If you did a magnetic ressonance imaging of the 1995 Dorian vs the 1999 Coleman, I'm willing to bet my bank account - a hefty sum - that Dorian had considerably less water both inside as well as outside his muscles.
and that is one of the many reason why the dorian side's argument is flawed.
bodybuilding competition is not based on mathematics, body fat percentages or magnetic resonance.
it is solely based on appearence.
and, like I said, dorian may have looked GREAT standing next to nasser and kevin.
standing next to Ronnie 99 he would have not had such an easy time...
in fact, he would probably lose for the very same reasons (only more of them) that dorian lost to haney:
-relatively the same size
-but with better symmetry/lines/proportion
-and with a better shape and a good back
(recall that haney also dominated from the back just like dorian did and ronnie after him)
-a lot of people say that dorian won the contests from the back.
well, Ronnie, unlike dorian, was just as good from the back as he was from the front.