excuses, excuses.
arent those the same judges that also judged ronnie?
yes, and they had ronnie lose twice while mr. Olympia, as he should have.
they never did with dorian, even when he should have in his horrible looking post tear years.
why?
because fans were sick and tired of the crappy "mr. O can show up 500 pounds fat and untanned and still win" bullshit that had plaged the sport since 1980.
It just so happened that Ronnie was the guy in the top spot at the time.
No doubt if they were reversed and Ronnie was Mr. O. from 92-97, he too would have never lost and it would have been dorian that lost in 2002 and 2006.
the judging was much more fair in the 2000's
why can you not see that?:
everyone else seems to be able to.
ronnie lost in 2006 and rightfully so.
dorian should have lost in 94 and 97. but didn't.