But Dorian's conditioning is the best ever! Sorry, sport, but your boy never became famous for his conditioning. That is just plainly a fact. Conversely, Dorian's 1993/5/6 Olympia winning forms are ranked as the best ever by several bodybuilding writers and judges.
that's your personal opinion. Unless you have a hydrostatic weighing machine and individually measured Dorian and Ronnie at their peaks, you cannot definitively say who was more conditioned. I personally feel that 01 ASC Ronnie's conditioning slightly exceeded Dorian's. Ronnie's back looked tight and hard like Dorian's in addition to having better definition in his delts, pecs, arms, glutes, quads and hamstrings.
Oh, I most certainly mentioned grain before. Several times. In fact, I gave a lenghy explanation to Usmoke regarding how it's unfair to say that Ronnie has better conditioning than Dorian in virtue of him having more overral separations, because Dorian has more grain.
I said you never mentioned grain in any of your responses to me. I don't care if you said it in one of your replies to someone else. I don't read all of your posts in this thread.
So are you saying that a fat guy holding water would look grainy if he had lots of acne in his skin? You just broke the bank in stupidity for this one.
obviously not, dumbass, since the acne wouldn't be enough to compensate for his abundant fat and water. However, compare Ronnie and Dorian when they are both in contest-condition. Now switch Ronnie's smooth, even-tone skin with Dorian's acne-covered, leathery skin. I guarantee you that Ronnie would look "grainier" than Dorian.
Ready to get owned? Well, sport, separations are most definitely genetic to some extent, because there is such a thibg as overral bodyfat and separations. Assume two guys, both at 3% bodyfat. Now, the bodyfat refers to overral fat, right? So, if separations are not partially genetic, then they would show the exact same number of separations overral for the same amount of bodyfat. Sure, one guy would have more separations here and the other there, but overral their number of separations would be the exact fucking thing for the same given amount of bodyfat. Since it's not, your theory is downright wrong and you got owned yet again.
if they had the same amount of muscle, then I believe they would demonstrate the same amount of overall definition. If separations and striations were largely genetic, as you say, then how come you don't see defined people with 15% body fat. Instead, they may have visible striations in their delts or good separation in their quads and that's it. This simply means they naturally store less fat and water in certain areas.
Not feeling so confident now, huh, dipshit? You posted your pics a few months ago and challenged me to a posedown; now that I'm returning the favor by challenging you at a competition that actually means something, and you weasel out with the bullshit excuse that you'll thinbk about it and that it's not in your priority list. What's in your priority list, dipshit? Licking the spooge out of Coleman's crotch?
ha ha ha ha ha, you're such a pathetic tool. My hesitation to enter the Mr. Getbig has nothing to do with lack of confidence. In that case, I challenge you to enter a marathon or climb a mountain. Competing in an online bodybuilding competition isn't exactly high on my agenda of things to do. Furthermore, I never challenged you to a posedown. I don't know where you got that shit from. I dared you to post a pic of yourself. Of course, you chickened out like the loser that you are.
