Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3518792 times)

Hulkster · « **Reply #24150 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:31:14 AM »

ronnie's arms and delts make roland's look smooth and watery.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24151 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:35:08 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 18, 2007, 08:31:14 AM

ronnie's arms and delts make roland's look smooth and watery.

See you have something to work with on the biceps/triceps , they delts you're out of your mind , Rolands are covered in striations and show just as good separation if not better and he has Ronnie covered in traps , entire chest and midsection

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24152 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:35:25 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 18, 2007, 08:26:32 AM

No by a long shot , Roland's chest , delts , traps and whole midsection are destroying Ronnie with ease and Ronnie has an edge in biceps/triceps that doesn't compensate for everywhere else he's lacking

so much bullshit. You see whatever you want to see and then convince yourself that you are right. Roland is most certainly not destroying Ronnie in chest, let alone delts. Ronnie's pecs have more detail from top to bottom. Roland's chest looks impressive b/c he has those deep striations. It comes down to personal preference. Ronnie's front delt head is the size of Roland's medial head - his delts are that much larger. He also has better definition in his shoulders.

Hulkster · « **Reply #24153 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:35:38 AM »

I mean, seriously.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24154 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:37:29 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 18, 2007, 08:35:25 AM

so much bullshit. You see whatever you want to see and then convince yourself that you are right. Roland is most certainly not destroying Ronnie in chest, let alone delts. Ronnie's pecs have more detail from top to bottom. Roland's chest looks impressive b/c he has those deep striations. It comes down to personal preference. Ronnie's front delt head is the size of Roland's medial head - his delts are that much larger. He also has better definition in his shoulders.

I love how you claim I see what I want to see and then in the same sentence type Ronnie's pecs have more detail lol I guess we both see what we want to see

I see Ronnie get quite easily owned in this pose but a guy who couldn't place top 10 at the Olympia

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24155 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:38:33 AM »

Ronnie and his sunken chest easily beaten by Levrone in 2002

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24156 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:40:34 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 18, 2007, 08:37:29 AM

I love how you claim I see what I want to see and then in the same sentence type Ronnie's pecs have more detail lol I guess we both see what we want to see

alright, I count 4 striations on Roland's right pec. Now you tell me how many striations you see on Ronnie's.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24157 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:41:02 AM »

Kevin showing Ronnie how its done

Hulkster · « **Reply #24158 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:41:16 AM »

Quote

I see Ronnie get quite easily owned in this pose but a guy who couldn't place top 10 at the Olympia

the irony of this statement coming from ND is unreal:

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24159 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:44:14 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 18, 2007, 08:40:34 AM

alright, I count 4 striations on Roland's right pec. Now you tell me how many striations you see on Ronnie's.

lol you can't count the striations you fool for either of them lol now you're getting desperate , Roland is a guy who couldn't place top 10 at the 1994 Mr Olympia and he's owning Ronnie in what is considered among his best showings ever , Rolands chest looks better than Davy Jones locker that Ronnie has

Hulkster · « **Reply #24160 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:44:24 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 18, 2007, 08:41:02 AM

Kevin showing Ronnie how its done

and ronnie showing kevin how its done:

ND, you are truly stupid for launching this crusade against ronnie's most muscular.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24161 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:45:20 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 18, 2007, 08:41:16 AM

the irony of this statement coming from ND is unreal:

It gets better

Quote Ironaman Jan 1995 former IFBB Judge Roger Schwab 1994 Mr Olympia

" Best Most Muscular - Yates. When he poses , everything explodes. "

" Best Chest - Yates and Levrone-torn pec and all. "

" Best Legs - Yates from top to bottom "

" Best Back - Yates. He has too much back to be compared. "

Hulkster · « **Reply #24162 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:45:48 AM »

sorry roland:

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24163 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:47:39 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 18, 2007, 08:44:24 AM

and ronnie showing kevin how its done:

ND, you are truly stupid for launching this crusade against ronnie's most muscular.

I didn't launch it

and get over it cry baby some people simply have a better most muscular than Ronnie , you think Ronnie looks the best in every single pose ever hit lol he doesn't and I just provided visual proof , so Justin Timberlake and cry me a river

Hulkster · « **Reply #24164 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:49:07 AM »

I mean, seriously...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24165 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:49:55 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 18, 2007, 08:45:48 AM

sorry roland:

lol Sorry Ronnie

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24166 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:50:30 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 18, 2007, 08:49:07 AM

I mean, seriously...

Thats a terrible pic lol

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24167 on:** February 18, 2007, 08:54:48 AM »

bwahahahhaha, you know ND is getting desperate when he starts posting these skewed comparisons. Then he has the audacity to criticize others'.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24168 on:** February 18, 2007, 09:03:34 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 18, 2007, 08:54:48 AM

bwahahahhaha, you know ND is getting desperate when he starts posting these skewed comparisons. Then he has the audacity to criticize others'.

That was a shot at you guys , well the 1995 Coleman V Dorian one was

and again what part of " I didn't resize either pic so as to NOT compromise the scale " didn't you get? I can help you on that just let me know

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24169 on:** February 18, 2007, 09:16:11 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 18, 2007, 09:03:34 AM

That was a shot at you guys , well the 1995 Coleman V Dorian one was and again what part of " I didn't resize either pic so as to NOT compromise the scale " didn't you get? I can help you on that just let me know

I wasn't referring to the scaling of the comparisons. Way to assume things.

You purposely used the worst shot of Ronnie that you could find in the first comparison. That's supposed to be his best conditioning ever, yet he looks completely devoid of any detail b/c the pic is so blurry.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24170 on:** February 18, 2007, 09:20:06 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 18, 2007, 09:16:11 AM

I wasn't referring to the scaling of the comparisons. Way to assume things.

You purposely used the worst shot of Ronnie that you could find in the first comparison. That's supposed to be his best conditioning ever, yet he looks completely devoid of any detail b/c the pic is so blurry.

It was picked because the first one someone cried about the angle , I fixed it with a proper angle and once again people are crying lol I purposely choose the same angle

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #24171 on:** February 18, 2007, 09:31:15 AM »

Quote from: IceCold on February 17, 2007, 11:57:10 PM

other people have had a better most muscular than coleman.

-fux
-ruhl
-sergio (that's for you pumpster)
-roland cziurlok
-gustavo
-nasser
-kevin
-dillet

the list goes on and on.

NO ONE has/had a better side triceps than yates

i know that the entire contest/mr. olympia, is not decided on the side tricep pose. but why do you keep referencing the most muscular thinking that is the sole determinant of the contest???

All of those guys had good mm's, but None of those guys had better a mm than Coleman. All of them had huge size, but none of them was seperated, striated, ripped as Coleman was. When you put those together with the shape and size of Coleman had, Coleman has a better mm.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24172 on:** February 18, 2007, 09:33:31 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 18, 2007, 09:20:06 AM

It was picked because the first one someone cried about the angle , I fixed it with a proper angle and once again people are crying lol I purposely choose the same angle

monster bullshit.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #24173 on:** February 18, 2007, 09:51:50 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 18, 2007, 08:16:53 AM

Countdown to the excuses part two.....3.......2......1

Coleman is killing him there. Are you blind? Can't you see that? You are just insane to make that comparison and think Coleman is losing. What a joke.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #24174 on:** February 18, 2007, 09:53:29 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 18, 2007, 08:20:23 AM

Dennis James just schooling Ronnie in a proper most muscular

First of all, Coleman is standing further away from the camera and Coleman has better seperation, shape and striations than James there.