Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

Hulkster you've been caught read handed toying with pictures , you're beyond desperate , admit you've been proven wrong and apologize , and we'll move on to your next claim so I can stop you there as well.

what are you talking about "toying" with pictures?

I take the pic, save it, and enlarge it by 150% with office picture manager.

thats not toying with a pic.

thats making it bigger.

[NeoSeminole]

ND why are you trying to claim that the "quality" of the 98/99 comparisons somehow makes them invalid?

you can clearly see the SAME detail in BOTH pics whether there is great quality or not.

hence, virtually the same conditioning.

show any knowledgable person a shot of just their arms, delts, pecs, quads, glutes and hamstrings, and ask them who has better conditioning? I guarantee you that most people would pick Ronnie. ND seems to only looks at the lower back and midsection to determine dryness.

[Iceman1981]

you can barely see the top of ND's head in this pic. Notice its placement.

lol.

[Hulkster]

Nd the pic I used came straight from the IFBB's website.

their version does not have Kevin in it.

[Hulkster]

show any knowledgable person a shot of just their arms, delts, pecs, quads, glutes and hamstrings, and ask them who has better conditioning? I guarantee you that most people would pick Ronnie. ND seems to only looks at the lower back and midsection to determine dryness.

exactly

[NarcissisticDeity]

what are you talking about "toying" with pictures?

I take the pic, save it, and enlarge it by 150% with office picture manager.

thats not toying with a pic.

thats making it bigger.

you fucked with the quality of the pictures to TRY and prove your point and you failed I don't care where you got the pic the bottom line is you reached a new low .

[NarcissisticDeity]

I'm still laughing at this one lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[Hulkster]

you fucked with the quality of the pictures to TRY and prove your point and you failed I don't care where you got the pic the bottom line is you reached a new low .

you don't understand.

enlarging a pic does not remove detail and striations.

everyone can see the comparisons i posted and everyone can see that they show that Peter's opinion of his conditioning between 98 and 99 is wrong.

here is more:

98 pic vs 99 screencap UNTOUCHED:

[Hulkster]

I'm still laughing at this one lol

ND no one understands what the fucking hell you are talking about.

the detail is the same in both lat spread shots...

you are being retarded.

[Hulkster]

blame the IFBB's website for posting a poorer quality shot of coleman 98.

not me.

i just got it from their site.

[NarcissisticDeity]

show any knowledgable person a shot of just their arms, delts, pecs, quads, glutes and hamstrings, and ask them who has better conditioning? I guarantee you that most people would pick Ronnie. ND seems to only looks at the lower back and midsection to determine dryness.

Most people don't have a clue what great conditioning is , evidence you and Hulkster , Hulkster was proven dead wrong about his claim by ME and by someone who was there , he was proven dead wrong about his claim Ronnie has better balance than Dorian by ME , he was proven dead wrong that the 1994 Mr Olympia was the most controversial Olympia since 1980 by ME and a IFBB judge who was there , he was proven dead wrong about Ronnie having a better back by ME , his ' knowledge ' has a lot of growing up to do , especially compared to mine.

[Hulkster]

does anyone other than ND see any sort of a difference in the 98 vs 99 shots I posted in terms of conditioning?

[Iceman1981]

Hulkster wants to suck on that giant nipple 'cause that's the nearest thing he'll ever get to sucking a woman's tit.

You're the only one talking about nipples on here. Seems like you were neglected as a baby. Stop talking about nonsence and say something sensible

[Hulkster]

Most people don't have a clue what great conditioning is , evidence you and Hulkster , Hulkster was proven dead wrong about his claim by ME and by someone who was there , he was proven dead wrong about his claim Ronnie has better balance than Dorian by ME , he was proven dead wrong that the 1994 Mr Olympia was the most controversial Olympia since 1980 by ME and a IFBB judge who was there , he was proven dead wrong about Ronnie having a better back by ME , his ' knowledge ' has a lot of growing up to do , especially compared to mine.

ummm...ND...

pretty much everyone on this thread except you will disagree with almost every line in that post...

[NarcissisticDeity]

blame the IFBB's website for posting a poorer quality shot of coleman 98.

not me.

i just got it from their site.

No I blame you for toying with the quality of the picture to TRY to prove a point , Hulkster McGough was at both contests and was face-to-face with Ronnie , his opiniom trumps yours.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ummm...ND...

pretty much everyone on this thread except you will disagree with almost every line in that post...

No NOT most just you and a few nutt huggers

[Hulkster]

what exactly do you mean by "toying with quality"?

I took the pic from this page:

http://www.ifbb.com/contestresults/mrolympia/coleman/98coleman.html

and enlarged it by 150%.

how is that toying with the quality?

[NarcissisticDeity]

does anyone other than ND see any sort of a difference in the 98 vs 99 shots I posted in terms of conditioning?

Watch the videos its more apparent that his back and midsection isn't as dry or detailed as well as his delts

[Hulkster]

McGough was at both contests and was face-to-face with Ronnie , his opiniom trumps yours.

then where is the proof backing up his opinion?

I have tons of proof in all these comparisons.

Peter has none.

[NarcissisticDeity]

what exactly do you mean by "toying with quality"?

I took the pic from this page:

http://www.ifbb.com/contestresults/mrolympia/coleman/98coleman.html

and enlarged it by 150%.

how is that toying with the quality?

by enlarging a picture the quality suffers making the pic not as good I showed you the difference and I posted those pics in this very thread eons ago and much better quality & size , you know you enlarged the pic of Yates from the 1994 Olympia and posted like its indicitive of how he looked its a pathetic attempt.

[NarcissisticDeity]

then where is the proof backing up his opinion?

I have tons of proof in all these comparisons.

Peter has none.

LMFAO Peter has NONE? he was fucking there ! his word is better than your enlarged pics his experience trumps your lame ass opinion , you internet-fan-boy !! I posted two links to the 98 and 99 Olympias if you can't spot the difference thats your problem , this topic is finished !! you can't counter this ! Check Mate .

[Iceman1981]

ha ha ha, I'm not the person quoting Peter McGough like the bible. My point is that if you dismiss his comment about Ronnie possessing the best back of all-time, then you acknowledge he's not always correct. I could likewise argue that his quote about Ronnie's conditioning is flawed. You must accept both quotes or neither. You cannot have your cake and eat it too.

Now you know why so many people disagrees with this guy. He swears he's a bodybuilding expert.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Now you know why so many people disagrees with this guy. He swears he's a bodybuilding expert.

I never once claimed I was an ' expert ' if you can find where I said that feel free to post it  I may NOT be an expert but I clearly know more than you and Neo and Hulkster and pumpster and Matt combined !!

[Hulkster]

ND this fact is simple:

if ronnie was noticably drier in 98 as opposed to 99 as Peter says,

there should be AMPLE pic evidence of this.

but there isn't.


Hint: if you have to scrutinize a video to search for a tiny difference when you can't see a difference in any of  the pics, it usually means there isn't really a difference at all...


if you need a microscope to see a difference, the difference is insignificant.