Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3496850 times)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30400 on: June 22, 2007, 09:45:30 AM »

calves the same size?

just like how ronnie has better thighs that platz?

do i need to start another thread with the whole board making fun of your dumb, monkey ass?

Again, you are a slow reader. I never said Levrone had better calves. I said the calves look pretty even in that particular shot. Is that so hard to understand? No one bashed me in that thread. The joke was on you. No one even mentioned my name. Next time, just re-read before you post, ok asshole?


Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30401 on: June 22, 2007, 09:54:15 AM »
notice how its the same 4 pathetic nuthuggers since day 1 - hulkster, iceman, dumpster, and neo.

yet, every now and then another person chimes in saying the exact oppsite of what those fags say whether it be pubes, squadfather, camel jockey, phys, rocket, etc.

LOL, what are you talking about asshole?

I have a whole different website saying that a 99 & 03 Ronnie crushes/kills/murders/humiliates etc. a 93 & 95 yates. If you can actually read the thread, posts made by others, you will see that they are big yates fans that are voting and admiting that 99 & 03 Ronnie is clearly better and is the best.

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3109401

Who is better 99/03 Ronnie or 93/95 Yates?

                  Votes
1999 Ronnie    106    35.81%
2003 Ronnie    137    46.28%
1993 Yates       22     7.43% LOL
1995 Yates       31   10.47% LOL

Don't start crying now you.



Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30402 on: June 22, 2007, 10:01:23 AM »
Oh look, what do we have here? Simular results as the other website poll.

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=9710

Who is better 99/03 Ronnie or 93/95 Yates? 

                                  Votes
Ronnie 1999 Mr. Olympia    31 43.66%
Ronnie 2003 Mr. Olympia    28 39.44%
Yates  1993 Mr. Olympia      4 5.63%  LOL
Yates  1995 Mr. Olympia      8 11.27% LOL

Just give up already

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30403 on: June 22, 2007, 10:06:46 AM »
Oh. Another thread stating that Ronnie 99 is the best ever? I believe so

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=4268

Pack your bags and go home you pricks

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30404 on: June 22, 2007, 10:12:51 AM »
Who has the best back so far in bodybuilding history? 

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=2974091
                     
                  Votes

Joel Stubbs       62  18.67%
Ron Coleman    170  51.20%
Dorian Yates      83  25.00% LOL
Other               17    5.12%

Ronnie with more than double the votes of yates. yates and Stubbs in a close race for 2nd, LOL.

Anyway you look at it. You 2, "asshole" and "pubic" are pathetic along with your other goons.

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30405 on: June 22, 2007, 10:24:31 AM »
Oh look, what do we have here? Simular results as the other website poll.

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=9710

Who is better 99/03 Ronnie or 93/95 Yates? 

                                  Votes
Ronnie 1999 Mr. Olympia    31 43.66%
Ronnie 2003 Mr. Olympia    28 39.44%
Yates  1993 Mr. Olympia      4 5.63%  LOL
Yates  1995 Mr. Olympia      8 11.27% LOL

Just give up already


Proof of how people are more concerned with who is current/fashionable than who is better.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30406 on: June 22, 2007, 10:45:38 AM »
Quotes from this thread:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=2974091&page=2

"Ronnie's back is just more pleasing to the eye, plus he has *much* greater thickness.[/quote]

I retract my statemant after seeing these other pics of Stubbs ....Coleman is 1st then its a close call between Yates and Stubbs"

Now for other quotes on another thread admitting Ronnie is better:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3109401

"Are you seriously asking this? Dorian shouldn't even be discussed in the same category as Ronnie Coleman in my opinion. Dorian was great yes, but Ronnie is the greatest bodybuilder this sport has ever seen. End of story, end of thread."

"Agreed.
Even the 99' Coleman completely blows Yates away.
Coleman is the greatest bber ever, hands down."

"1999 and 2003 Coleman is better than anything Yates ever brought to the stage, both great bodybuilders in thier own right but Ronnie and Arnold are in a class of thier own."

"Dorian is one of the greatest for sure, but Ronnie clearly deserves the title of "best bodybuilder of all time".

"im not really a fan of yates physique at all. i dont find his arms that impressive compared to other mr. olympias. ronnie for sure in this battle."

"03 coleman absolutely smashes dorian. Esp dorian with a horrible-looking torn bicep."

"This is a no-brainer. Ronnie takes the cake. No doubt."

"Judging by Neo's pics on page 2, Coleman DESTROYS Yates"

"I prefer Ronnie's '99 look. Best combination of size and asthetics, imo. Dorian was great, just not as great as Ronnie."

Quotes from yates fand admitting Ronnie is better, same thread:

"Yates is one of my favorite bodybuilders, but being objectionable, the 2003 form of Ronnie is just unbeatable. Yates admitted himself that Ron would have beaten him."

"Im a top fan of both of them, in overhead ab pose & side tri pose Yates would have edged him out but its Coleman all the way on all the other poses. 2003 where he was a conditioned 287 was out of this world & wont be matched for another decade. Even Yates said that he looked like a cartoon character he was so unbelievable. 99 was also very good, does anyone know how much he weighed there? It was a great combination of both size & aesthetics."

"I love Yates, but he doesn't hold a candle to Ronnie. Yates was a "mass monster" and Ronnie makes him look like an amateur."

"Dorian has always been one of my favourites mainly due to work ethic and intensity. But Ronnie 2003 smashes all before him and since.

Dorians gut was the original belly which started the tradition that is so evident today. Yes Ronnies has gone bigger now but he also packs more mass on then Dorian ever did.

This is a subjective sport but how anyone can objectively view Yates physique as being superior to Ronnies in BB terms boggles the mind."

Now how can you idiots say that we are the only ones that are claiming Ronnie is better than yates? The thread, polls and posts made by others speak for themselves.

Now go home and get back to reality.










Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30407 on: June 22, 2007, 10:53:34 AM »
Now for more quotes from another website about the same poll:
http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=9710

"That bicep tear on Yates in 95 looks terrible....that kinda threw that out for me. 93 Yates was crazy, but I say 99 and 03 Ronnie still beat him.

03 Ronnie was freakier (bigger), but I find his 99 physique to "flow" much better. I'd put it like this (Ronnie's can go either way, just preference):

99 Ronnie
03 Ronnie
93 Yates
95 Yates"

"By these pics... Ronnie 99 and 2003 is BY FAR much better than Yates."

"
Ronnie Coleman has the best back in the history of bodybuilding: Size, thickness, detail, width, etc. Dorian had a great back but can not compete against the package that Ronnie brought 98' and up. On top of the fact that Ronnie had Yates beat on arms by miles, much bigger and better legs and chest in my opinion. You cant compete with this im sorry....."


Quotes from yates fans:

"I am a HUGE Yates fan, but.............

2003 Ronnie.

On the whole, I still like Yates better than Ronnie. Maybe it's just because I've always had shitty genetics and I can relate better to Yates.

Regardless, Ronnie in 2003 was the King of all Freaks, the living comic book superhero."

"I love Yates and the grainy, dry look he had in 93 was/is unbeatable imo.
But progression is progression so Ron still wins."

Yeah, Hulkster, NEO and myself are the only people that think Ronnie is better than yates, LOL  ::)





pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30408 on: June 22, 2007, 10:57:22 AM »

WOW Dorian was from another planet in 93. Seriously he has this look that is full, masculer and grainny that none of the bodybuildes before or after his era have achieved.

IMO, The more you follow bodybuilding today, the more you appeciate a physice like Dorian's.

That shot where Dorian goes to hit the front lat at the end, his size and fullness is simply unbelievable. The more I watch 93, the more I feel he would easily defeat a 98/99/01AC Ronnie. The only version of Ronnie that could beat a 260lb Dorian is the 2003 version, but even then, Ronnie looked ugly.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30409 on: June 22, 2007, 11:07:16 AM »
Now for quotes from other people agreeing that 99 Ronnie is the best ever:
http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=4268

"the 99 RC is the best physique to ever step onstage"

"99= Ronnies best ever"

01' ASC-"That physique is untouchable, but his best ever? i don't know, at the 2001 arnold classic he was amazing as well, but there are definite lack of pics from that show. He was absolutely spot on for that one. I personally 2001 Arnold Classic Ronnie is by far the best physique to hit a bbing stage."

On Flex 99-"I actually thought Flex should have won before, but have since changed my mind on that"

"theres not a soul on this planet that could beat his shape in 99 from almost any year"

"those pics make him look like he owned the best ever deltoids in history"

"Ronnie Coleman from the 1999 Olympia is the best physique ever, period."

"nothings gonna beat his physique from the 1999 O."

"99 Ronnie Coleman... thge greatest EVER!!! COLEMAN 1999>ANYBODY!!!"

"EVERYBODY PART IS ALMOST PERFECT, JUST LOOK AT HIS INCREDIBLE PAIR OF TRICEPS, OK, BUT LETīS TALK ABOUT CALVES, FOR CALVES IT SEEMS THAT RONNIE DISPLAYED IN 2004 HIS BEST VERSION OF CALVES, PLEASE SOMEONE WHO PUT A PIC FROM 2004, YOU WILL SEE THE DIFFERENCE, BUT OH MY GOD HIS PECS, HIS TRAPS, AND HIS BACK IN 1999 LOOKED AWESOME"

"almost perfection"

We sure are alone on what we think about 99 Ronnie  ::)











Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30410 on: June 22, 2007, 01:49:50 PM »
so, what excuses will Icehole come up with now?... ::)

great thread over there.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30411 on: June 22, 2007, 01:52:38 PM »
Now for more quotes from another website about the same poll:
http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=9710

"That bicep tear on Yates in 95 looks terrible....that kinda threw that out for me. 93 Yates was crazy, but I say 99 and 03 Ronnie still beat him.

03 Ronnie was freakier (bigger), but I find his 99 physique to "flow" much better. I'd put it like this (Ronnie's can go either way, just preference):

99 Ronnie
03 Ronnie
93 Yates
95 Yates"

"By these pics... Ronnie 99 and 2003 is BY FAR much better than Yates."

"
Ronnie Coleman has the best back in the history of bodybuilding: Size, thickness, detail, width, etc. Dorian had a great back but can not compete against the package that Ronnie brought 98' and up. On top of the fact that Ronnie had Yates beat on arms by miles, much bigger and better legs and chest in my opinion. You cant compete with this im sorry....."


Quotes from yates fans:

"I am a HUGE Yates fan, but.............

2003 Ronnie.

On the whole, I still like Yates better than Ronnie. Maybe it's just because I've always had shitty genetics and I can relate better to Yates.

Regardless, Ronnie in 2003 was the King of all Freaks, the living comic book superhero."

"I love Yates and the grainy, dry look he had in 93 was/is unbeatable imo.
But progression is progression so Ron still wins."

Yeah, Hulkster, NEO and myself are the only people that think Ronnie is better than yates, LOL  ::)





99 ronnie as 31 votes and dorian 93 has 4.

ahahahaha


COUNTDOWN TO EXCUSES...5..4...3...2.. .1... ::) ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30412 on: June 22, 2007, 01:55:03 PM »
Proof of how people are more concerned with who is current/fashionable than who is better.

LOL HOW IS 99 RONNIE 'CURRENT AND FASHIONABLE".??

 ::)



I think we have a severe lack of brains on the dorian side here folks...
Flower Boy Ran Away

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30413 on: June 22, 2007, 02:22:40 PM »
so, what excuses will Icehole come up with now?... ::)

great thread over there.


i posted other polls before from elite fitness, mayhem, etc.  saying the exact opposite.

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30414 on: June 22, 2007, 02:34:46 PM »
LOL HOW IS 99 RONNIE 'CURRENT AND FASHIONABLE".??

 ::)



I think we have a severe lack of brains on the dorian side here folks...

Becuase Ronnie is still competing and is a well known name.

Most of those people voting in those thread have no clue who Yates even is, and even if they do, they just base their opinion off a few pictures.

On an educated board, such as Ironage, Yates won the poll  ;)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30415 on: June 22, 2007, 02:55:48 PM »
Read carefully nutt-huggers :-*


" Good God!!

In an earlier post, I mentioned that I had always believed that Dorian Yates became Mr. Olympia because he was proportioned and that for the most part, his competitors only saw his mass and tried to compete with him on size.

This photo comparison truly confirms for me that belief. I truly believe that in each and every comparison, Yates defeats Coleman. I honestly do.

His proportions totally blow away Coleman's. I think that it can be argued that perhaps Dorian Yates was the last of the 'Ironage' bodybuilders, bodybuilders that strived for proportionate development. Certainly he was the last Mr. Olympia to display proportioned development.

Thankyou very, very much Quadzilla for posting those photos!


- Sleiman Azizi -"


"Regardless, to my eyes Dorain has easily the superior physique in those comparsions. Fo me, the only thing Ronnie has over Dorian is biceps and that's about it."

"Yates in EVERY  comparison pose bar the very last one, for my money.

I must confess, I'm a little surprised at this myself... Yates's physique, whilst impressive, has never really been my cup of tea. But it really shows what a mess Coleman has become when Yates starts to look positively aesthetic when measured against him.."

"The arguement over at getbig is Ronnie has him on delts (size), quads (size), biceps (size).
The people that say this believe just because these parts are bigger that Ronnie has Dorian beat.
Ronnie just looks like he's been chucked together."

"These comparison pics make you realise how important balance is, and how important calves are!!

Ronnies bigger quads I see as a disadvantage, yet Dorians bigger calves do not seem a disadvantage?!

IMHO "

"The '93 Dorian is one of my all time favourite physiques, I think it's a stretch to call him aesthetic, but I think those pictures do illustrate that at this point in his career he was huge and proportionate,whilst he was a little wide in the waist he wasn't distended at this point and it fitted with the rest of his physique.I think he does Ronnie in nearly every pose and bodypart(and this from a self confessed Coleman fan)"

"Ronnie has bad gyno and looks like he just swalllowed a bowling ball in those pics. Ronnie carries more weight but his physique is sloppy and his bodyparts (other than the ham-glute tie in, which is not a look I like but is noteworthy anyway) have no continuity.  His back is enormous, but is watery, lacks good definition, and resembles a ham more than back musculature.

Yates has proportion at least by comparison, and truly outstanding calf development and great back thickness/definition combo. His abs are tight( at least relative to coleman) and he has no gyno.  He is cut and dry unlike ronnie.  I never thought I'd say it, but I think Yates is the lesser of two evils here."


And here we have an intelligent response to Pumpster's bullshit he tried passing over at Ironage based on the shitty little 96 screencap LOL

"to pumpster ronnie looks better because of the picture put yates next to him on the same stage .The olympia 96 pic is a perfect example what is going on here is similar to Parrellax error.I.e the closer person and the angle make one person appear bigger in reality that is not the case.Yates was good in fact I barely seen a riiped bodybuilder since yates reign"

"As Street said above,photo comparisons from different shows mean nothing,you HAVE to see them onstage side by side in the same show to judge them. I`ve seen them together onstage,and Dorian was [in a] different class."

"Coleman was freakier.

Yates was more balanced.

Both were great champions.

Personally, I'd take the balance. Bodybuilding for me is building the entire body in proportion so no bodypart dominates another. I believe Yates did a better job (or has better genetics for balance). Coupled with the ability to present a grainier, harder physique, it makes him the winner in my eyes."

"To me the Dorian of 1993 was the best physique ever seen - and he was better, bigger and heavier in the iconic Kevin Horton photos. Virtually faultless, and I just wish he would have entered the Olympia in that shape because he still would have won easily.
I can see Coleman taking the back shots but Overall its Dorian for me."




Neo/Hulkster: Now please continue on with your crap Bodybuilding.com poll's based on the opinion of 14 year olds hahahahahah

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30416 on: June 22, 2007, 02:59:39 PM »
Read carefully nutt-huggers :-*


" Good God!!

In an earlier post, I mentioned that I had always believed that Dorian Yates became Mr. Olympia because he was proportioned and that for the most part, his competitors only saw his mass and tried to compete with him on size.

This photo comparison truly confirms for me that belief. I truly believe that in each and every comparison, Yates defeats Coleman. I honestly do.

His proportions totally blow away Coleman's. I think that it can be argued that perhaps Dorian Yates was the last of the 'Ironage' bodybuilders, bodybuilders that strived for proportionate development. Certainly he was the last Mr. Olympia to display proportioned development.

Thankyou very, very much Quadzilla for posting those photos!


- Sleiman Azizi -"


"Regardless, to my eyes Dorain has easily the superior physique in those comparsions. Fo me, the only thing Ronnie has over Dorian is biceps and that's about it."

"Yates in EVERY  comparison pose bar the very last one, for my money.

I must confess, I'm a little surprised at this myself... Yates's physique, whilst impressive, has never really been my cup of tea. But it really shows what a mess Coleman has become when Yates starts to look positively aesthetic when measured against him.."

"The arguement over at getbig is Ronnie has him on delts (size), quads (size), biceps (size).
The people that say this believe just because these parts are bigger that Ronnie has Dorian beat.
Ronnie just looks like he's been chucked together."

"These comparison pics make you realise how important balance is, and how important calves are!!

Ronnies bigger quads I see as a disadvantage, yet Dorians bigger calves do not seem a disadvantage?!

IMHO "

"The '93 Dorian is one of my all time favourite physiques, I think it's a stretch to call him aesthetic, but I think those pictures do illustrate that at this point in his career he was huge and proportionate,whilst he was a little wide in the waist he wasn't distended at this point and it fitted with the rest of his physique.I think he does Ronnie in nearly every pose and bodypart(and this from a self confessed Coleman fan)"

"Ronnie has bad gyno and looks like he just swalllowed a bowling ball in those pics. Ronnie carries more weight but his physique is sloppy and his bodyparts (other than the ham-glute tie in, which is not a look I like but is noteworthy anyway) have no continuity.  His back is enormous, but is watery, lacks good definition, and resembles a ham more than back musculature.

Yates has proportion at least by comparison, and truly outstanding calf development and great back thickness/definition combo. His abs are tight( at least relative to coleman) and he has no gyno.  He is cut and dry unlike ronnie.  I never thought I'd say it, but I think Yates is the lesser of two evils here."


And here we have an intelligent response to Pumpster's bullshit he tried passing over at Ironage based on the shitty little 96 screencap LOL

"to pumpster ronnie looks better because of the picture put yates next to him on the same stage .The olympia 96 pic is a perfect example what is going on here is similar to Parrellax error.I.e the closer person and the angle make one person appear bigger in reality that is not the case.Yates was good in fact I barely seen a riiped bodybuilder since yates reign"

"As Street said above,photo comparisons from different shows mean nothing,you HAVE to see them onstage side by side in the same show to judge them. I`ve seen them together onstage,and Dorian was [in a] different class." [/size]

"Coleman was freakier.

Yates was more balanced.

Both were great champions.

Personally, I'd take the balance. Bodybuilding for me is building the entire body in proportion so no bodypart dominates another. I believe Yates did a better job (or has better genetics for balance). Coupled with the ability to present a grainier, harder physique, it makes him the winner in my eyes."

"To me the Dorian of 1993 was the best physique ever seen - and he was better, bigger and heavier in the iconic Kevin Horton photos. Virtually faultless, and I just wish he would have entered the Olympia in that shape because he still would have won easily.
I can see Coleman taking the back shots but Overall its Dorian for me."




Neo/Hulkster: Now please continue on with your crap Bodybuilding.com poll's based on the opinion of 14 year olds hahahahahah



I THINK U NEED TO GET LAID U REEK OF BITTERNESS & RESENTMENT DEFENDING A LOSING POSITION FROM YOUR BASEMENT LOL

"Yates the lesser of two evils" sounds like a ringing endorsement from another Ironage clone hahahahahaahh

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30417 on: June 22, 2007, 03:38:14 PM »

i posted other polls before from elite fitness, mayhem, etc.  saying the exact opposite.



yes, and you no doubt didn't use shots of Ronnie 99 as you claim they are 'fake' ::)

post the 93 dorian vs 99 Ronnie shots and you get the same result every time:

Ronnie wins by a landslide...
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30418 on: June 22, 2007, 03:55:36 PM »
see, since you are slow, I'l explain how it works:

if you just ask people who is better Ronnie or dorian,

they will remember dorian's 93 best and think about Ronnie's 300 pound current look..

and they might say dorian was better.

BUT if you SHOW THEM what Ronnie used to look like compared to dorian, you get this:

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php?t=9710

dorian not even close LOL
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30419 on: June 22, 2007, 03:59:05 PM »
Quote
anyone else think Yates back isn't nearly as impressive on stage as it is off stage? Those pics of his BDB and Lat spread don't scream "best back ever" to me... Coleman blows him out of the water.

LOL agreed!

we have long talked about how hohum dorian's rear double bi is compared to ronnie's..esp. the pancake thickness part..

nice to know we are normal in our opinions...
Flower Boy Ran Away

Dorian01

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1264
  • Coach loves the sticky studs
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30420 on: June 22, 2007, 04:20:36 PM »
Yates, clearly the greatest bodybuilder of all time. Coleman, clearly the worst of all time.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30421 on: June 22, 2007, 05:13:10 PM »
Yates, clearly the greatest bodybuilder of all time. Coleman, clearly the worst of all time.
Consider the source.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30422 on: June 22, 2007, 05:18:37 PM »
LOL if yates is the 'greatest of all time' I want a second opinion! :-\
Flower Boy Ran Away

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30423 on: June 22, 2007, 06:31:49 PM »
LOL HOW IS 99 RONNIE 'CURRENT AND FASHIONABLE".??

 ::)



I think we have a severe lack of brains on the dorian side here folks...

You don't get it do you? The majority of nuthuggers that post on this board grew up in the Coleman era. I'm one of the few Getbig members that grew up and started working out in Yates' era. It's a well known fact that people today are more concerned with who is current/fashionable than who is good. The same applies to music, movies, comedy etc.

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #30424 on: June 22, 2007, 06:37:09 PM »
You don't get it do you? The majority of nuthuggers that post on this board grew up in the Coleman era. I'm one of the few Getbig members that grew up and started working out in Yates' era. It's a well known fact that people today are more concerned with who is current/fashionable than who is good. The same applies to music, movies, comedy etc.
so true.