Here's a list of retarded things that the Coleman spooge-suckers have claiming several times:
- That Ronnie was more dominant than Dorian, even though Dorian had five out of six straight-firsts Olympia victories while he had less.
- That Dorian's gut at the 1995 Olympia was worse than that of Coleman at the 2003 Olympia.
- That Coleman carried more lean muscle mass at 247 lbs than at 257 lbs, even though Coleman was at 3% bodyfat at 257lbs.
- That Dorian should have lost the Olympia due to his torn biceps, which comprises 3% of the muscle mass of a Human body
- That a 260 lbs Dorian carried less lean muscle mass than a 247 lbs Coleman, even though they had about equal bodyfat levels and that their difference in skeletel frame weight was at best 5 lbs.
- That things look in a photography exactly how they look in loco, thus claiming that I was using a "photoelectric effect" explanation for why Dorian looked best in person than on pics.
I grew tired of arguing with the Coleman fans because they are fanatics who don't respond to reason, logic and common sense. Not only that, most of them are biased towards the 2003 showing of Coleman, his second worse performance ever besides 2004.
SUCKMYMUSCLE