interesting.
Ronnie's back clearly better: better arms, better taper, thick traps, detail, the whole picture.
had it been in black and white, it would look even better.
I love how you make blanket statements that just gloss over everything and then think you've accomplished something , you're funny
Ronnie's back is NOT clearly better its not even a tad better in facts its NOT close at all ! lets start with the back
Yates - traps are in another league all together , Coleman's in that picture in NO WAY shape or form compare to Dorian's in terms of thickness , density and detail
Lats - again Dorian has the clear advantage of having lowerlats , more detail and development in the lower lats coupled with unrivaled thickness , teres major & minor are equal in development & detail
Erector spinae - Dorian always had a much better lower back this like the traps isn't up for discussion
Arms - another blanket statement and pathetic it was , better biceps and thats it period. Triceps are about equal in terms of development and size , and forearms Yates is forearms make Ronnie's look like twigs period , Dorian has better proportion in his arms and better balance because of his much denser and thicker forearms
Delts - Dorian's delts look like canonballs they're just simply way to big & thick and detailed for Ronnie to come close
Taper - I mean seriously this is a straw and a pathetic one at that
and the best of all is that pic is from Ronnie 1996 where Dorian NOT even at his best destroyed this version of Ronnie with ease four times , so you look really stupid right now patting each other on the backs talking about how Ronnie crushes Dorian and its from a year where Ronnie took a dirty beating from Yates , four times that year Ronnie and that back had a crack at Dorian and Dorian crushed him utterly .
man you and your lover just got fucking
OWNED
