Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pobrecito]

Nice job posting the two worst pictures of him ever. And the  bdb is from his comeback this year. Wow you really outdid yourself now retard. Go back to your fucking hole.

Even at his peak, he didn't look any better hahahahahaha .....could you imagine being a 270lb monster and not able to beat a 160lb lee labrada LOL

[pobrecito]

BOOOOOM!!!

[pobrecito]

Dillet was so mentally weak that he simply gave up after he saw these pictures...

[realkarateblackbelt]

Ugh. These retards are coming in and ruining this thread with pics of the swimmer Dillet.
He looks narrow and lanky; he's got no back. Zzzz.

[RocketSwitch625]

And to think that some people on this board accuse Yates of having an ugly physique.

To all the nuthuggers out there, this is what an ugly physique looks like:

[realkarateblackbelt]

He looks like the late Chris Cormier, but even smoother, and with less muscle. Absolute shit.

[Hulkster]

you still havent provided why anyone would be biased or impartial to yates.

you need something called evidence. 

merely stating bullshit claims isnt enough.

and posting a few pics of dorian loosing various poses isnt enough.

no bodbybuilder will look amazing in every pose.

besides, what you interpret the pictures as is something entirely different to what myself, the judges, and reality say.

you really don't know what to say do you?

first of all, posting a  few pics of dorian loosing poses IS enough in this sport - this is bodybuilding competition, its not essay writing or mathematics.

the evidence needed is found ONSTAGE, and when you get PERFECT SCORE AFTER PERFECT SCORE despite LOOSING ALL THESE POSES the evidence becomes VERY CREDIBLE..

Secondly, no one knows WHY Joe Weider favored yates. Why has nothing to do with it - he obviously had reasons.

the point is that ONSTAGE PROOF shows that POST TEAR Yates WAS favored, hell, so was pre-tear yates with the most partial judging seen onstage in a long long time in 93 (muscularity round fiasco).

deal with it.

You make the stupid claim that yourself and the judges and 'reality' interpret the pics differently than we do..

well guess what?

so did many people during dorian's post tear reign - anyone who followed dorian's wins in 94, 96 and 97 will tell you that..

[Hulkster]

Hulkster,

do you truly believe Ronnie deserved to win the 2001 Mr. Olympia considering that he lost the entire pre-judging?

hard to say.

it happened to Yates as well in the 94 grand prix run. He was loosing to Kevin Levrone heading into the night show and came back during the posing round and posedown.

Ronnie tightened up.

Apparently, so did Dorian.

[Hulkster]

LOL check out this review of dorian's 1996 grand prix win from bodybuilding.com (matt - you really summed up our arguments with this one!

Dorian Yates (UK)

His arms looked tiny at te opening of his routine. Now this may have been only in comparison to his immense upper body, but I DOUBT THAT. They looked far smaller than arms of the other guys in the show - and how do you even win a show to begin with having only ONE arm at that? He was blocky and his chest looked flat. From the back he owned everyone in the show by a country mile so I guess it's possible to declare him the winner if you put a lot of emphasis on his strenghts - back and calves. But everything like that was so far behind some of the competition it wasn't even funny. Some of his Mr. Olympia wins during this era were a joke. I'm pretty sure every other Mr. Olympia had at least ONE clear cut victory. Did Dorian have any where he won by a country mile though? For example, had Ronnie not won in 1998 or 2003 it would have been absurd. Some of his victories were controversial, but not those ones. Did Dorian ever clearly win by a longshot? I'm not sure.

funny how many different people can independantly all see the same thing..its all the proof of politics or bias or whatever you want to call it, that you need...

[pobrecito]

LOL check out this review of dorian's 1996 grand prix win from bodybuilding.com (matt - you really summed up our arguments with this one!

funny how many different people can independantly all see the same thing..its all the proof of politics or bias or whatever you want to call it, that you need...

Matt has been a biased guy from the beginning.

Ronnie has never matched Dorian's combo of size and condition.....now I will patiently wait for you to post 98O and 2001AC pictures of a 245lb Ronnie LOL

[IceCold]

The funniest thing is your naivete with the stock excuse, when everyone knows Dillet had far fewer flaws than Yates.

paul's only real flaw was his back.

but apparently, having a weak back is a MAJOR flaw.

just ask nasser. 

paul had fewer flaws that just about anybody.

but his combination of bad presentation - which is everything- and his lousy back prevented paul from even beating shaw, kevin, etc.

you're making it sound as if paul was 2nd to dorian if every show.

you only singled out yates because he is white.

why in 1100 pages have you not mentioned paul once?

now, you cant stop sucking his dick.

keepin' it it on the down low like all the rest of 'em?

[IceCold]

you really don't know what to say do you?

first of all, posting a  few pics of dorian loosing poses IS enough in this sport - this is bodybuilding competition, its not essay writing or mathematics.

the evidence needed is found ONSTAGE, and when you get PERFECT SCORE AFTER PERFECT SCORE despite LOOSING ALL THESE POSES the evidence becomes VERY CREDIBLE..

Secondly, no one knows WHY Joe Weider favored yates. Why has nothing to do with it - he obviously had reasons.

the point is that ONSTAGE PROOF shows that POST TEAR Yates WAS favored, hell, so was pre-tear yates with the most partial judging seen onstage in a long long time in 93 (muscularity round fiasco).

deal with it.

You make the stupid claim that yourself and the judges and 'reality' interpret the pics differently than we do..

well guess what?

so did many people during dorian's post tear reign - anyone who followed dorian's wins in 94, 96 and 97 will tell you that..

people say the same thing about ronnie in 2000, 2001, 20002, and 2005. 

you failed to realize that just bc you and some newport smoking bum on his bowflex in the ghetto think yates should not have won means absolutely nothing.

like i've said before, your interpretation of the pictures is JUST YOUR INTERPRETATION.

history has proven you wrong.

what you see in the pictures is not absolute.

[Hulkster]

like i've said before, your interpretation of the pictures is JUST YOUR INTERPRETATION.

well, then it is fair to say that you are a complete idiot if you "interpret" these shots as looking good (esp compared to your competition) and to be deserving of perfect scores....

shows a real lack of good judgement when it comes to bodybuilding competition...

[Hulkster]

history has proven you wrong.

no, history has proven that the judges are often way off...usually because of bias for various reasons..

no better evidence of this than most of dorian's post tear reign..oh, wait, that was most of his career..

[Hulkster]

Matt has been a biased guy from the beginning.

Ronnie has never matched Dorian's combo of size and condition.....now I will patiently wait for you to post 98O and 2001AC pictures of a 245lb Ronnie LOL

LOL size and condition?

dorian looks as smooth and doughy as can be:

while Ronnie on the other hand..well, the pics don't lie:

[pobrecito]

Ronnie could only dream of being this low in bodyfat and subcutenous water.....Yates was drier than the Sahara 

[IceCold]

LOL size and condition?

dorian looks as smooth and doughy as can be:

while Ronnie on the other hand..well, the pics don't lie:

yeah, the pics dont lie.

[pobrecito]

Ronnie looked like shit in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004, and 2006. He should be a 4 time Mr. Olympia at best.

[IceCold]

well, then it is fair to say that you are a complete idiot if you "interpret" these shots as looking good (esp compared to your competition) and to be deserving of perfect scores....

shows a real lack of good judgement when it comes to bodybuilding competition...

shawn is way too small in that pic and it looks like he's holding a lot of water.

notice his abs arent there.

nasser looks great, but is not on par with yates' condtioning (even when he failed the test that year), but yates torso is harder and his legs in that shot look better.

do you even look at the pics before posting ?

[IceCold]

no, history has proven that the judges are often way off...usually because of bias for various reasons..

no better evidence of this than most of dorian's post tear reign..oh, wait, that was most of his career..

excuses, excuses, excuses.

you are a pathetically sore looser.

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie has never matched Dorian's combo of size and condition.....now I will patiently wait for you to post 98O and 2001AC pictures of a 245lb Ronnie LOL

yawn, we've been through this over and over. You can repeat yourself and click your high-heels together all you want. That still doesn't make what you say true. Ronnie equaled, if not surpassed, Dorian's conditioning and weighed 247 lbs at the 01 ASC.

[Hulkster]

shawn is way too small in that pic and it looks like he's holding a lot of water.

notice his abs arent there.

thats because he's hitting A VACUUM!!! 

<shakes head>

IceCold, you are having a visibly difficult time trying to justify dorian's post tear reign.

it is sad to watch.

almost as sad as this:

[Hulkster]

excuses, excuses, excuses.

you are a pathetically sore looser.

I would love to hear your "excuse" as to how dorian won:

[IceCold]

thats because he's hitting A VACUUM!!! 

<shakes head>

notice the outline of zane's abs are still there even in the vaccum.

notice the lack of that in shawn from 96. 

[Hulkster]