Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NeoSeminole]

LMFAO where did you get this number?

Suckmyasshole claims he read in a magazine that Dorian's arms were 52 cm at the 95 Mr. Olympia. This is equal to 20.47" when you convert. It's safe to say that Dorian's grew from 93 to 95, which means his arms were even smaller in 93. I wouldn't be surprised if they were 20".

[suckmymuscle]

stop lying idiot, they were 20.47"

  Like you lying about Nasser's back being wider than Dorian's? Owned.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[NeoSeminole]

Like you lying about Nasser's back being wider than Dorian's?

I don't see how it's considered lying if I'm right.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Suckmyasshole claims he read in a magazine that Dorian's arms were 52 cm at the 95 Mr. Olympia. This is equal to 20.47" when you convert. It's safe to say that Dorian's grew from 93 to 95, which means his arms were even smaller in 93. I wouldn't be surprised if they were 20".

Flex Magazine Jan 1994


quote from Kevin Horton


At all times , he is precisely what he says he is. exaggeration and inaccuracy are not in his nature. Never can you put him on the spot. If he says his arms are 22 inches you can measure them and they'll be 22 inches.

[NeoSeminole]

if Dorian's arms were 21 inches, then Ronnie's arms in 99 must have been 23 inches.

[NarcissisticDeity]

if Dorian's arms were 21 inches, then Ronnie's arms in 99 must have been 23 inches.

And his calves 16 inches 

[suckmymuscle]

I don't see how it's considered lying if I'm right.

  I'm laughing my ass off. The bottom pic is from the 1996 Olympia, when Nasser outweighted Dorian by 30 lbs, and even then Dorian's back was still wider. Everyone knows that Dorian's lats were infinitely wider and thicker than Nasser's. Your argument is so retarded that I'm not even going to dignify it with a response. If Nasser's back was wider than Dorian's, then how did the latter defeat Nasser both in the rear lat spread and back double biceps flat out every time they met? You fucking idiot. Owned.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[NeoSeminole]

And his calves 16 inches

Ronnie's calves looks bigger than his forearms in that pic. I guess that means his forearms are 15 inches.

[NarcissisticDeity]

King Kamali's arms are over 20".  Numbers themselves don't mean much since they don't ask you how big your arms are on stage.

Thank you ! you agree with what I've been saying all along , Yates doesn't need or never needed bigger arms than Ronnie to beat Ronnie .

[NeoSeminole]

you are too easy to defeat

I'm laughing my ass off. The bottom pic is from the 1996 Olympia, when Nasser outweighted Dorian by 30 lbs, and even then Dorian's back was still wider. Everyone knows that Dorian's lats were infinitely wider and thicker than Nasser's. Your argument is so retarded that I'm not even going to dignify it with a response. If Nasser's back was wider than Dorian's, then how did the latter defeat Nasser both in the rear lat spread and back double biceps flat out every time they met? You fucking idiot.

what a dumbass, ask any unbiased person if Dorian's lats look "infinitely wider" than Nasser's. See if they agree with your assertion. It doesn't matter if Nasser outweighed Dorian or not since we are not discussing weight. Also, we're not discussing who won the rear lat spread or rear double biceps. Nice strawman. If you really want to know the reason why Dorian beat him, it's b/c his back had more detail.

[NarcissisticDeity]

sure, Ronnie's calves looks bigger than his forearms in that pic. I guess that means his forearms are 15 inches.

  Ronnie's forearms may not be 15 inches but they sure-as-fuck aren't in proportion with those biceps/triceps ! 

[NarcissisticDeity]

you are too easy to defeat

what a dumbass, ask any unbiased person if Dorian's lats look "infinitely wider" than Nasser's. See if they agree with your assertion. It doesn't matter if Nasser outweighed Dorian or not since we are not discussing weight. Also, we're not discussing who won the rear lat spread or rear double biceps. Nice strawman. If you really want to know the reason why Dorian beat him, it's b/c his back had more detail.

Dorian really beat Nasser because he had a better back and because he was drier ! ontop of simply looking better from the sides and the back.

[haider]

 I'm laughing my ass off. The bottom pic is from the 1996 Olympia, when Nasser outweighted Dorian by 30 lbs, and even then Dorian's back was still wider. Everyone knows that Dorian's lats were infinitely wider and thicker than Nasser's. Your argument is so retarded that I'm not even going to dignify it with a response. If Nasser's back was wider than Dorian's, then how did the latter defeat Nasser both in the rear lat spread and back double biceps flat out every time they met? You fucking idiot. Owned.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

To his defense, a wider back (or a back that measures up well with respect to width-which seems to be the case in the pics) doesnt necessarily make for a better back. If Neo's argument alone was that Nasser could match Dorian on back width then there'd be no disagreement, and the pics he posted dont contradict that claim IMO. However, it is clear that Dorian destroys Nasser from the back with his thickness, detail and superior conditioning.

[NeoSeminole]

Thank you ! you agree with what I've been saying all along , Yates doesn't need or never needed bigger arms than Ronnie to beat Ronnie.

maybe not neophyte Ronnie, but he sure as hell needs arms to beat a prime Ronnie.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Yes, he does not need physically bigger arms to have better arms, and you might say that an uninjured Yates has a more pleasing arm structure than Ronnie, but he lacks the conditioning and size in his arms to compare in my opinion.  It isn't only about shape, not to mention Dorian did sustain some nasty injuries over the years.

I never once claimed he has a more pleasing structure to his arm I claimed he had a better balance between the muscle groups , the triceps/biceps/forearms ! he doesn't lack conditioning thats just nonsense one area Yates never lacked his conditioning , there is no fat or SQ water in these arms , in some pictures his arms look smooth but its NOT because he's not dry !

[NarcissisticDeity]

maybe not neophyte Ronnie, but he sure as hell needs arms to beat a prime Ronnie.

Ronnie's arms were always outstanding in terms of detail and development ! his arms were always ahead of the rest of his physique 

[suckmymuscle]

you are too easy to defeat

what a dumbass, ask any unbiased person if Dorian's lats look "infinitely wider" than Nasser's. See if they agree with your assertion. It doesn't matter if Nasser outweighed Dorian or not since we are not discussing weight. Also, we're not discussing who won the rear lat spread or rear double biceps. Nice strawman. If you really want to know the reason why Dorian beat him, it's b/c his back had more detail.

  Dude, you have been trounced here with your own retarded logic. You don't win the rear lat spread on virtue of having more details on your back. The purpose of this mandatory is to display lat development, and the separations are barely visible in this mandatory. Dorian defeated Nasser because his back was both wider&thicker than Nasser's ever was. Why am I even discussing this with you? Yours is a retarded argument. Nasser was never on Dorian's league when it comes to lat flare or thickness. Wtf? Is there anyone who thinks that Nasser's back was even as wide let alone wider than Dorian's besides this moron No, seriously, I'm curious.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[Iceman1981]

Yup thats Dillett and his back all but disappeared when he did the back double biceps pose.

For a genetically gifted monster like Dillet, his genetics were nowhere found in that back. lol. Genetics must be a bitch when they are against you.

[Iceman1981]

stop lying idiot, they were 20.47"

lol, that was funny shyt.

[NeoSeminole]

Nasser was never on Dorian's league when it comes to lat flare or thickness. Wtf? Is there anyone who thinks that Nasser's back was even as wide let alone wider than Dorian's besides this moron No, seriously, I'm curious.

ha ha ha ha, you twat. Someone just agreed with me that Nasser's lats were just as wide, at the very least, as Dorian's on the last page.

[Iceman1981]

Flex Magazine Jan 1994


quote from Kevin Horton


At all times , he is precisely what he says he is. exaggeration and inaccuracy are not in his nature. Never can you put him on the spot. If he says his arms are 22 inches you can measure them and they'll be 22 inches.

Damn ND. do you just have these magazines right by the computer with highlighting the lines? or you read these magazines all day?

[alexxx]

20 inches is a big stretch for Yates arm measurement. I would say somewhere between 18-19 max!

[NeoSeminole]

I mean, just look at Dorian's "superior" conditioning.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Damn ND. do you just have these magazines right by the computer with highlighting the lines? or you read these magazines all day?

I have all the magazines while NOT handy , select quotes are , this thread is 700+ pages I've saved the quotes for when needed.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I mean, just look at Dorian's "superior" conditioning.

slanted comparison , nothing new from you a magazine scan vs a video still  .