listen to yourself, you idiot. You claim that I purposely ignore certain parts of your posts yet you mention in the same sentence that I replied to them. Make up your mind.
You remain very quiet when I own you, sport. I have even gotten a confession from you that I'm right about something and you were wrong. When did I say that you were right about somethig you wrote? That's right: never.
I make you shut up, and the only reason why you keep responding is to save face and not have to admit that you're wrong. Then you demand me to respond to your posts that I have already responded before, and when I ignore you claim that I remained silent because you somehow owned me.
Some of the things I proved you wrong conlusively:
-
Separations are partially genetic. -
Ronnie carried more mass at the 1999 Olympia than he did at the 2001 ASC. -
The 1995 Dorian Yates carried more mass than the 2001 ASC Ronnie. -
McGough's opinion about Ronnie's 2001 ASC coditioning is nullified by the fact that he said in 2006 that no bodybuilder has ever been as hard and dry as Dorian. -
Separations is only one of the things that indicate conditioning, and the most separated bodybuilder is not necessarily the most conditioned.not really. My argument is assuming there is such a thing as looking "grainy." I don't believe there is. Where exactly do you see this "grain" on Dorian? His arms, delts, pecs, quads and glutes all look smooth to me. This is the opposite of what you claim - he's covered everywhere in bumps. I'm just entertaining your nonsense. If you make such retarded statements, then don't be surprised if you get a retarded response.
Dorian looks grainy because his skin looks dry and, and it has nothing to do with acne. I have already explained that when some bodybuilders show more separations when they drop fat and water, while others show their extremely low fat and water by a chage in skin texture. This is obvious to the eyes. Dorian was never the king of separations, even when he was supremely conditioned, and yet no one would deny that he shows an incredibly hard appearance. Dorian never required acne to look grainy: at the 1995 Olympia he was acne-free, and he he was at his grainiest.
And the really sad thing is that you owned yourself when you claimed that ace produces more grain when the individual is low in fat and water. You obviously implied that grain is at least partially the result of low fat and water. When I challeged you to explain why acne by itself cannot make one look hard like Yates, you were dumbfounded by it and couldn't explain it. Losing either fat or water, by itself, will make you look more like a contest-ready Dorian, but having acne won't.
bullshit, Branch Warren has the same "look" as Dorian. How do you determine grainyness then?
Because you say so? First of all, Warren is supremely conditioned, thus you're implying that Dorian's contest-ready physique was the result of low fat and water levels. Secodly, Warren looks nothing like Dorian - except for the fact that, together with Badell, he is currently the most well-conditioned bodybuilder out there.
completely irrelevant. If I challenged you to a 100 meter race and then you challenged me to a marathon, then I'm not the one trying to weasel my way out of the situation. I had no intentions of entering an online bodybuilding competition to begin with. I'm simply asking you to throw up a pic of yourself from your prime to compare with me at 21 yrs old. It only takes you a few seconds to look for a pic. Conversely, it would take me several months to get in shape for a bodybuilding contest.
Bullshit. You are afraid of me, and you should as well be.
What's the point of posting a pic that won't be judged? I responded to your challenge by calling you out to post pics at a contest where they will actually be judged. Claiming unfairness is non-sensical, because you'd have the same time to prepare that I would. Ordinarily, you would be entitled to decline my challenge without losing face, but not in this case, because the first challenge came from you.
I know what the problem is: you are a nerd living your life on the internet. I obviously hurt your feelings when I pointed out that you spend all Saturdays logged in to Getbig. I know exactly how to manipulate you; you are a puppet on a string to me.
It's not my fault that you're shy and socially inept. This is why you're rejected by the normal Society of people, and log in every weekend to try and make friends here. I make you meltdown all the time, to the point where you report me to moderators, quote posts from others at different threads where I'm posting - which have nothing to do with this topic - and write "owned", even when I'm not even arguing with the poster in question, and stalk me around other threads demanding that I reply to you. It's quite sad, really, and you obviously give more importance to my posts than I do to yours.
Here is a pic of Dorian at his grainiest. And guess what? No acne!
This is what I mean by "grain": a change in skin texture that some bodybuilders display when they're low in fat and water, which is completely uncorrelated with acne. Remove the acne from the 1993 Dorian - the only year when he had acne, and he still looks grainy; cover the 1999 or 2001 ASC Ronnie with acne, and he still doesen't look grainy. By the way, Coleman is clearly off, and yet his delt tie-ins are still as separated as Dorian's, thus indicating that separations are partially genetic, and that the most conditioned bodybuilder is not necessarily the most separated.
Owned 
.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
