I didn't make anything up. You claim that Dorian has a "grainy" appearance. I don't see how b/c he looks like he was rolled from a batch of dough. I'm postulating possible reasons why you might be confused and think he looks grainy.
The really funny thing is that I have already proved to you through several examples why you're wrong, and yet you continue to insist with this shit. Dorian was at his grainiest at the 1995 Olympia, and he had no acne in his body. There are tons of bodybuilders who have competed with more acne in their bodies than Dorian, and none of them were ever refered to as "grainy". Besides, Dorian was grainy in his entire body, which means that it couldn't be caused by acne because the distribution of acne is not symmetrical.
There are so many reasons why you're wrong, and yet you remain adamant that it is the result of acne. You even made a retarded assertion that acne somehow makes one grainier when there is less fat and water, when I have already demonstrated to you, through example, that this is impossible. Try to understand this: Dorian's grain is the result of his extremely low fat and water levels, plus genetics.
Some bodybuilders would show more separations at that bodyfat and water levels, while Doria shows his superb coditioning more through a hange in skin texture. This is obvious. Dorian didn't have as much separatios as a Wheeler even when he was in better conditioning. Why? Because his conditioning was expressed as a change in skin texture rather than just separations. Learn your lesson.

SUCKMYMUSCLE