Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3527922 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24225 on: February 18, 2007, 02:33:04 PM »
  Sperm got owned by me and two other guys in a single page. What a loser. By the way, I love your avatar, NarcissisticDeity. Maybe we should start a thread on Natalie Portman instead, and stop arguing about oiled up guys in thongs... ;D ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

You can see my avatar? I can't lol

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24226 on: February 18, 2007, 02:44:16 PM »
Idiot. What creates taper? It is the differential in width between the torso and the waist. In the front relaxed round, the taper is created by the delts, because it is the widest part of the torso in evidence. That's why broad sholders are appreciated in men: they give you taper. You don't need a PhD in quantum mechanics to understand this. Between two men with similar waists, the one with the broadest shoulders has the best taper. Duh!

wrong, you f*cking idiot. Taper is created by the width of the lats in relation to the waist. Usmokepole already did an excellent job owning you with the correct definition of taper.

Quote
and since I never claimed that Dorian's arms were exactly 21", then you can't say that I'm wrong.

oh my, how easy it is to make you look like a fool. ;)

Dorian's arms were 21" at his best.

Quote
Are you myopic? Because in all seriousness, the pic is not that small. In any case, I can get it scaled up just to embarass you. Do you want to go down that road? I also have pics of Flex at the 1993 IPI, and if you piss me off I'll scan all those pics and post them here and make you look like a moron by showing Flex with a taper that Ronnie could never touch.

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Hey everybody, Suckmyasshole claims this pic is not small.


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24227 on: February 18, 2007, 02:46:26 PM »
Take away Ronnie's overdeveloped biceps/triceps and you're left with a excellent back but it looks a lot smaller now


wtf, why is the pic blurry?

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24228 on: February 18, 2007, 02:48:32 PM »
You're getting frustrated as well lol no one has the balls to claim Dorian is aesthetic , you people have the balls to claim he is big difference

yawn ::)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24229 on: February 18, 2007, 02:49:25 PM »
Melodrama doesn't prevent the truth from being seen his back isn't that big is it? especially in that pose?

what the fuck are you talking about?

look at how big it is compared to other bodybuilders:

 ::)

God damn you are even dumber than Icecold :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24230 on: February 18, 2007, 02:49:51 PM »
wtf, why is the pic blurry?

I don't know I didn't resize it just blacked out the arms

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24231 on: February 18, 2007, 02:51:02 PM »
what the f**k are you talking about?

look at how big it is compared to other bodybuilders:

 ::)

God damn you are even dumber than Icecold :-\

Oh jesus he's not closer to the camera and Hulkster at best he was 247 pounds his back wasn't at its widest and thats apparent and the small waist helps too

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24232 on: February 18, 2007, 02:51:37 PM »
wtf, why is the pic blurry?

I'm not at all surprised coming from the dorian side.

they have quite the reputation posting blurry ronnie pics in order to hide detail...remember all the blurry 99 Ronnie shots?

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24233 on: February 18, 2007, 02:53:51 PM »
I'm not at all surprised coming from the dorian side.

they have quite the reputation posting blurry ronnie pics in order to hide detail...remember all the blurry 99 Ronnie shots?

 ::)

Its so easy to make you look foolish remember the resized Dorian pics you made? lol remeber how blurry they were? you're a hypocrite through and through

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24234 on: February 18, 2007, 02:55:55 PM »
Hulkster the hypocrite just posted this two pages ago lol and he's bitching about quality? owned  ;)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24235 on: February 18, 2007, 02:57:03 PM »
Ronnie's back was never this hard, dry, conditioned, separated, or thick. Ronnie's back is dough in comparison.

I suppose I shall post a pic of Ronnie's arms and claim Dorian's were never that hard, dry, conditioned, separated, or thick? The Ronnie fans aren't arguing that Ronnie's back was more conditioned than Dorian's, rather they are saying the difference wasn't much. Dorian's back had slightly better definition but he also sacrificed a lot of thickness. His back looks flat as a pancake next to Ronnie's. Now compare them from the front, and Ronnie destroys Dorian in dryness, conditioning, separations, striations, and taper.

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24236 on: February 18, 2007, 02:59:14 PM »
wrong, you f*cking idiot. Taper is created by the width of the lats in relation to the waist. Usmokepole already did an excellent job owning you with the correct definition of taper.

  Who said the bodybuilding definition is the same one of the dictionary? Are you saying that, between two men who equally sized waist, the one with the broadest shoulders does not have a better taper when both are seen standing relaxed from the front? ::) ::) ::) ::) Are you saying that the lats are a factor in creating taper in the front relaxed round? ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) What a tool you are.

Quote
oh my, how easy it is to make you look like a fool. ;)

  Nice try, but I said that his arms were 21" at his best, not exactly 21". Otherwise, the sentence would read like this:

  "At his best, Dorian's arms were exactly 21".

  When I said 21", I menatally rounded it up from the figures of 52 and 53 centimeters I saw in print, as well as the several bodybuilding writers who mentioned Dorian's arms as being 21". I'm sure that none of those bodybuilding writers said that Dorian's arms were exactly 21"; like me, they realized that Dorian's arms were closer to 21" than to any other rounded figure, so they rounded it to 21". That's much easier than saying:

"At his best, Dorian's arms were 20.87""

  That would be just fucking stupid and pointless.

Quote
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha. Hey everybody, Suckmyasshole claims this pic is not small.

  The size of the pic is irrlevant. Does it not show that Flex's taper is better than Ronnie's? Yes, it does. I won't re-sixe the pic just for your convinience.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24237 on: February 18, 2007, 03:00:55 PM »
Hulkster the hypocrite just posted this two pages ago lol and he's bitching about quality? owned

you do realize that pic is not meant to show detail?

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24238 on: February 18, 2007, 03:08:32 PM »
Are you saying that the lats are a factor in creating taper in the front relaxed round? What a tool you are.

yes, that is precisely what I'm saying. I don't know why this is so difficult for you to understand.

Quote
Nice try, but I said that his arms were 21" at his best, not exactly 21". Otherwise, the sentence would read like this:

  "At his best, Dorian's arms were exactly 21".

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

if only you realized how retarded you sound.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24239 on: February 18, 2007, 03:14:57 PM »
you do realize that pic is not meant to show detail?

It doesn't matter its a quality issue

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24240 on: February 18, 2007, 03:18:12 PM »
I suppose I shall post a pic of Ronnie's arms and claim Dorian's were never that hard, dry, conditioned, separated, or thick? The Ronnie fans aren't arguing that Ronnie's back was more conditioned than Dorian's, rather they are saying the difference wasn't much. Dorian's back had slightly better definition but he also sacrificed a lot of thickness. His back looks flat as a pancake next to Ronnie's. Now compare them from the front, and Ronnie destroys Dorian in dryness, conditioning, separations, striations, and taper.

Dorian's whole conditioning was outstanding period , and at times do was Ronnie's but you people keep insistining Dorian was smooth he wasn't Dorian doesn't hold water hell in a quote I posted it makes reference to Kevin being a little soft in prejudging and NOT Dorian and this is 1994 for God's sake ! Dorian bone dry & rock hard , Ronnie not always but on occasion he was .

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24241 on: February 18, 2007, 03:18:30 PM »
It doesn't matter its a quality issue

no, it's not. That pic is meant to show how large Dorian's midsection was. It's no different than when I criticized you for using a poorly scaled comparison between Dorian and Ronnie, and you claimed that it was only intended to show their balance.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24242 on: February 18, 2007, 03:23:02 PM »
Dorian's whole conditioning was outstanding period , and at times do was Ronnie's but you people keep insistining Dorian was smooth he wasn't Dorian doesn't hold water hell in a quote I posted it makes reference to Kevin being a little soft in prejudging and NOT Dorian and this is 1994 for God's sake ! Dorian bone dry & rock hard , Ronnie not always but on occasion he was.

Dorian's whole conditioning was not outstanding. Certain parts of his body were dry and shredded but not all of them. Also, you assume that hardness and smoothness are mutually exclusive. This is not true. A bowling ball is both dense and smooth.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24243 on: February 18, 2007, 03:23:27 PM »
no, it's not. That pic is meant to show how large Dorian's midsection was. It's no different than when I criticized you for using a poorly scaled comparison between Dorian and Ronnie, and you claimed that it was only intended to show their balance.

But it still applies he's bitching about the quality of pictures posted and just a couple of pages ago he's posts that and that was used as an example because that was readily available hell if I could fin with ease all the really crummy pic's of 1994 that Hulkster resized I would but the point still stands

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83648
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24244 on: February 18, 2007, 03:26:51 PM »
Dorian's whole conditioning was not outstanding. Certain parts of his body were dry and shredded but not all of them. Also, you assume that hardness and smoothness are mutually exclusive. This is not true. A bowling ball is both dense and smooth.

This is where you're just flat out wrong , Dorian's conditioning is legendary not in parts of his body but as a whole his whole physique is bone dry and ripped .


MuscleMag International Feb 1994 on Dorian Yates at the 1993 Mr Olympia


" He's huge , absolutely HUGE ...he's ripped completely RIPPED. And while he's not in possession of the prettiest physique body by a long shot , he's equipped with all the bodyparts you need to win .

Combine this with the fact that he's 10 TIMES more impressive when you see him onstage at the Olympia than he is in pictures or on videos and you got yourself a winner.

What the fuck do you think this means? he was completely ripped in his back? you're ice-skating up-hill on this one kid

he's ripped completely RIPPED.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24245 on: February 18, 2007, 03:57:39 PM »
Quote
he's ripped completely RIPPED.

how can you actually agree with this crap?

honestly?

can you not see properly?: ???
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24246 on: February 18, 2007, 03:59:24 PM »
Its so easy to make you look foolish remember the resized Dorian pics you made? lol remeber how blurry they were? you're a hypocrite through and through

the only one was that 94 shot showing his monster gut.

and it was only blurry because it was a blurry scan to begin with.

all I did was enlarge it by 150% with MS picture manager.

 :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24247 on: February 18, 2007, 04:00:33 PM »
ND, if this is your idea of being "completely ripped" then you have a lot to learn:

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24248 on: February 18, 2007, 04:01:38 PM »
Quote
Combine this with the fact that he's 10 TIMES more impressive when you see him onstage at the Olympia than he is in pictures or on videos and you got yourself a winner.


Ronnie would be 10x more impressive in person too so exactly what is your point?

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #24249 on: February 18, 2007, 04:04:40 PM »
Quote
Dorian's whole conditioning was not outstanding. Certain parts of his body were dry and shredded but not all of them.

you got that right.

like every damn muscle on his entire front side except for his abs:

Flower Boy Ran Away