Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3483972 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21225 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:38:42 AM »

3 different Ronnie's all from the same contest , lol guess which one is the real Ronnie lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21226 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:44:46 AM »

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21227 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:52:56 AM »

Forced-reps new screencap V a photograph from Flex magazine

the shadow · « **Reply #21228 on:** January 18, 2007, 02:05:23 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 14, 2007, 10:20:47 PM

what year is this from? Dorian looks more detailed than I've seen him.

i laughed my ass off when i saw this pic..ahahahahahahhahahah

the shadow · « **Reply #21229 on:** January 18, 2007, 02:16:09 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 14, 2007, 04:35:52 PM

Oh yes Ronnie is an aesthetic masterpiece lol kid go away

hahahahahahahahahhahh...omg i had tears in my eyes laughing at this comment

Bear · « **Reply #21230 on:** January 18, 2007, 02:32:11 AM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on January 17, 2007, 10:55:32 PM

Bow legged:

If that's bow legged I'd take it over this,

Where's the fullness?

Bear · « **Reply #21231 on:** January 18, 2007, 02:34:10 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 18, 2007, 01:52:56 AM

Forced-reps new screencap V a photograph from Flex magazine

So the lighting has been manipulated. Is using b/w any different? Dorian's only remarkable shots are in b/w.

pobrecito · « **Reply #21232 on:** January 18, 2007, 05:56:32 AM »

Quote from: Bear on January 18, 2007, 02:34:10 AM

So the lighting has been manipulated. Is using b/w any different? Dorian's only remarkable shots are in b/w.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21233 on:** January 18, 2007, 08:30:09 AM »

Quote from: Bear on January 18, 2007, 02:34:10 AM

So the lighting has been manipulated. Is using b/w any different? Dorian's only remarkable shots are in b/w.

I disagree all color and all remarkable

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21234 on:** January 18, 2007, 08:31:53 AM »

again all color all remarkable

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #21235 on:** January 18, 2007, 11:41:19 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 17, 2007, 05:56:15 PM

The Dorian side has been kicking your ass for 860 pages

I have never seen another bodybuilder in history look as big as this:

Shockwave · « **Reply #21236 on:** January 18, 2007, 12:00:49 PM »

Dorian 95 has, hands down, the best back I have ever seen.

pobrecito · « **Reply #21237 on:** January 18, 2007, 12:56:09 PM »

No comparison whatsoever...Coleman is soft and mushy; Yates is hard and separated.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21238 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:03:03 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 18, 2007, 12:56:09 PM

No comparison whatsoever...Coleman is soft and mushy; Yates is hard and separated.

There really isn't even with the new screencaps he's still not as dry as 98 or as hard and he's NOT in Dorian's league of hardness , density and size , Ronnie gets ' soft ' above 250 pounds

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21239 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:16:51 PM »

I mean get serious NO contest

pobrecito · « **Reply #21240 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:24:30 PM »

Hulkster now has absolutely nothing to work with considering that we finally have accurate screencaps of what you would have seen had you been sitting at the show. Hell, put anyone on a pitch black background and they will look great; this is why the 99GP lighting is so heralded.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #21241 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:31:29 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 17, 2007, 08:02:09 PM

Ronnie is about 295 here...yet his lats still look small from the front, they don't pop and they don't look full at all. This is the main reason why Yates wins the front lat spread. Moreso than probably any other pose focuses on the bodypart of that particular pose, the front lat and rear lat spreads emphasize the lats overwhelmingly.

I think they are equall in lats. But what you fail to realize is the lats are not the only body part shown in this pose. Notice how Dorian chest, delts and arms in all of those poses are smooth as a babies a$$.

Shockwave · « **Reply #21242 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:37:00 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on January 18, 2007, 01:31:29 PM

I think they are equall in lats. But what you fail to realize is the lats are not the only body part shown in this pose. Notice how Dorian chest, delts and arms in all of those poses are smooth as a babies a$$.

Why don't you ask Munzer how many contests striations won him?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21243 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:40:13 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on January 18, 2007, 01:31:29 PM

I think they are equall in lats. But what you fail to realize is the lats are not the only body part shown in this pose. Notice how Dorian chest, delts and arms in all of those poses are smooth as a babies a$$.

Notice how they appear smooth , it doesn't mean they are and you're right there are more to this shot than just lats , like density , balance and presentation , not to mention conditioning and size , Yates covers all these bases better than Ronnie

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #21244 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:42:16 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on January 17, 2007, 11:00:32 PM

Smooth as a baby's ass:

Like "you" said. It's just one white mans opinion.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #21245 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:44:43 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 18, 2007, 01:18:43 AM

He actually looks worse in these lol thanks for posting

Looks good to me. I can see more detail. Thanks for your opinion anyway.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21246 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:46:40 PM »

Same year , Dorian's chest is covered in striations , so again when people say his chest is smooth in this pose it implies he's carrying water and he's NOT . Dorian doesn't carry water .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21247 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:49:02 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on January 18, 2007, 01:44:43 PM

Looks good to me. I can see more detail. Thanks for your opinion anyway.

He does look good but he's not as dry or hard as 98/01 ASC

Hulkster · « **Reply #21248 on:** January 18, 2007, 01:58:14 PM »

Quote from: Bear on January 18, 2007, 02:34:10 AM

So the lighting has been manipulated. Is using b/w any different? Dorian's only remarkable shots are in b/w.

but the lighting has not been manipulated.

a photographers photo will look different than a still from a moving picture.

hopefully, these new fantastic screencaps can put away this 'fake/enhanced/altered' bullshit.

Ronnie was in a whole different league than dorian.

sorry:

Hulkster · « **Reply #21249 on:** January 18, 2007, 02:01:41 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 18, 2007, 01:16:51 PM

I mean get serious NO contest

it is no contest - in the lower back ONLY.

LOL

you focus in on dorian's small advantages and ignore the 90% of the body that he loses out on LOL