Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NeoSeminole]

Nonsense its all dead on back shots your excuses were expected

you keep telling yourself that, buddy. They may be straight on back shots, but definately not delt shots.

[suckmymuscle]

just when you think that the dorian side cannot possibly produce any posts dumber than they have already...

they surprise you with another one...

 

don't even go there. Kevin would get owned by a peak ronnie just like he did at the 1999 Olympia.

  You must be fucking kidding with this, right? Watch the 1995 Olympia posedown. The only reaosn why Kevin lost that year was because a guy named Yates was competing at his all-time best. Again, Kevin would be almost a match for the 1999 Coleman in size, but with a much better and thighter midsection, even rounder and longer muscle bellies, smaller glutes, better calves, bigger delts and pectoralis. He would add to that a level of crisp dryness that Ronnie couldn't touch. I will go further and say that Levrone was the second greatest bodybuilder of the 1990s besides Dorian. Wheeler comes in third.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[Hulkster]

Thats not 95

what difference does it make?

peak Ronnie would own 95 kevin just as bad as he did 99 kevin:

[Bear]

Arnold never had great balance & proportion he had the same problems most guys with high-peaked biceps do , but FYI delts shouldn't be dwarfed in this pose by the biceps/triceps , Arnold like Ronnie had forearms that weren't in proportion with his biceps/triceps too

Well I guess this is where yourself and most of the bodybuilding world differ, seeing that most consider Ronnie's and Arnold's as perhaps the two best examples of arm development in bodybuilding history whereas Dorian's are famously sub-par.

Having biceps which are so poor as to be dwarfed by your own forearms is not ideal balance at all. BodyBUILDING is about having full muscle bellies not equally flat muscle groups.

[Hulkster]

 You must be fucking kidding with this, right? Watch the 1995 Olympia posedown. The only reaosn why Kevin lost that year was because a guy named Yates was competing at his all-time best. Again, Kevin would be almost a match for the 1999 Coleman in size, but with a much better and thighter midsection, even rounder and longer muscle bellies, smaller glutes, better calves, bigger delts and pectoralis. He would add to that a level of crisp dryness that Ronnie couldn't touch. I will go further and say that Levrone was the second greatest bodybuilder of the 1990s besides Dorian. Wheeler comes in third.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

another great misinformative post by sucky...

please.

If you want to continue insisting that 95 kevin would own either of the 98/99 or 01 AC incarnations of Ronnie coleman prepare to be disappointed.

you will lose:

[NarcissisticDeity]

you keep telling yourself that, buddy. They may be straight on back shots, but definately not delt shots.

They're not delt shots? WTF does that mean? his delts are dwarfed in the back double biceps pose I can keep posting pictures to silence you

[Hulkster]

Well I guess this is where yourself and most of the bodybuilding world differ, seeing that most consider Ronnie's and Arnold's as perhaps the two best examples of arm development in bodybuilding history whereas Dorian's are famously sub-par.

Have biceps which are so poor as to be dwarfed by your own forearms is not ideal balance at all. BodyBUILDING is about having full muscle bellies not equally flat muscle groups.

LOL

[Hulkster]

maybe I am missing something here, but this is how an delt/tri/bi complex should look:



not like this:


 

[NeoSeminole]

They're not delt shots? WTF does that mean? his delts are dwarfed in the back double biceps pose I can keep posting pictures to silence you

again, look at the angle of his delts. ha ha ha. I can't belive I'm actually having to explain this to you. For someone who I consider intelligent for a Dorian guy, you certainly aren't representing them well. You claim that Ronnie's massive anterior delt heads overpower his pecs, yet they are being positively dwarfed by his rear delts there. Shots of his delts taken from other angles show that his delts were more proportionate. Bear even posted a better angle of his delts in the rear double biceps in which his shoulders were balanced with his arms yet you insists on posing the most unflattering angles you can find.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Well I guess this is where yourself and most of the bodybuilding world differ, seeing that most consider Ronnie's and Arnold's as perhaps the two best examples of arm development in bodybuilding history whereas Dorian's are famously sub-par.

Having biceps which are so poor as to be dwarfed by your own forearms is not ideal balance at all. BodyBUILDING is about having full muscle bellies not equally flat muscle groups.

WOW great comparison 

No this is where myself and most of the ignorant bodybuilding world differ , and first of all Arnold is know for his biceps development NOT his arms development not his forearms or triceps , Ronnie is known for his outstanding biceps his triceps while huge aren't the best ever not by a long shot and his forearms 

Dorian's biceps aren't dwarfed by his forearms thats nonsense other delusional Coleman fans actually had the balls to say Dorian's calves were to big for his quads LMFAO all of these nonsense claims just highlight your ingorance

Forearms/biceps/triceps and deltoids all in balance & proportion

[RocketSwitch625]

that is interesting. Ronnie has larger delts than Dorian, and his biceps are still more peaked. I smell excuses...

That is one of the worst bodybuilding pics i have ever seen. His delts don't look bigger than Yates' and he can't hit that pose to save his life. He is bow legged and his front lats are too small for the rest of his upper body. What a joke.

[Matt C]

ND: Dennis Newman looked way better from an aesthetic standpoint.

No offense.

[NarcissisticDeity]

again, look at the angle of his delts. ha ha ha. I can't belive I'm actually having to explain this to you. For someone who I consider intelligent for a Dorian guy, you certainly aren't representing them well. You claim that Ronnie's massive anterior delt heads overpower his pecs, yet they are being positively dwarfed by his rear delts there. Shots of his delts taken from other angles show that his delts were more proportionate. Bear even posted a better angle of his delts in the rear double biceps, which his shoulders were balanced with his arms yet you insists on posing the most unflattering angles you can find.

In that particular pose the back double biceps pose its obvious that Ronnie's delts are smaller than his biceps triceps , it all depends on the pose , now change the pose side chest his front & side delts are overdeveloped IN THIS POSE so much so they obscure his pecs , his pecs aren't small either thats the funny part

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND: Dennis Newman looked way better from an aesthetic standpoint.

No offense.

I know Ronnie was never aesthetic in the classic sense but certainly more so than Dorian

[NeoSeminole]

Dorian's arms look embarrassingly small in these pics.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dorian's arms look embarrassingly small in these pics.

I mean get serious

[Hulkster]

Dorian's arms look embarrassingly small in these pics.

what do you mean, those pics?

LOL


"Where the bloody hell is it?!?" LOL

[NeoSeminole]

In that particular pose the back double biceps pose its obvious that Ronnie's delts are smaller than his biceps triceps , it all depends on the pose , now change the pose side chest his front & side delts are overdeveloped IN THIS POSE so much so they obscure his pecs , his pecs aren't small either thats the funny part

wrong, an example of Ronnie's delts looking in proportion to his arms in the rear double biceps was already posted by Bear. However, like a predictable fool, you ignored it and kept posting the most unflattering shots you can find.

[NeoSeminole]

I mean get serious

oh piss off you mental midget. Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound when you say that 20" calves are worse of a symmetrical liability than 20" arms?

[NarcissisticDeity]

wrong, an example of Ronnie's delts looking in proportion to his arms in the rear double biceps was already posted by Bear. However, like a predictable fool, you ignored it and kept posting the most unflattering shots you can find.

Ironically he's NOT doing the pose correctly he's leaning back , straight on its obvious

[Hulkster]

Dorian's biceps aren't dwarfed by his forearms thats nonsense

maybe not dwarfed but certainly well undersized for his tris and forearms (and delts).

[NarcissisticDeity]

oh piss off you mental midget. Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound when you say that 20" calves are worse of a symmetrical liability than 20" arms?

20 inch calves? LMFAO kid go away and come back when you carry some weight now you're speculating on one - Ronnie's calve size and two - Dorian's arm size and to quote someone who once said the judges don't bring tape measures to the contest 

[NeoSeminole]

Ironically he's NOT doing the pose correctly he's leaning back , straight on its obvious

wow, really? No shit. That's how he does that pose. It's like saying "Dorian never had a flat midsection. That's a myth. He's just sucking it in when he poses."

[Hulkster]

ND how in the hell can you go on and on about how Ronnie 'barely' beat Flex in 1998 and then post shots of Ronnie just destroying flex from head to toe?

 

don't you think that just maybe he should have won by a much wider margin?

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

maybe not dwarfed but certainly well undersized for his tris and forearms (and delts).

wrong you're to used to look at Ronnie's overdeveloped biceps/triceps and prefer that and think anything that doesn't compare is underdevloped unprefeable , much to learn