Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3486105 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17600 on: December 21, 2006, 07:55:49 PM »
Quote
2. To explain how exactly Ronnie's distended gut would not compromise him symmetry-wise. How can a man who looks pregnant win the symmetry round of a contest is beyond me.


irony alert:

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17601 on: December 21, 2006, 07:55:50 PM »
Cool 94 picture


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17602 on: December 21, 2006, 07:57:21 PM »
Quote
Plus, it's fairly clear on the 98 and 99 videos that Ronnie was more conditioned in 98.

no it isn't.

Ronnie looked every bit as conditioned in the 99 prejudging video as he did in 98.

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17603 on: December 21, 2006, 07:58:04 PM »
no it isn't.

Ronnie looked every bit as conditioned in the 99 prejudging video as he did in 98.



How can I argue with an opinion?

The bottom line is, you are in the minority with that thought.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17604 on: December 21, 2006, 07:59:57 PM »
Quote
Hulkster, give up. Any outsider will give credibility to someone who was at the show over someone posting pictures on the internet.

that would be true if Ronnie was noticably softer in the 99 pics and screencaps.

but he isn't. He looks the same.

if he was softer, it would be obvious and there would be NO pics showing equal detail.

it really is very simple:

if he was softer - it would show up.

but it doesn't.

Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17605 on: December 21, 2006, 08:03:33 PM »
Yates in Japan in 1997. rare pictures.












pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17606 on: December 21, 2006, 08:07:14 PM »
Hardness and dryness is important, but why do people here think that outweighs striations and detail?

Mainly becuase striations and separations are more genetic than harness and dryness. Yates could have been devoid of any fat on his body and still have inferior separations, say in his quads, to Flex, Shawn, or Ronnie in the offseason.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17607 on: December 21, 2006, 08:10:50 PM »
thats because Ronnie eats lesser bodybuilders for lunch 8)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17608 on: December 21, 2006, 08:24:52 PM »
Sir NeoSeminole, you nut-rider, I'm still waiting for you to explain the three things I demanded you to previously:

1. To prove that Dorian's lats were exactly as wide as Dorian's in 1999.

???

Quote
2. To explain how exactly Ronnie's distended gut would not compromise him symmetry-wise. How can a man who looks pregnant win the symmetry round of a contest is beyond me.

simple: Ronnie kept his gut in check when it mattered. I already posted pics of 03 Ronnie during the symmetry round with no distension. Where's the gut?







Quote
3. Provide evidence that a bodybuilder has ever won the rear lat spread and the back relaxed round due to possesin the better inner and medial triceps head, especially considering that only the back part of it is visible in these two poses.

there's no need b/c I never made that claim. I disagreed with your comment that the triceps long head is "so small that it's irrelevant" in the back relaxed and rear lat spread.

Quote
Until you do so, you dumb shit, you have no right to take the moral high ground about anything.

ha ha ha ha, go sit on a traffic cone you little f*ggot. You have been owned thoroughly by just about every member on these boards.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17609 on: December 21, 2006, 08:26:14 PM »
Unfortunately, anything you say holds zero credibility becuase you have no proof of what you claim. I'm not so sure why you can't seem to understand this concept.

  So posting a few pics is proof? Sorry, sport, but Ronnie had a distended gut in 1999, and that's a fact. Wheeler had better taper from the front while standing relaxed, in the as-and-thighs, from the sides and his taper was just as good from the back. Ronnie's clavicles is not that much wider than Wheeler's, but the latter waist is much smaller. Again, go to Ironage and post this shit and no one will agree with you.

  You're so pathetic that you even tried to make the case that I said that Dorian would defeat the 1999 Ronnie in virtue of having beaten Wheeler, when in reality it was Hulkster who said that. Saying that Ronnie had the same attributes of Wheeler at 257 lbs is retarded. Let's do a poll about this, and only you and Hulkster would believe that. ::)

Quote
Oh, and what do you do for a living and where did you get your "degree"?

  I don't see the relevance of this. Frankly, it's none of your damn business. Did I ever ask you what you do for a living? Oh, I forgot, you're a college kid. Are you even out of you teens yet? :-\

Quote
I suspect you will not answer this for fear of being laughed off GetBig.

  Ha ha ha ha ha ha..the newbie just said that I'm going to be laughed out of getbig. ::) No, fool, it is you who will be laughed out of Ironage for saying that Ronnie had a better taper than Wheeler - of all people. :-X

Quote
I have reduced sucky to the true failure that he truly is.

  Ok, troll. ::)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17610 on: December 21, 2006, 08:31:28 PM »
???

  You know what I meant, retard... ::)

Quote
simple: Ronnie kept his gut in check when it mattered. I already posted pics of 03 Ronnie during the symmetry round with no distension. Where's the gut?

  What about all the pics proving exactly the opposite, you idiot?

Quote
there's no need b/c I never made that claim. I disagreed with your comment that the triceps long head is "so small that it's irrelevant" in the back relaxed and rear lat spread.

  Well, but it is irrelevant, considering that only the back part of it is visible from the back. Again, no bodybuilder has ever won the rear lat spread or the back relaxed round on virtue of having a better triceps from the back. This argument is just retarded.

Quote
ha ha ha ha, go sit on a traffic cone you little f*ggot. You have been owned thoroughly by just about every member on these boards.

  And yet, it is you who never addresses any of my points, while I address all you stupid ass comments. No one has owned me and never will. I'm so far ahead of you bitches in this discussion that it's not even funny anymore. Loser. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17611 on: December 21, 2006, 08:50:21 PM »
You know what I meant, retard...

you made a mistake you could have easily corrected yet I'm somehow a retard. You're so pathetic that you have to insult others even when you're wrong. ::)

Quote
What about all the pics proving exactly the opposite, you idiot?

what pics? By all means, please show me these pics of 03 Ronnie's gut during the symmetry round.

Quote
Well, but it is irrelevant, considering that only the back part of it is visible from the back. Again, no bodybuilder has ever won the rear lat spread or the back relaxed round on virtue of having a better triceps from the back. This argument is just retarded.

nice strawman buddy! ;)

Quote
And yet, it is you who never addresses any of my points, while I address all you stupid ass comments. No one has owned me and never will. I'm so far ahead of you bitches in this discussion that it's not even funny anymore.

I'm addressing you right now. In fact, I've probably responded to you more than anyone else in this thread. So I don't know what the hell you are talking about.

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17612 on: December 21, 2006, 09:28:58 PM »
Hardness and dryness is important, but why do people here think that outweighs striations and detail?


people take diuretics to be dry and hard.

they dont take diuretics for striations and details.

i dont think one is necessarily better than the other, but i prefer the dry and hard look.

on page 300 or something, i listed at least 10 bbers who won shows over guys that were more detailed and had more striations. 

just 2 examples, mike francois beating flex at the 94 ac and gunter beating ronnie in 02 at the gnc show.

it seems that the judges reward that dry and hard look that so few people have vs. the striated look. 

why?

dont know, but that what it seems to be - yates has 6 sandows against the highest competition bodybuilding where he beat guys that were more detailed and had more striations. 
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17613 on: December 21, 2006, 09:42:43 PM »
Quote
Wheeler had better taper from the front while standing relaxed, in the as-and-thighs, from the sides and his taper was just as good from the back. Ronnie's clavicles is not that much wider than Wheeler's, but the latter waist is much smaller.


Ronnie is noticably wider than Flex even if Flex's waist is smaller...
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17614 on: December 21, 2006, 09:45:30 PM »
Quote
just 2 examples, mike francois beating flex at the 94 ac and gunter beating ronnie in 02 at the gnc show.

it seems that the judges reward that dry and hard look that so few people have vs. the striated look. 

why?

dont know, but that what it seems to be - yates has 6 sandows against the highest competition bodybuilding where he beat guys that were more detailed and had more striations. 


you are missing the crucial difference:

the reason is simple:

it has nothing to do with the dry and hard look over the striated look.

it was the massive size difference.

Francois was much bigger than Flex, and Gunter was much bigger than Ronnie (at least in 2002).

Thats also the reason why the post tear Yates was so successful (eg. 94).

The judges love mass mass mass.

It has been shown time and time again.
Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17615 on: December 21, 2006, 09:47:04 PM »

Ronnie is noticably wider than Flex even if Flex's waist is smaller...


Suckmydick is simply too easy to prove wrong. For all the shit he writes, all it takes is 1 second to post a picture and ruin his entire retarded argument. I know he will come back saying that Flex wasn't at his best here in 99, however, Flex's taper was actually better in 99 than 93 due to wider lats and basically the same waist size.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17616 on: December 21, 2006, 09:47:56 PM »

you are missing the crucial difference:

the reason is simple:

it has nothing to do with the dry and hard look over the striated look.

it was the massive size difference.

Francois was much bigger than Flex, and Gunter was much bigger than Ronnie (at least in 2002).

Thats also the reason why the post tear Yates was so successful (eg. 94).

The judges love mass mass mass.

It has been shown time and time again.

The criteria calls for it, no?  ::)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17617 on: December 21, 2006, 09:49:32 PM »
 So posting a few pics is proof?

All I have to do is post one picture and that is more proof and credibility than any of your garbage posts ;)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17618 on: December 22, 2006, 11:03:35 AM »
 So posting a few pics is proof? Sorry, sport, but Ronnie had a distended gut in 1999, and that's a fact. Wheeler had better taper from the front while standing relaxed, in the as-and-thighs, from the sides and his taper was just as good from the back. Ronnie's clavicles is not that much wider than Wheeler's, but the latter waist is much smaller. Again, go to Ironage and post this shit and no one will agree with you.

  You're so pathetic that you even tried to make the case that I said that Dorian would defeat the 1999 Ronnie in virtue of having beaten Wheeler, when in reality it was Hulkster who said that. Saying that Ronnie had the same attributes of Wheeler at 257 lbs is retarded. Let's do a poll about this, and only you and Hulkster would believe that. ::)

  I don't see the relevance of this. Frankly, it's none of your damn business. Did I ever ask you what you do for a living? Oh, I forgot, you're a college kid. Are you even out of you teens yet? :-\

  Ha ha ha ha ha ha..the newbie just said that I'm going to be laughed out of getbig. ::) No, fool, it is you who will be laughed out of Ironage for saying that Ronnie had a better taper than Wheeler - of all people. :-X

  Ok, troll. ::)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Wheeler better taper from the front relaxed? I'm not too sure.

MR OLYMPIA 1999 DVD CLIP
 

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83206
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17619 on: December 22, 2006, 12:05:00 PM »
Quote
ou're much dumber than I thought you were , seriously . your dead wrong on this topic and many others

" Dorian Yates is the most overrated bodybuilder of all time "
This is true.

" Dorian Yates should have lost the 1993 Mr Olympia to Flex Wheeler "
I revised my opinion. But he should have lost to shawn in 94

" Dorian's conditioning is a myth "
well, ronnie.'s was better in almost all bodyparts except for abs and lower back.

" Ronnie's calves are more detailed than Dorian's "
in 99, they might be. they were just smaller and had crappy shape.

" Ronnie has better balance & proportion than Dorian "
he does. you are the ONLY one besides Pubic who thinks Dorian "twigs on a redwoood" Yates had great balance.

" Ronnie was just as hard & dry in 1999 as he was in 1998 "
proven time after time after time. And Peter has nothing to back his claims up.

" Ronnie was alteast 10-12 pounds heavier in 1999 than 1998 "
I have seen ronnie's 98 weight quoted as 247 before..

" Lee Labrada had crappy abdominals and calves "
they weren't exactly world class...

" The 1994 Mr Olympia was just as controversial as the 1980 Mr Olympia "
very true.

" Ronnie dominated Jay Cutler from the back in 2001 despite losing the whole pre-judging "
you are the only idiot in history to think that Jay's back in 2001 was anywhere neaer the level of Ronnie's...

" Shawn Ray owns Dorian Yates in the back double biceps shot "
true in 94.

" Nasser was close to beating Dorian "
spoken like a true newbie Roll Eyes In 97 he was close

" Dorian only beat guys who weighed less than him "
nasser almost beat him, Dillet had no back. otherwise very true.

" Dorian has NO quality "
depends on the year..94 wasn't exactly anything to write home about.

" Ronnie is aesthetic "
in 98/99 most people agree with me.

" Dorian has crappy quads "
very true to all but you and pubic.

No you're a LOT dumber than I ever thought lol

1) Not even worth a dignified answer , its one of your more retarded & biased statements

2) You ' revised ' your opinion , more like you came to your fucking senses , and Shawn was lucky to get second nevermind first

3) This is avoiding your original statement , you claimed that Dorian's conditioning was a myth and then you later amended to Ronnie has better conditioning and further added ' in most parts ' you're dead wrong on all three points , Dorian's dryness is legendary , Ronnie may have come close or equaled it in 1998 and thats the ONLY time , Ronnie was never as big AND as dry as Dorian

4) Another retarded statement , Ronnie has bar none the worse calves of ANY Mr Olympia winner and Dorian has among the best of all the Olympia winners , its another completely retarded statement , better detail  ::)

5) Dorian's balance at his best mind you is almost perfect , his arms at his best are huge and in proportion with the rest of his physique , Ronnie has always had poor balance evident even at his best at times its much worse but his balance is NOT comparable to Dorian's

6) This issue is dead and you're the last idiot on the Titanic still saying everything is alright , its been proven BY ME using pics , videos and two seperate quotes from two years , I used two separate back pictures scanned by me at the exact same DPI to ensure continuity and pointed out exactly where he is not as dry or hard , you're in total denial

7) the lowest I've seen Ronnie's weight listed for the 1998 Mr Olympia is 249 pounds and the highest is 250 pounds , either way you're dead wrong when you said he was " 10 to 12 pounds heavier " in 99 vs 1998 , that would put Ronnie at 262 pounds which is wrong , but like McGough's other claims they must be wrong and Hulkster the witless wonder's are correct , when the facts contradict Hulkster's claims the facts must be tossed out  ::)

8) World class? lol his midsection in comparison to Ronnie's is world class as well as his calves ! another extremely ignorant claim that you were proven dead wrong on

9) There was NO controversy with the winner of the 1994 m the second place winner said he got the place he deserved , it was a very tight contest between second & third , the crowd Booed very loudly at Shawn being placed second over Kevin , the scorecards indicate the contest wasn't even close in reality or on paper , Flex magazine Feb 2006 " 15 biggest controversies and shocking moments in bodybuilding history " listed the 1980 and 2001 as the most controversial Mr Olympia contests , yet NO 1994 Mr Olympia , they must be wrong and Hulkster must be right  ::)

Lets see 1994 Dorian wins the prejudging with perfect scores and wins one posing round with a perfect score and wins the other without a perfect score to claim his third Mr Olympia title , 2001 Mr Olympia Ronnie Coleman loses the entire pre-judging to Jay Cutler and wins both posing rounds and the contest , NO previous Mr Olympia winner ever lost the entire pre-judging and came back to win the contest by just 4 points , the crowd Booed as Ronnie was awarded the Sandow

another point you're dead wrong on   ;)

10) Again how does one DOMINATE from the back when you lose the entire pre-judging ? its a retarded statement you can't dominate BY LOSING , its not a matter if Jay's back was anywhere near Ronnie's in 2001 its a matter of overall conditioning and who won the back poses in the mandatory rounds , Ronnie lost the whole prejudging he in no way shape or form DOMINATED Jay Cutler from the back , you can't dominate by losing its a moronic statement

11) Another blanket statement , Shawn Ray owns Dorian in the back double biceps shot  ::) maybe under the Hulkster criteria he owns Dorian in that shot but not in reality or the criteria they use in the I.F.B.B. , one of the requirements is muscular bulk , Dorian outweighed Shawn by 55 pounds of muscle , Shawn doesn't have calves anywhere near Dorian or back width , thickness & density , Shawn is comparable in terms of muscularity & detail in his back and you can see Shawn's biceps better but this is another really , really dumb fucking statements

12) Nasser was NEVER ever close to beating Dorian m NOT even at his worse I could see if the score sheets were close but you have nothing to work with on this , Nasser did look better in the front double biceps shot than Yates in 1997 and he is comparable in the ab-thigh , two poses he lost by the way in 1997 and he gets left for dead from the side and the back , Dorian was never in danger as a Mr Olympia that was Ronnie  ;)

13) You claimed Dorian only beat guys smaller than him , don't backpeddle now and say , well Nasser almost beat him and Dillet had no back , thats NOT the claim , you claimed Dorian ONLY beat smaller guys which is nonsense , Fux , Ferrigno , Harrison , Francios , Dillet , Nasser , Demayo were ALL heavier than Yates , you have nothing to work with as usual

14) Another blanket statement and another retarded statement , he had no quality  ::) don't back peddle now you revised it to ' well in 1994 he was nothing to write home about " another laughable claim , one doesn't win the Mr Olympia without quality its a prerequisite

15) I don't care who agrees with you , most people are like you ignorant about bodybuilding . you can find all the people you want who agree with you it doesn't mean its true , Ronnie was never aesthetic even though he tried to poses to slow music and do aesthetic shots lol Flex magazine's top 20 aesthetic bodybuilders Ronnie was missing from the list , I wonder why? is Ronnie more aesthetic than Yates , absolutely , will he be mistaken for Bob Paris , Lee Labrada or Chris Cormier ? lol not by a long shot

16) Dorian's quads are crappy , at the beginning of this thread you made this claim and Royalty put you in your place real quick , he seen both Ronnie & Dorian live and in person  he called you an internet-bodybuilding-fan he said there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with Dorian's quads , and the only realy problem with his quads were with separation of the rectus femoris , they didn't lack size , shape , detail ( except upper separation ) or balance , and his legs are much more balanced as a whole than Ronnie by far


The fact that you still cling to some of these quotes shows how biased and ignorant you really are , and the lenghts  you go to , to try and back them up is laughable , like the 98/99 conditioning claim , you posted pictures you toyed with to try and prove a point over someone who was live & in person , someone with over 30 years in the bodybuilding game and someone who is the editor of a major muscle magazine and then have the balls to say they're wrong and you're right lol its lunacy !

You have melted down with these statements and you have been owned by a lot of very knowledgeable people on this thread , this is no longer a ' debate ' its random people correcting you and all your bullshit claims , but keep on posting and I'll keep on correcting.  ;)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17620 on: December 22, 2006, 12:27:36 PM »
  Ok, Pubercito, you asked for it. Here is Ronnie side by side with Flex at the 1999 Olympia. Notice that, despite having an obvioulsy thicker waist than at his best, his taper was still superior. Wheeler's entire torso looks like an inversed pyramid, whilst Ronnie's obliques are clearly thicker. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17621 on: December 22, 2006, 12:28:49 PM »
  And equivalent taper from the back... ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17622 on: December 22, 2006, 12:31:08 PM »
  Front lat spread. Notice how Ronnie's and Wheeler's clavicle width is roughly equivalent, yet Flex, although not as wasp-waisted as usual, still has a smaller waist than Ronnie: better taper. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17623 on: December 22, 2006, 12:33:44 PM »
  Front double biceps. Wheeler's taper is at least as good as Ronnie's, if not more. Hint: Ronnie's waist is wider than Flex's, and his lats don't help much. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #17624 on: December 22, 2006, 12:36:44 PM »
  Yeah, Pubercito, Ronnie's taper in 1999 was so much better than Flex's at his best... ::) ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE