Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3525402 times)

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #24425 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:22:04 PM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 19, 2007, 04:27:31 PM

Thank you for proving that Yates was more detailed and better proportioned than Coleman has ever been.

P.S. Your comparison also proves how fat Coleman's ass is.

Pwn3d. LOL

You call that more detailed and proportion?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24426 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:22:44 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2007, 07:19:51 PM

Monster self ownage lol he posts the worse comparison in the history of comparisons and claims Ronnie has a better back , despite being down on hardness , dryness and deatil , great post and Ronnie already conceded Dorian has the thickest freakiest back he ever seen , case closed.

hey dumbass, I wasn't trying to prove that Ronnie has a better back in those comparisons. I was merely showing the discrepancy in size between them. 03 Ronnie dwarfed 93 Dorian from the back. Talk about poor reading comprehension skills.

the choad · « **Reply #24427 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:23:44 PM »

only thing that is clear cut in this debate thus far is that Dorian's calves kill Ronnie's..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24428 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:24:01 PM »

2003 is not the high water mark for Ronnie's best back

pobrecito · « **Reply #24429 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:24:13 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 19, 2007, 07:22:44 PM

hey dumbass, I wasn't trying to prove that Ronnie has a better back in those comparisons. I was merely showing the discrepancy in size between them. 03 Ronnie dwarfed 93 Dorian from the back. Talk about poor reading comprehension skills.

size due to water-logged mass is a joke.

Even at his all-time worse, A 94 Yates still has a better back than any version of Ronnie.

pobrecito · « **Reply #24430 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:25:04 PM »

This is a fucking joke.

2003 was overrated.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #24431 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:25:19 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2007, 04:51:31 PM

I mean this is just an outstanding back double biceps complete from head to toe , lacks nothing.

So where are the biceps and triceps?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24432 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:25:29 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2007, 07:21:22 PM

hey no need to countdown to the excuses lol and Neo didn't you get the memo? the case is closed , Ronnie closed it

too bad it means shit. Peter McGough already said that Ronnie has the greatest back of all-time. No offense to Ronnie, but I - along with many others I presume - would take Peter's word over him.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24433 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:26:33 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 19, 2007, 07:22:44 PM

hey dumbass, I wasn't trying to prove that Ronnie has a better back in those comparisons. I was merely showing the discrepancy in size between them. 03 Ronnie dwarfed 93 Dorian from the back. Talk about poor reading comprehension skills.

Moron you put two different pics side by side and you have the balls to think that accurately shows how they would look side-by-side? Ronnie 2003 wouldn't dwarf Dorian by a long shot , only in your slanted comparisons kid

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #24434 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:28:19 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 19, 2007, 07:25:29 PM

too bad it means shit. Peter McGough already said that Ronnie has the greatest back of all-time. No offense to Ronnie, but I - along with many others I presume - would take Peter's word over him.

lmfao what a loser , Samir , Ronnie and Rhul and team Flex all voted Dorian best back ever and that was 1999 and that included Peter McGough among others and Ronnie's back hasn't gotten better since 1999 only worse , so have a nice day

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #24435 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:30:17 PM »

Quote from: usmokepole on February 19, 2007, 06:53:24 PM

and to sucky, i dont know anythign about your argument involving centimeters or rounding errors, you said dorians arms are 21(a number that means nothing, since this is a visual sport). then used a lame excuse about you would have said exactly.

thats all i was saying. i never read you and NEOs argument save the taper argument in which your wrong.

I'm starting to get pissed off, and trust me that's not a good thing. I have already stated that I did say that Dorian's arms at his biggest were 21", so why the fuck are you sayig that I'm backpeddlig? The thing is that I saw at a magazine that Dorian's arms tapered at 53 centimeters, and that this is roughly 21". It's probably more like 20.8", but only a nerd would care about precision like this. You are not a dumb guy, and I'm sadly disappointed that you can't uderstand that there is such a thing as approximation.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24436 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:30:52 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2007, 07:26:33 PM

Moron you put two different pics side by side and you have the balls to think that accurately shows how they would look side-by-side? Ronnie 2003 wouldn't dwarf Dorian by a long shot , only in your slanted comparisons kid

yawn, I have challenged you many times to come up with a more accurate version of my comparison using the same pics I did.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24437 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:31:51 PM »

93 Dorian would get dwarfed standing next to this.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #24438 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:32:40 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on February 19, 2007, 06:59:02 PM

No kidding! This "student of physiology" has serious problems!! LOL

Do NOT delete-he might attack someone in real life if it's removed.

This coming from the Bowflex queen, who got beaten and humiliated by me so may times that she left the thread or months.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Big Lee · « **Reply #24439 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:33:22 PM »

This isnt really a truce, is it?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24440 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:38:30 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2007, 07:28:19 PM

lmfao what a loser , Samir , Ronnie and Rhul and team Flex all voted Dorian best back ever and that was 1999 and that included Peter McGough among others and Ronnie's back hasn't gotten better since 1999 only worse , so have a nice day

Ronnie's back was better at the 01 ASC, and you know it. Peter McGough even commented about how dry and shredded he looked. So it's deceitful to use a 99 issue of Flex magazine to support your argument. It would be like using a quote from 91 to argue why Lee Haney's back is better than Dorian's.

pobrecito · « **Reply #24441 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:39:35 PM »

Ronnie owned yet again hahahahah

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #24442 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:40:23 PM »

And by the way, Usmoke, taper in the front relaxed round is a fuction of shoulder-to-waist ratio, not lat-to-waist ratio. That lats are barely visible in this shot, so saying that taper here is created by the lats is retarded. Sorry. As or V-taper, imagine a line oig dow rom the delts to the waist. What shape would it create? That's right: a V.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #24443 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:43:36 PM »

Quote from: usmokepole on February 19, 2007, 06:59:25 PM

why do you guys keep using less the stellar ronnie to compare pics with?

ND you dont understand what thickness is obviously

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24444 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:45:22 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on February 19, 2007, 07:39:35 PM

Ronnie owned yet again hahahahah

maybe if this were a contest to see who has the smallest arms, but I don't see how Dorian is owning Ronnie here.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #24445 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:48:29 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 19, 2007, 07:02:48 PM

LMFAO owned by Ronnie 2003

DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.

LOL, here come the quotes. Get real man.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #24446 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:51:27 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on February 19, 2007, 07:40:23 PM

And by the way, Usmoke, taper in the front relaxed round is a fuction of shoulder-to-waist ratio, not lat-to-waist ratio. That lats are barely visible in this shot, so saying that taper here is created by the lats is retarded. Sorry. As or V-taper, imagine a line oig dow rom the delts to the waist. What shape would it create? That's right: a V.

they say a pic is worth a thousand words...

pobrecito · « **Reply #24447 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:52:43 PM »

I'm sorry, but Ronnie is just fucking owned here again.

It's called the front lat spread.

Ronnie's lats are invisible compared to Diesel's.

Everything just flows better on Yates pose.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #24448 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:53:17 PM »

Sperm gets owned with his own poorly scaled, out of angle, biased comparisos. I love it! The ability that this f.a.g.g.o.t has of being anally pounded and yet coming back or more is astoundig. This bareback queen has absolutely no content and intelligence, and her posts are composed of nothing more than nit-picking irrelevant thing, like whether 21" equals 52 or 54 cetimeters, posting biased comparisons and posting quotes of mine from months ago completely out of context.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #24449 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:54:35 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 19, 2007, 07:51:27 PM

they say a pic is worth a thousand words...

I agree with you...

SUCKMYMUSCLE