Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3491874 times)

IceCold · « **Reply #30650 on:** June 27, 2007, 07:08:22 PM »

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=156649.0

notice the # of NEW people who say yates.

Hulkster · « **Reply #30651 on:** June 27, 2007, 07:10:26 PM »

wow. 3 people.

thats about equal to the number of total number of votes dorian got on the other polls...

Hulkster · « **Reply #30652 on:** June 27, 2007, 07:12:06 PM »

and besides, that thread does NOT SHOW 99 ronnie vs 93 dorian like all the other threads do.

when that happens,

dorian gets 3 or 4 votes, and Ronnie gets 50 or 60..

IceCold · « **Reply #30653 on:** June 27, 2007, 07:17:26 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 27, 2007, 07:12:06 PM

and besides, that thread does NOT SHOW 99 ronnie vs 93 dorian like all the other threads do.

when that happens,

dorian gets 3 or 4 votes, and Ronnie gets 50 or 60..

like those people dont know about ronnie from 93.

besides, every quote in reference to ronnie's dominance, esp. the ones neo keeps posting are all about ronnie in 2003.

THERE IS NOTHING FROM 99.

did you not see the olympia review from 99 where nothing was even written about the best ever?

unlike 93.

Hulkster · « **Reply #30654 on:** June 27, 2007, 07:23:18 PM »

excuses excuses

dorian hardly gets any votes at all when shown against Ronnie 99.

deal with it.

IceCold · « **Reply #30655 on:** June 27, 2007, 07:40:07 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 27, 2007, 07:23:18 PM

excuses excuses

dorian hardly gets any votes at all when shown against Ronnie 99.

deal with it.

your 1 poll.

deal with it.

Hulkster · « **Reply #30656 on:** June 27, 2007, 08:09:49 PM »

LOL no, it was much more than three polls.

just ask Iceman

pobrecito · « **Reply #30657 on:** June 27, 2007, 08:18:45 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 27, 2007, 08:09:49 PM

LOL no, it was much more than three polls.

just ask Iceman

you mean your gimmick account?

The only poll that matters is Ironage...which Yates won

Hulkster · « **Reply #30658 on:** June 27, 2007, 08:20:41 PM »

the only poll that matters is IRONAGE

Ive heard it all now..

ps I highly doubt the best shots of ronnie 99 and dorian 93 were shown on there like they were in Icemans polls.

pobrecito · « **Reply #30659 on:** June 27, 2007, 08:23:34 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 27, 2007, 08:20:41 PM

the only poll that matters is IRONAGE

Ive heard it all now..

ps I highly doubt the best shots of ronnie 99 and dorian 93 were shown on there like they were in Icemans polls.

Iceman's shots are BIASED AS ALL HELL

You still can't explain the fact why Dorian was as dominant as he was except "politics"

Yet, you can't explain why there would be politics.

Hulkster · « **Reply #30660 on:** June 27, 2007, 09:40:57 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 27, 2007, 08:23:34 PM

Iceman's shots are BIASED AS ALL HELL

You still can't explain the fact why Dorian was as dominant as he was except "politics" Yet, you can't explain why there would be politics.

no, its not politics.

its because the judges favored size over quality.

not sure if I would call that 'politics' or not, its more like flawed judging.

look no farther than 1994 for one of the best examples of size and horrible looking mass over quality ever in the sport:

Hulkster · « **Reply #30661 on:** June 27, 2007, 09:42:16 PM »

Quote

Iceman's shots are BIASED AS ALL HELL

if you actually looked at the shots he used, you would see that they are a very accurate and fair representiation of both men.

hence, why Ronnie has more than 10X dorian's votes..

CARTEL · « **Reply #30662 on:** June 27, 2007, 09:42:56 PM »

Hi Guys.

What are you talking about in this thread?

IceCold · « **Reply #30663 on:** June 27, 2007, 10:20:12 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 27, 2007, 09:40:57 PM

no, its not politics.

its because the judges favored size over quality.

not sure if I would call that 'politics' or not, its more like flawed judging.

look no farther than 1994 for one of the best examples of size and horrible looking mass over quality ever in the sport:

but yates wasnt the biggest, so what is your excuse now?

Figo · « **Reply #30664 on:** June 28, 2007, 12:19:22 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 27, 2007, 02:43:34 PM

the closest Mr. O to complete was probably samir in 83 but even then he had flaws..

What would you say was flawed?

Alex23 · « **Reply #30665 on:** June 28, 2007, 12:36:40 AM »

Quote from: Figo on June 28, 2007, 12:19:22 AM

What would you say was flawed?

the fact that he's from Lebanon.

phyxsius · « **Reply #30666 on:** June 28, 2007, 12:56:55 AM »

Quote from: migizi on June 27, 2007, 03:17:03 PM

if Dorian never had the bicep tear, would his arms continue to grow or were they just genetically small? cuz if there was potential for his bi's to get bigger then I would say Dorian....but since that's speculation. Ronnie.

His arm will grow definitely if he didn't not had that tear.

Hulkster · « **Reply #30667 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:45:40 AM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 27, 2007, 10:20:12 PM

but yates wasnt the biggest, so what is your excuse now?

he was the biggest who had a back.

nasser and dillett owned dorian from the front but had no back.

Ronnie had a back, as well as owned dorian from the front at his best..

so, whats YOUR excuse?

pumpster · « **Reply #30668 on:** June 28, 2007, 03:49:07 AM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 27, 2007, 06:18:08 PM

damn, Ronnie is fucking destroyed here LOL

Ya Yates with tiny arms is "destroying" Coleman LOL

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #30669 on:** June 28, 2007, 08:54:39 AM »

Quote from: pobrecito on June 27, 2007, 08:23:34 PM

Iceman's shots are BIASED AS ALL HELL

You still can't explain the fact why Dorian was as dominant as he was except "politics" Yet, you can't explain why there would be politics.

What the f*uck, are you blind? I used the best shots from 93 for yates and he still got crushed. So are you saying I'm biased for using "good" pics of yates now? You're the only BYTCH complaining out of hundreds of people who voted. LOL, you're just pathetic.

Figo · « **Reply #30670 on:** June 28, 2007, 09:22:59 AM »

Quote from: Alex23 is Back on June 28, 2007, 12:36:40 AM

the fact that he's from Lebanon.

Whats wrong with Lebanon?

Here is a beautiful pic I took on holiday...

pumpster · « **Reply #30671 on:** June 28, 2007, 09:34:13 AM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on June 28, 2007, 08:54:39 AM

What the f*uck, are you blind? I used the best shots from 93 for yates and he still got crushed. So are you saying I'm biased for using "good" pics of yates now? You're the only BYTCH complaining out of hundreds of people who voted. LOL, you're just pathetic.

Were you expecting brilliance from someone who uses an ethnic name with 27 letters that no one can remember?

IceCold · « **Reply #30672 on:** June 28, 2007, 09:46:40 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 28, 2007, 03:45:40 AM

he was the biggest who had a back.

nasser and dillett owned dorian from the front but had no back.

Ronnie had a back, as well as owned dorian from the front at his best..

so, whats YOUR excuse?

you are the one who needs excuses.

you refuse to accept reality.

pumpster · « **Reply #30673 on:** June 28, 2007, 09:58:25 AM »

Quote from: IceCold on June 28, 2007, 09:46:40 AM

you are the one who needs excuses.

you refuse to accept reality.

Completely empty comeback; shooting blanks again.

pobrecito · « **Reply #30674 on:** June 28, 2007, 11:10:49 AM »

Dorian is owning Ronnie in that comparison, bigger and more conditioned. Shape and cuts are overrated.