lame, I type one paragraph and you respond with 4. This is why I heavily edit your posts. Nobody wants to read an essay. If I quote your whole post and respond to each comment, then I'm up to 8 paragraphs total between you and me. Then you'll just reply with whatever bullshit to each of my paragraphs. Now we're up to 16. You get the idea why I ask you to keep your responses short.
The funny thing is that if I did keep my responses short, you'd accuse me of not explaining anything.
utter bullshit! I gave such a well thought out argument that you never responded to it. Here it is again for you to see. You're the one who has given absolutely no explanations for your position. All you do is say "nah uh, you're wrong" like some little kid.
You lying little shit. >:(I explained to you why you're wrong several times.
"Your contention is wrong. I have supported my argument with sound knowledge of anatomy and physiology. All you have done is disagree with me. You have offered no shred of evidence to support your theory whatsoever. What variables do you propose are responsible for this lack of "equation" among bodybuilders? Muscle fascia? Hah, it's just a millimeter thick - hardly enough to appreciably obscure muscle definition. The skin? It's only a few millimeters in thickness and becomes even thinner when a person is conditioned. Again, this is not enough to cause one person to look smooth at 4% body fat while another looks very defined."
Sperm, pay attention. Why do I need to provide evidence for this? Evidence of what kind? All I had to do was to point out that your theory is wrong because two bodybuilders with the exact same amount of bodyfat have a different amount of separations.
I don't need to know the exact factor responsible for this because the observation proves your theory wrong. If both bodybuilders have the same amount of bodyfat and one is more separated than the other, then there are other factors at play besides bodyfat distribution. Duh! You moron!
SUCKMYMUSCLE
