: December 18, 2006, 02:39:57 PM »
I was just asking if they competed in direct competition and who won

:rolls eyes:

Hold on. You are asking a stupid question like that? If you didn't know the answer to that then why are you even posting in this thread? lol. Leave while you still can. Save yourself the embarrassment.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17128 on: December 18, 2006, 02:41:18 PM »
btw, Jay beat Ronnie.  ;D

Thanks for telling us Sherlock.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17129 on: December 18, 2006, 02:44:18 PM »
For those who haven't seen these videos yet.

1999 Mr. Olympia prejudging clip 1



1999 Mr. Olympia prejudging clip 2



1999 Mr. Olympia prejudging clip 3



1999 Mr. Olympia prejudging clip 4



Thanks for the clips. After seeing those clips of Coleman, how can anyone say that Yates is better. It boggles the mind. In fact many people believe that year, Yates probably would of had a hard time even coming in 3rd place. Ronnie, Flex and Cormier all looked better than Yates.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17130 on: December 18, 2006, 02:58:20 PM »
Thanks for the clips. After seeing those clips of Coleman, how can anyone say that Yates is better. It boggles the mind. In fact many people believe that year, Yates probably would of had a hard time even coming in 3rd place. Ronnie, Flex and Cormier all looked better than Yates.

agreed. Although I am not sure Flex could have beaten a 93 Yates in the soft and puffy shape he was in 99.

chris on the other hand...well, chris looked fantastic: 8)

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17131 on: December 18, 2006, 02:59:10 PM »
That was as simple as it gets, yet ND and his Clik doesn't get it.

yup. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that Ronnie was better at his peak.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17132 on: December 18, 2006, 03:01:35 PM »
For a Mr. Olympia he really had a small chest. Where is his chest in this pic? You can barely see it.

very true.

why do you think his most muscular was pitiful most of the time?

because his arms and chest were not so great.

they were passable in 93 though.

Not outstanding. but passable.




Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17133 on: December 18, 2006, 03:02:44 PM »
These pics here and I mean these pics ends the discussion why Coleman has the better back. If you can't see it, then you never will. Coleman matches Yates in thickness, condition, seperation and beats him in both poses hands down.

great comparisons.

notice that even though the ronnie back double bi is shot in colour, it still beats the black and white shot of yates..
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17134 on: December 18, 2006, 03:03:56 PM »
Get in! Look at all those bumps ridges! Dorian don't got that kinda detail going on. His doesn't flare out in this insane way for sure, and Ronnie's arms and insane glutes just cap off the look. Unbelievable!  :o

I think the dorian side is being really stupid for acting like Ronnie's glutes work against him.

the judges have NEVER thought this, and Ronnie has always benefitted from his crazy ass.

it has never ever cost him points.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17135 on: December 18, 2006, 03:07:12 PM »

neither was ronnie.

however, yates was in better condition and didnt have gyno.

owned again, buddy.

yeah, only if "better condition" = "better dough distribution" 8)

ps you missed the point of my post.

the point was made that because Flex, like Ronnie, had better shape and detail than Dorian (and the fact that dorian stomped flex) means that dorian would stomp Ronnie.

problem is, dorian stomped flex because he was wider and much heavier.

the two advantages that dorian had over flex he would NOT have against Ronnie.

Ronnie would be like an enlarged, wider version of Flex

Flower Boy Ran Away

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17136 on: December 18, 2006, 03:10:56 PM »
Dorian has Better:
1)calfs
2)lower lats
3)lower back
4)triceps

Ronnie has better:
1)Quads
2)hamstrings
3)glutes
4)upperback
5)traps
6)delts
7)biceps
8)chest
9)forearms
10)V taper

All of these muscle advantages Coleman have, just looks better on Coleman than Yates advantages, look on Yates.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17137 on: December 18, 2006, 03:20:22 PM »
No he doesn't again you're highlighting your ignorance , at the same weight Dorian actually crushes Ronnie in thickness and density of the traps without question , both are very comparable in terms of lat thickness and sweep , Dorian clearly shows better detail and development of the lower lats , Dorian lats actually insert lower than Ronnie's do , erector spinae Dorian again crushes him in thickness and detail , development and detail of the teres major & minor are a push and the same with the infraspinatus

Dorian clearly has a better overall back than Ronnie to argue to the contrary is futile.

Now you're talking about both guys at the same weight? lol. This thread is to see who has the better back and who is better when both were in their primes, so your post is the exact opposite of what this thread is about. So sorry try again. Now you're the one that is using the same lame posts when you see a better Coleman pic than Yates. Face it, your hero "had" a great back and physique, but it is "not" up to par with Coleman's back and over all physique.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17138 on: December 18, 2006, 03:28:03 PM »
This is why this debate is this long because you insist on slanted comparisons and out right lies , please post pictures of Yates from his best not his worse

and we're talking about who has the best back , you tried and failed with Ronnie has a better back because he has a better taper logic lol Dorian clearly has a better back and if you want arms look at the arms , the biceps , triceps , forearms = ARMS , of and lets not forget the calves as well , hey lets also add some more of the criteria like balance & proportion  ;)

Yates looks amazing there, but why is his waist the same width as his thighs? Where as Coleman's waist is significantly smaller than his thighs.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17139 on: December 18, 2006, 03:38:07 PM »
These pics here and I mean these pics ends the discussion why Coleman has the better back. If you can't see it, then you never will. Coleman matches Yates in thickness, condition, seperation and beats him in both poses hands down.

I love Coleman fans , most of them are very ignorant it can't be coincidence lol what you did is you set a whats called a " straw man " and then you attempt to knock it down and claim a ' victory ' the back double biceps shot is 1) not Dorian's best by any stretch of the imagination and 2) not complete so how you can claim Ronnie beats him in both poses when the entire pose isn't even shown is premature

lets break the back double biceps shot down , in NO way shape or form does Ronnie compare with Dorian in terms of trap thickness & density or separation , Dorian's traps are clearly more defined especially near the top of the neck and at the bottom of the traps are more clearly separated from the lats , they are equal in terms of separation & detail of the teres major and minor as well as the infraspinatus , again the lower lats is where Dorian walks past Ronnie , his lower lats are thicker and you can see the christmas tree in Dorian's back as you can't on Ronnies and the pic of Ronnie you can see more of his lower back than the pic of Yates and this again is another area Dorian is clearly better than Ronnie ! and Dorian is clearly the drier of the two , Ronnie looks like he;s holding water hence why is separations aren't as good as Dorian's , Dorian's back is destroying Ronnies in this comparison

Now lets see what the Official I.F.B.B. Mens Professional judging criteria asks for in the back double biceps pose

The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.


Back Double Biceps (see Figure 4)
Standing with his back to the judges, the competitor will
bend the arms and wrists as in the Front Double Biceps
pose, and will place one foot back, resting on the toes.
He will then contract the arm muscles as well as the
muscles of the shoulders, upper and lower back, thigh
and calf muscles.

The judge will first survey the arm muscles and then do
the head-to-foot survey, during which there are more
muscle groups to look at than in all of the other poses.
This includes the neck, deltoids, biceps, triceps, forearm,
trapezius, teres, infraspinatus, erector spinae, external
obliques, latissimus dorsi, gluteus, thigh biceps, and
calves. This pose, probably more than the others, will
help the judge to determine the quality of the
competitor’s muscle density, definition, and overall
balance.


The judges start off looking for muscular bulk , both Ronnie & Dorian are roughly the same weight in that comparison so muscular bulk looks to be a push , balanced development favors Yates , Ronnie never had great muscular balance , muscular density again Yates look at the density of his traps & lowerlats and definition/conditioning , Dorian wrote the book on conditioning

The judges start with the neck thats a push , deltoids neither have an and overwhelming edge in terms of size , shape and detail push , biceps Ronnie has a clear advantage in biceps its NO contest , triceps Ronnie's are bigger but Dorian's aren't lacking in terms of shape , size or separation , forearms Dorian has better forearms , better shape and balance with his biceps/triceps , trapezius NO CONTEST Yates clearly has better traps I don't need to further elaborate on this ! teres , infraspinatus are EQAUL in terms of detail & development this is a push , erector spinae another clear cut advantage for Dorian , Dorian's christmas tree was always better than Ronnies , Dorian's erector spinae shows thickness & density that Ronnie doesn't , extrernal obliques another advantage for Yates remember the judges are always looking for who has the edge in terms of muscular density in all parts and Yates has denser obliques than Ronnie , latissimus dorsi , both are equal in terms of thickness in their lats as well as sweep however Dorian's lats insert lower into his waist and Dorian can't be matched for thickness and development of the lower lats another clear advantage for Yates , gluteus Ronnie's glutes have more striations yet they're way overdeveloped and compromise his balance & proportion , Dorian's has striations on his glutes but we'll give this one to Ronnie ,  thigh biceps , I love how Coleman fans go on and on about Ronnie's hams , Dorian is NO slouch in this area his are just as detailed and developed as Ronnies this is a push , and calves lol I mean need I say anything? Ronnie in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM compares favorably with Dorian in the calves , not in terms of diamond shape , separation of the gastrocnemius inner and outer heads or separation of the soleus factor in Ronnie total lack of balance & proportion of his lower legs and you have another clear advantage for Yates ! pay attention to this sentence

This pose, probably more than the others, will
help the judge to determine the quality of the
competitor’s muscle density, definition, and overall
balance.


Dorian has the edge in density , definition and overall balance , this is the criteria the I.F.B.B. judges use , this is the standard which competitors are judged upon and according to this criteria Dorian clearly has a batter back double biceps pose DESPITE NOT having better biceps , contests aren't judged on what the Coleman fans think should be favored , there are specifics and they favor Dorian , according to the IFBB judging criteria Ronnie can't beat Dorian in this pose .




NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17140 on: December 18, 2006, 03:39:45 PM »
For a Mr. Olympia he really had a small chest. Where is his chest in this pic? You can barely see it.

Another strawman for you to knock down , where is his chest? right here sport  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17141 on: December 18, 2006, 03:42:01 PM »
very true.

why do you think his most muscular was pitiful most of the time?

because his arms and chest were not so great.

they were passable in 93 though.

Not outstanding. but passable.






Oh another Hulkster gem to add to my favorites lol his most muscular was the most pitiful of all time? LMFAO thats exactly why you cried " morphed pic " when you saw this and check out the side of his arms and the thickness of his chest !!

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17142 on: December 18, 2006, 03:46:32 PM »
Now you're talking about both guys at the same weight? lol. This thread is to see who has the better back and who is better when both were in their primes, so your post is the exact opposite of what this thread is about. So sorry try again. Now you're the one that is using the same lame posts when you see a better Coleman pic than Yates. Face it, your hero "had" a great back and physique, but it is "not" up to par with Coleman's back and over all physique.

I ended the myth that Coleman has a better back with my description exactly why and with quotes from Ronnie who said

DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.

And Samir Bannout who said

Jay Cutler blows the other bodybuilders away with the crisp detail of his muscularity from top to bottom. He has superior calves, hamstrings and glutes. His back is detailed and big, but it does not match up well against Ronnie, who has the second-best back in the history of bodybuilding behind the great Dorian Yates

Ronnie has the second best back behind the great Dorian Yates

And both are known for their outstanding back development lol couple that with my critique of why Dorian's back is better and you have a hat trick !!

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17143 on: December 18, 2006, 03:49:08 PM »
why yes, yes it does:

compared to this:



more...

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17144 on: December 18, 2006, 03:52:48 PM »
Its judged ONSTAGE? I know I've told you this numerous times and guess what? almost straight firsts in EVERY SINGLE ONE OF HIS OLYMPIA WINS ONSTAGE lol he won every round at every contest just not with perfect scores which was one of the posing rounds in 1994

Yes he had perfect scores, I don't know why, but who else but Lee Haney has won 8 Mr. Olympian titles?

Why, that is Ronnie Coleman. Yes, that's right.

Ronnie-> 8, Yates-> 6

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17145 on: December 18, 2006, 03:54:30 PM »
yeah, only if "better condition" = "better dough distribution" 8)

ps you missed the point of my post.

the point was made that because Flex, like Ronnie, had better shape and detail than Dorian (and the fact that dorian stomped flex) means that dorian would stomp Ronnie.

problem is, dorian stomped flex because he was wider and much heavier.

the two advantages that dorian had over flex he would NOT have against Ronnie.

Ronnie would be like an enlarged, wider version of Flex



Points to ponder sport Flex never came close to Dorian and when Flex faced Dorian he was a hell of a lot better in 1993 than 1998 , Dorian in 1993 absolutely crushed everyone he was so far and ahead of everyone the judges didn't even need to call him out in the muscularity round I mean how much more dominant can one get? now fast forward to 1998 Flex is off from his 93 form and almost beats Ronnie in one of the closest Mr Olympia contests EVER 3 points separated Flex & Ronnie the contest could have went either way but they did the right thing and chose Ronnie , now if a Sub-par Flex gave Ronnie just about all he can handle how is Ronnie supposed to defeat with ease according to you a guy who was so much better than a much sharper Flex ?? you can't explain that because its faulty logic , Dorian would crush Ronnie 1998  , 1999 he would be more of a challenge but Yates has to many advantages even for 99 Ronnie and NO bitch-tits lol

and please stop this nonsense that Dorian only beat Flex because he was wider & heavier thats PART of the reason , he also had better density , balance & proportion , conditioning , and he'd still have all those advantages with Ronnie a man who he faced eight times and went down in flames !

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17146 on: December 18, 2006, 03:55:16 PM »
more...

he's carrying water in every single shot lol

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17147 on: December 18, 2006, 03:58:27 PM »
Yes he had perfect scores, I don't know why, but who else but Lee Haney has won 8 Mr. Olympian titles?

Why, that is Ronnie Coleman. Yes, that's right.

Ronnie-> 8, Yates-> 6

LMFAO typical Coleman guy retort

who has a better win percentage rate? Dorian with 88% or Ronnie with 40%? who has ONLY been beaten twice? Yates and who never placed below second in a Professional contest? Yates ? who wasn't beaten TWICE while a active Mr Olympia? Dorian  ;) who had more straight firsts victories? Dorian  ;) who has had more close calls? Ronnie ( four in fact ) who was beaten in the challenge round? Ronnie to Gustavo lol he ' won ' 8 Olympias and half were gifted to him lol

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17148 on: December 18, 2006, 04:05:41 PM »
Glutes far superior in what reguard? being overdeveloped and compromising his balace? sure and superior hams? please explain how Ronnie's are superior to these please. lets NOT forget the judges are always looking for balance & proportion this is another area Ronnie is behind Yates in , lets not just pick the criteria that YOU  think the judges are looking for.

Someone say glutes and hams?

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17149 on: December 18, 2006, 04:09:10 PM »
Quote
Dorian in 1993 absolutely crushed everyone he was so far and ahead of everyone the judges didn't even need to call him out in the muscularity round I mean how much more dominant can one get?

thats not dominance.

thats partial judging.

Flower Boy Ran Away