The problem is....Nasser lied about his weight, and also his condition was way off Dorian's especially from the rear. So while Nasser may have weighed 10lbs more, he carried less muscle than Dorian. Clear enough? ...if Nasser truly was more massive than Yates, I'm sure he would have won the contest, as they both look fairly similar.
nasser's arms and quads were both clearly bigger than dorian's.that will account for a weight advantage for nasser right there:I highly doubt Dorian "carried more muscle" than Nasser given the these facts:
I've lost count of the number of times I have seen this picture posted in the last few weeks. It proves that Hulkster's got nothing left.
If Nasser carried more SQ fat & water who and weighed more than Yates who was as dry as it ever got who was really carrying more muscle?
no, it proves that Ronnie's back double bi is the greatest of all time.It has everything dorian's has PLUS a GREAT set of ARMS.something that dorian's back shot lacked (sorely I might add)
you mean "doughy" as it ever got haha
last time I checked, calves were not part of the back...and besides, Ronnie's back has more detail, better taper, better arms and more "lumps" - dorian's back was always much more flat looking in the double bi shot itself.
Retard is out of the gates running in 07 dough this loser
Hulkster, post a picture of Coleman that compares to this head to toe. And mind you, this is Yates at his worst (94). This might very well be the best back picture of all-time
Better arms lol nice twigs for forearms and where is the balanced development the jusges ask for?
LOL you post a pic with dorian's arm showing no detail and all pastry to prove your point...
The photo is technically terrible, fortunately the physique is awesome.I'd agree with Kris about Dorian showing up on stage how he looked a few weeks out. There are some shots of him at around 280 - 285 shredded. That conditioning has not been surpassed.
this may be the greatest bdb shot of all time.coleman is damn close, but his calves ruin the shot.also, yates xmas tree is better and the individual muscles of the back seem to be a bit larger - dorian's traps go down further.
it's a great shot no doubt, but I still think 01 ASC Ronnie beats it.
How can that beat Yates when Coleman is down 10-15lbs, is less conditioned, and less complete? Answer: it cannot
simple: you are wrong. Ronnie was every bit as conditioned as Dorian, if not more conditioned.
it's a great shot no doubt, but I still think 01 ASC Ronnie beats it. He had the size of 99 with the conditioning of 98. His calves weren't too shabby either, and his arms destroy Dorian's.
