Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pobrecito]

Nope, Ronnie's look like shit




Ray was robbed in 98.

I can't believe Ronnie won with a nipple the size of Anna Nicole's

Regardless, Ronnie was owned by damn near everyone in the top6 from the front in 98

[Hulkster]

Nope, Ronnie's look like shit




Ray was robbed in 98.

I can't believe Ronnie won with a nipple the size of Anna Nicole's

Regardless, Ronnie was owned by damn near everyone in the top6 from the front in 98

one of the most ironic posts ever in the history of the world, when you consider this:

in other words:


Ray was Robbed in 94..

I can't believe Dorian won with a missing biceps muscle.

Regardless, Dorian was owned by damn near everyone in the top 6 from the front in 1994


 

[pobrecito]

one of the most ironic posts ever in the history of the world, when you consider this:

in other words:


Ray was Robbed in 94..

I can't believe Dorian won with a missing biceps muscle.

Regardless, Dorian was owned by damn near everyone in the top 6 from the front in 1994


 

Except, the difference is, Dorian was 262lbs and his nearest rival was 205

[Hulkster]

Except, the difference is, Dorian was 262lbs and his nearest rival was 205

yes, but as the musclemag review stated quite emphatically, the extra weight dorian carried in 94 was not the prime mass he had hoped for...

and you can tell quite easily:

standing next to the guy who placed....13th...

[pobrecito]

Please explain to me how Ray can beat Yates in muscularity.

[Necrosis]

Please explain to me how Ray can beat Yates in muscularity.

yates doesnt look that big there buddy. his lats are massive. his arms and delts look small. and his quads suck, no sweep, no seperation, just a blob.

[Iceman1981]

In case you forgot your own quote 

You said any year I provided any year

My bad. Next time I'll say "contest". But that shows that you still cling to gym shots rather than contest shots.

[Iceman1981]

Its NOT loose skin its not fat and its not water , learn this

You have to learn. Explain it to us then?

[Iceman1981]

Too easy. I can't believe people are actually arguing that yates beats Coleman in this pose. Just look at it. Coleman has him on the detail, lower back is way tighter, glutes are ripped, hams are ripped, arms are better, back looks thicker. Only thing yates wins in this pose are the calves. yates loose skin that is hanging ruins the whole pose.

[pobrecito]

Yates' back is miles denser and thicker there.

[NeoSeminole]

Yates' back is miles denser and thicker there.

out of the shots you posted, only 2 are a mandatory pose. Ronnie still crushes Dorian.

[pobrecito]

out of the shots you posted, only 2 are a mandatory pose. Ronnie still crushes Dorian.

NeoSemen,

I have already concluded that a 2003 Ronnie would defeat Yates due to the muscularity discrepancy - go back and search if you wish.

However, this thread is about both at their peaks (based on condition), 93/95 for Yates and 98/99/01AC for Coleman.

It is when you take that criteria that Yates wins in my opinion based on his super density (and therefore muscularity) and condition.

[NeoSeminole]

NeoSemen,

I have already concluded that a 2003 Ronnie would defeat Yates due to the muscularity discrepancy - go back and search if you wish.

However, this thread is about both at their peaks (based on condition), 93/95 for Yates and 98/99/01AC for Coleman.

It is when you take that criteria that Yates wins in my opinion based on his super density (and therefore muscularity) and condition.

this discussion is about who would win if Ronnie and Dorian competed against each other at their respective peaks. Nowhere was it specified that only their best conditioning is used. Furthermore, it makes no sense that a less than prime (according to you) Ronnie would beat Dorian yet lose if we compared both at their peaks.

[pobrecito]

this discussion is about who would win if Ronnie and Dorian competed against each other at their respective peaks. Nowhere was it specified that only their best conditioning is used. Furthermore, it makes no sense that a less than prime (according to you) Ronnie would beat Dorian yet lose if we compared both at their peaks.

The general consensus is that Ronnie's peak when you factor in condition and muscularity is 98,99, and 01AC. As well, the only reason an 03 Ronnie beats Yates is muscularity discrepancy, and that is it. He does not have this same luxury at his peak form. In fact, it is Yates who holds that advantage.

[IceCold]

ronnie wrote the book on delts

sure he did.

because when you think of delts you think of paul dillet, nasser, ruhl, levrone, and oh yea, ronnie coleman.

please. 

[IceCold]

You have to learn. Explain it to us then?

i think yates lower back in that pose has more to do with him not flexing it.

here is evidence to support my claim.







yates has the best xmas tree of all time.

[delta9mda]

be glad yates retired cuz he'd have 7 or 8 mr o's.  here is off season yates pre-tear.

[IceCold]

more ronnie coleman ownage courtesy of joel 'no body' stubbs.





but no yates ownage:

[Iceman1981]

i think yates lower back in that pose has more to do with him not flexing it.

here is evidence to support my claim.







yates has the best xmas tree of all time.

Where have you been the past week? Go back about 5-10 pages and see what we are talking about. We are not talking about xmas tree. We are talking about yates loose skin hanging off of his lower back in the rear latspread. Isn't it kind of funny you post 2 shots that are not a rear latspread or a mandatory pose? That's not evidence.

[Iceman1981]

be glad yates retired cuz he'd have 7 or 8 mr o's.  here is off season yates pre-tear.

I don't think so. He would of got killed in 98 looking like this:

[IceCold]

I don't think so. He would of got killed in 98 looking like this:

ronnie didnt think so.

do i have to post the quote from the november 99 issue of flex. 

[IceCold]

Where have you been the past week? Go back about 5-10 pages and see what we are talking about. We are not talking about xmas tree. We are talking about yates loose skin hanging off of his lower back in the rear latspread. Isn't it kind of funny you post 2 shots that are not a rear latspread or a mandatory pose? That's not evidence.

my point was that i dont think yates flexes his low back in the lat spread.

his xmas tree is clearyly visibile, if not the most visible of all time, in the bdb and other poses. 

[Necrosis]

more ronnie coleman ownage courtesy of joel 'no body' stubbs.





but no yates ownage:

hahahah, way to post a morphed pic to prove your point. yates is getting crushed if you posted the real fuggin pic. ronnie is not.

ronnie has the thickest back of all time.

[IceCold]

i know the pic is morphed.

stubbs is crushing ronnie in any back pic you can post.

yates wrote the book on back thickenss.

even ronnie admitted to it.

are you a more valid source as to who has the thickest back than ronnie coleman?

didnt think so.

[pumpster]

i know the pic is morphed.

stubbs is crushing ronnie in any back pic you can post.

yates wrote the book on back thickenss.

even ronnie admitted to it.

are you a more valid source as to who has the thickest back than ronnie coleman?

didnt think so.

More useless posts LOL