Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

how is my response stupid? You post all these quotes from people praising Dorian's conditioning and balance to support your argument. When someone disagrees with you, all you do is repost the same old quotes and tell them they're wrong. Then when Hulkster or I post quotes from people who say that Ronnie is better (which is more relevant to this discussion), you keep insisting that Dorian has better conditioning and balance. What the f*ck does that have to do with who would win? A cheetah runs faster than a horse but that doesn't mean it would win a marathon. If anything, you are the one who is being stupid for expecting us to accept your quotes while you ignore the quotes that favor our position.

It's insanely stupid Neo for the reasons I explained , conditioning and balance are part of the official IFBB judging criteria if one person can satisfy that criteria more than the other he's deemed the superior bodybuilder

you have every stating Ronnie 2003 is unbeatable and such yet he's the furthest away from the criteria he's ever been in his career , his balance at its all time worse , his hardness & dryness has been much better , his density is lacking he may have had an easy time with a flat Jay Cutler and a 225 pound Dexter Jackson , Dorian Yates is a whole other story , the criteria favors Dorian

[NarcissisticDeity]

again with the quotes bullshit. Hey ND, the same guy also said that Ronnie is unbeatable.

You cry bullshit with the quotes and then use one lol you're torn lol

[Hulkster]

lol check out the size of Ronnie's legs at his 'small' size of only 247 pounds at the AC:


something tells me that even though dorian might have been 10 pounds heavier, his arms and legs would have been smaller than Ronnie's, but his waist was certainly much bigger...

[NarcissisticDeity]

lol check out the size of Ronnie's legs at his 'small' size of only 247 pounds at the AC:


something tells me that even though dorian might have been 10 pounds heavier, his arms and legs would have been smaller than Ronnie's, but his waist was certainly much bigger...

You should really contemplate what you type lol

[Iceman1981]

Dorian "Loose Skin" Yates

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie's quads were relatively small in 2001 they're smaller than Titus and James

[NeoSeminole]

It's insanely stupid Neo for the reasons I explained , conditioning and balance are part of the official IFBB judging criteria if one person can satisfy that criteria more than the other he's deemed the superior bodybuilder

you have every stating Ronnie 2003 is unbeatable and such yet he's the furthest away from the criteria he's ever been in his career , his balance at its all time worse , his hardness & dryness has been much better , his density is lacking he may have had an easy time with a flat Jay Cutler and a 225 pound Dexter Jackson , Dorian Yates is a whole other story , the criteria favors Dorian

It depends on which version of Dorian we're talking about. If you want to compare 93 Dorian, then he gets crushed by Ronnie in muscular bulk and definition but wins in symmetry. If you want to compare 95 Dorian, then he loses in size, definition, and symmetry. Either way, 03 Ronnie stills beats Dorian overall.

[pobrecito]

Titus is owning Coleman there

[Hulkster]

You should really contemplate what you type lol

so should you.

what does the gut have anything do with what I posted?

[NarcissisticDeity]

It depends on which version of Dorian we're talking about. If you want to compare 93 Dorian, then he gets crushed by Ronnie in muscular bulk and definition but wins in symmetry. If you want to compare 95 Dorian, then he loses in size, definition, and symmetry. Either way, 03 Ronnie stills beats Dorian overall.

if you're talking about Ronnie 2003 the ONLY advantage he has on Dorian is muscular bulk , Dorian hands down better balance & proportion even in 1995 , better hardness & dryness , better density couple in posing and presentation , Dorian has to many strengths

[NarcissisticDeity]

so should you.

what does the gut have anything do with what I posted?

owned 

[NeoSeminole]

Dorian "Loose Skin" Yates

more pics of the loose skin on his lower back from 95 alone.

[NarcissisticDeity]

more pics of his loose skin from 95 alone.

Flex magazine Dec 1995

Dorian Yates : Skin like tissue paper. In the crucial front double-biceps shot , the left bicep is short , but NOT fatally so. Traps look as if they have the capacity to render him deaf. Back , upper and lower , is sensational in EVERY respect : width , thickness and detail. Side triceps is a masterpiece that he's made into a Broadway production number. Thighs have more sweep than before . Calves? Yates wrote the book on calves . In muscle thickness , he's in a class of his own . Today's combination of size , proportion , shape and condition make this his peak form.

Not one mention of Dorian holding any water or fat , or being less conditioned than previous years , there is here though , if there was an issue McGough would have called it , there is NO issue its nonsense

[Hulkster]

dorian's back shows loose skin...ronnie's back shows ripped striations...

ronnie easily over yates

[pobrecito]

more pics of the loose skin on his lower back from 95 alone.

Are those supposed to help or hurt your argument???

Those shots are un-fucking believable.

[NeoSeminole]

if you're talking about Ronnie 2003 the ONLY advantage he has on Dorian is muscular bulk , Dorian hands down better balance & proportion even in 1995 , better hardness & dryness , better density couple in posing and presentation , Dorian has to many strengths

bwahahahahahaha, I like how you forget the IFBB judging criteria when it suits you. It specifically mentions muscular definition, which 03 Ronnie clearly wins. 93 Dorian has better symmetry but not in 95. It's bad enough that he has twig arms, but gis biceps tear was brutally obvious and threw his whole balance off.

[NarcissisticDeity]

dorian's back shows loose skin...ronnie's back shows ripped striations...

ronnie easily over yates

Damn lol major-self ownage lol you post pics of Ronnie clearly holding water and claim he's drier than Dorian , man you're having a bad night lol

[Hulkster]

Flex magazine Dec 1995

Dorian Yates : Skin like tissue paper. In the crucial front double-biceps shot , the left bicep is short , but NOT fatally so. Traps look as if they have the capacity to render him deaf. Back , upper and lower , is sensational in EVERY respect : width , thickness and detail. Side triceps is a masterpiece that he's made into a Broadway production number. Thighs have more sweep than before . Calves? Yates wrote the book on calves . In muscle thickness , he's in a class of his own . Today's combination of size , proportion , shape and condition make this his peak form.

Not one mention of Dorian holding any water or fat , or being less conditioned than previous years , there is here though , if there was an issue McGough would have called it , there is NO issue its nonsense

lol 

 

question for ND:

If a university math professor went on tv right now and said that 2+2 is actually 5, would you forever believe him even though everything tells and shows you that the answer is 4?

because that is what you do.

you are shown tons and tons of proof and you sweep them all under the carpet with an irrelevant quote...

[Hulkster]

Damn lol major-self ownage lol you post pics of Ronnie clearly holding water and claim he's drier than Dorian , man you're having a bad night lol

did I ever claim that 2001 grand prix ronnie is harder than dorian?

hell no.

we are talking about the ARNOLD CLASSIC Ronnie, not the ronnie that showed up after the olympia..

[NeoSeminole]

Are those supposed to help or hurt your argument???

Those shots are un-fucking believable.

yawn, they were only meant to show Dorian's loose skin. There's a big difference between black-and-white and color shots.

[NarcissisticDeity]

bwahahahahahaha, I like how you forget the IFBB judging criteria when it suits you. It specifically mentions muscular definition, which 03 Ronnie clearly wins. 93 Dorian has better symmetry but not in 95. It's bad enough that he has twig arms, but gis biceps tear was brutally obvious and threw his whole balance off.

You still have much to learn , 03 is better conditioned than Yates 1993/1995? damn thats dumb and symmetry , see balance and proportion which Yates ( again ) has a clear advantage and we're back to the twig arms now? make up your mind lol

FYI

definition - conditioning , dryness , hardness , ripped
symmetry - balance & proportion

study hard there will be a quiz in the future 

[pobrecito]

Ronnie owned again LOL.

[NarcissisticDeity]

did I ever claim that 2001 grand prix ronnie is harder than dorian?

hell no.

we are talking about the ARNOLD CLASSIC Ronnie, not the ronnie that showed up after the olympia..

You posted a picture of Ronnie clearly holding water as an example of what Dorian should look like lol insanely dumb post on par with Neo's conditioning & balance post

[pobrecito]

Seriously, Ronnie's arms look fucking retarded here....his triceps are literally twice the size of his synthol'd calves

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie owned again LOL.

BY FAR !