damn boy, do I have to keep correcting you every time you respond to me? I said Ronnie's back was better at the 01 ASC than in 99. This nullifies your 99 Team Flex reference since they had no way of teleporting to the future. In regards to your post, I feel that Ronnie's back at the 01 ASC was just as good as Dorian's. Ronnie had more thickness and better taper while Dorian had slightly more detail. It comes down to personal preference. I'm being generous here since many feel that Ronnie's back was better, including Peter McGough.
Ronnie did NOT have more thickness in 01 thats a dream he was down 13 pounds and you're fond of saying Dorian has most of his weight in his torso

Ronnie's back 01 is among his smallest showings albeit harder more detailed , Dorian is clearly thicker in his lats , traps and lower back this i.e his whole back period
2003 Ronnie Coleman i.e. post 2001 ASC mind you
DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and
the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.Samir Bannout 2002 mind you this was after the 2001 ASC
Jay Cutler blows the other bodybuilders away with the crisp detail of his muscularity from top to bottom. He has superior calves, hamstrings and glutes. His back is detailed and big, but it does not match up well against Ronnie,
who has the second-best back in the history of bodybuilding behind the great Dorian Yates
Two Mr Olympia confirm what I said , what is blatantly obvious Dorian's back is thicker and better , better than 01 ASC better than 1999 Mr Olympia , better than 1998 Mr Olympia , better than any freakin year , you can't counter this