Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3495788 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17150 on: December 18, 2006, 04:12:15 PM »
he's carrying water in every single shot lol

maybe so.  but Yates carried a whole lot of water when not at his best also:

Flower Boy Ran Away

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17151 on: December 18, 2006, 04:13:36 PM »
He has a bigger ass thats about it  ;) and hamstrings are very comparable you can't argue with this !!

You think?

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17152 on: December 18, 2006, 04:15:20 PM »
Matt elaborate on your opinion that Ronnie has a better back  ;)

They've been doing so from page "1", but you won't listen. It's not that hard.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17153 on: December 18, 2006, 04:15:34 PM »
ronnie's glutes and hams destroy dorian's.

that, like the fact that his arms, quads, chest and delts also destroy dorian's is not up for debate.

now, lets get back to the heart of the debate:

who has better forearms, calves and side head triceps... ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17154 on: December 18, 2006, 04:16:57 PM »
maybe so.  but Yates carried a whole lot of water when not at his best also:



LMFAO @ water lol

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17155 on: December 18, 2006, 04:18:47 PM »
yeah, only if "better condition" = "better dough distribution" 8)

problem is, dorian stomped flex because he was wider and much heavier.

the two advantages that dorian had over flex he would NOT have against Ronnie.

Ronnie would be like an enlarged, wider version of Flex




ronnie was like an enlarged version of flex - when he competed against dorian?

where did that leave him?
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17156 on: December 18, 2006, 04:20:19 PM »
These pics here and I mean these pics ends the discussion why Coleman has the better back. If you can't see it, then you never will. Coleman matches Yates in thickness, condition, seperation and beats him in both poses hands down.


does ronnie's own opinion count?
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17157 on: December 18, 2006, 04:22:14 PM »

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17158 on: December 18, 2006, 04:22:32 PM »
I don't need to ask anyone , look at Yates' traps for depth and thickness , look at the thickness of Yates lower lats , they look like steel cords , Yates cornered the market on density & thickness.

Someone say traps for depth and thickness? Plus his lower back looks amazing.

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17159 on: December 18, 2006, 04:25:13 PM »
with bad lighting, hardly any oil, and no diuretics vs. the contest pic of coleman

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17160 on: December 18, 2006, 04:26:36 PM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17161 on: December 18, 2006, 04:28:45 PM »
Someone say traps for depth and thickness? Plus his lower back looks amazing.

LMFAO is thats amazing this is beyond ! you can't counter my back argument it simply can't be done all the Coleman nutt-huggers before you have tried and failed , keep ice-skating up hill its fun to watch you fall on your face.


IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17162 on: December 18, 2006, 04:29:27 PM »
After seeing those clips of Coleman, how can anyone say that Yates is better. It boggles the mind. In fact many people believe that year, Yates probably would of had a hard time even coming in 3rd place. Ronnie, Flex and Cormier all looked better than Yates.


reality check:

yates beat flex at his best in 93.  flex calls dorian untouchable.  he never said that about ronnie.  in fact, turned his back to the crowd in 99, thinking he deserved to win.

cormier?

yates dominated an in prime flex, kevin, shawn, nasser, and paul.  all of whom were much better at their peak than cormier ever was.  
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17163 on: December 18, 2006, 04:30:05 PM »
Show me a picture(s) where Ronnie has a better developed and detailed lower back and lower lats , Dorian has everything in those pictures and then some.

That's all Yates has on Coleman's back and even in those back parts he is barely beating Coleman. Coleman beats him in the rest of the back, but all you're saying is Dorian has "and then some". We don't see "and then some". We see "none".

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17164 on: December 18, 2006, 04:30:05 PM »
Lights Out, Game Over!!!




NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17165 on: December 18, 2006, 04:33:45 PM »
That's all Yates has on Coleman's back and even in those back parts he is barely beating Coleman. Coleman beats him in the rest of the back, but all you're saying is Dorian has "and then some". We don't see "and then some". We see "none".


I described in detail why Yates has a better back I realize you can't counter this and continue down the path of absurdity with blanket statements that Ronnie just has a better back lol you have nothing for me just like the last 10 Coleman nutt-huggers

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17166 on: December 18, 2006, 04:34:42 PM »
Lights Out, Game Over!!!





lol the lenghts you guys go to , then again you need to.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17167 on: December 18, 2006, 04:37:48 PM »
Look at the upper back  ;)

Someone say upperback?

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17168 on: December 18, 2006, 04:39:18 PM »
That's all Yates has on Coleman's back and even in those back parts he is barely beating Coleman. Coleman beats him in the rest of the back, but all you're saying is Dorian has "and then some". We don't see "and then some". We see "none".

exactly
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17169 on: December 18, 2006, 04:40:24 PM »
Someone say upperback?

Someone say his back overall is not as hard as it was in 98/99?

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17170 on: December 18, 2006, 04:41:17 PM »
which presentation of Ronnie are you speaking of?

I would assume 2003, but I believe his back looked better in 98/9 than in 2003 due to a smaller waist (=better taper) and much better detail.

for shear width and thickness though, no one has yet to match Ronnie 2003.

no one. yet.

screencaps of 2003 vs 1999:



2003, biggest and thickest ever.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17171 on: December 18, 2006, 04:41:32 PM »
exactly

Is that the best you could manage?

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17172 on: December 18, 2006, 04:42:19 PM »
Quote
flex calls dorian untouchable.  he never said that about ronnie

you should really try reading MD.

you will be amazed at what Flex says now that he's not competing against Ronnie...
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17173 on: December 18, 2006, 04:42:31 PM »
2003, biggest and thickest ever.

Biggest and thickest , yet lacking in detail and dryness especially compared to 1998/99 and Yates at his best .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83268
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17174 on: December 18, 2006, 04:43:16 PM »
you should really try reading MD.

you will be amazed at what Flex says now that he's not competing against Ronnie...

LMFAO he said if he didn't retied he would OWN half of Ronnie's Sandows lol how you like me now?