dorian is missing an arm thus losing symmetry from the jump. his quads are smooth as shit with no seperation. his calves are wider then his quads in that pic, another major imbalance. the two most important muscles in bodybuilding would have to be back(definitly) and perhaps quads or arms. dorian has no quads and piss poor arms for a mr o.
HE IS MISSING A BICEP THUS HE IS UNBALANCED TO THE MAX. FIGURE IT OUT.
stop using every excuss in the book, bad lighting, photographer said it was a bad pic, you posted the pic, stop whining he looks like shit. so are you saying that that most muscular trumps this one, honestly, tell me why. dorian is missing a bicep for one, so your balance argument is retarded. his arms are not in proportion with his torso nor his calves with his quads. ronnie wins this pose soundly, by better condtion for one, with better detail, dryness, size , shape, balance,proportion and symmtry.
I like when you type because its easy to assess your knowledge and its not much
1) Dorian is NOT missing an arm , he has one bicep shorter than the other and not by much and this does NOT effect ' symmetry ' in the bodybuilding context its apparent you don't know what they mean by symmetry
2) Dorian's quads are NOT smooth as shit , this implies there is subcutaneous water or fat in the muscles and Dorian is as dry as a bodybuilder can be , the ONLY problem with Dorian's quad separation is his rectus femoris , his vastus lateralis is separated as well as the vastus medialis as is the satorius
3) I laughed out loud when I read that his calves are wider than his quads , you're and idiot its that simple and why? because the picture was taken down looking up its the angle of the shot you dolt ! his calves are wider than his quads give me a fucking-break and talk about irony a Coleman fan commenting on lower-leg imbalance that just boogles the mind , you're actually criticizing Dorian's calves , when Ronnie has NONE
4) the two most important muscles in bodybuilding are the back and perhaps arms & quads ? according to whom ? you? Dorian's back is better than Ronnie's period end of sentence , Ronnie knows this , you need to lean it , Dorian has no quads? Hulkster-type nonsense blanket statement , and he has no arms? NO arms? another blanket statement , Ronnie may have much better biceps and bigger triceps however to say Dorian has ' no arms ' again screams " hey look how little I know " Dorian's arms as a whole have much better balance & proportion , Dorian's biceps are okay , his triceps smoke Ronnie's in terms of shape and separation and his forearms are better shaped and match the rest of his arms , learn this
5) He's missing a bicep so he's unbalance to the max? he's NOT missing a bicep , one is shorter than the other this doesn't effect balance it would effect right/left exactness otherwise known as symmetry but NOT symmetry used in the bodybuilding context which means balance & proportion , learn what poor balance is
Ronnie calves to small ( and overdeveloped ) for his quads which are oversized thus throwing off his lower-leg balance , factor in grossly overdeveloped glutes that stick out way to far and can be seen from the front , this is NOT great muscle balance & proportion
Ronnie' s bicep & triceps are NOT in proportion with his forearms which lag behind , now factor in his delts being overpowered ( in the back double biceps ) by his biceps/triceps this is NOT great proportion
Look no further than the side chest pose his overdeveloped front & side delts obscure his pecs hurting this shot , this is NOT great balance & proportion
6) you want to know why Dorian beats Ronnie in the most muscular ? better muscular balance , better muscular density , and by far and above better conditioning , especially compared to 2003 you actually had the balls to type this
ronnie wins this pose soundly, by better condtion for one, with better detail, dryness, size , shape, balance,proportion and symmtry. This is retard posting on a Hulkster-scale by far ! one you typed the same shit over and over and it all means the same , conditioning is dryness and in no way shape of form does Ronnie 2003 compare favorably in terms of extreme muscle dryness and muscle hardness , better detail? not quite not in 03 , and size yes but he's holding water and this would be clearly evident standing next to Dorian , dry Ronnie 2003 out I mean really dry him out in 2003 and he would NOT be 287 pounds so he has more size yes but his it more conditioned size? NO shape? in some parts YES and in some parts NO , balance & proportion are SYMMETRY you're trying to repeat the same thing over and over like its a new entity and its NOT symmetry in the bodybuilding context is muscle balance and muscle proportion and the ironic part is 2003 Ronnie's balance and proportion is at his absolute ALL-TIME worse and the irony is you thing he's balanced
You're knowledge ( like Hulksters , pumpsters , Neoseminoles ) is very limited , you've exposed yourself as ignorant to how professional bodybuilding contests are judged and the criteria they use and there is NOTHING wrong with be ignorant but it goes wrong for you ( and them ) when you type matter-of-factly then it gives me prime opportunities to correct you and thats exactly why this thread is so long , because I keep correcting all you're mistakes
