they do mean the same, you dipshit. I asked you to prove me wrong using the dictionary. If there is a separate definition for bodybuilding, then it will be mentioned in there like they always do.
conditioning is objective. I can see with my own eyes that 01 ASC Ronnie has better conditioning than Dorian. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Ronnie carried overall less body fat and water. Ronnie displayed the same trademarks as Dorian - insanely detailed back, prominent cheekbones, grainy skin - and then some.
they do mean the same, you dipshit. I asked you to prove me wrong using the dictionary. If there is a separate definition for bodybuilding, then it will be mentioned in there like they always do.
wow I guess Dorian and I are ' dip shits ' Neo you're defeated plain & simple
nterview with David Robson
[ Q ] What were some of your better physical qualities as a bodybuilder, do you think?
Obviously I carried a lot of muscle mass and my trademark was to come into a show in super hard condition. I think my muscles had a certain quality and density from all the years of heavy training that a lot of guys didn't have.
One thing that I think people underrated me on - it was never really mentioned because of my sheer physical size and condition - was my
balance and proportion. Not only from muscle group to muscle group, but from upper body to lower body. My skeletal structure and everything else was there and in good balance.
conditioning is objective. I can see with my own eyes that 01 ASC Ronnie has better conditioning than Dorian. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Ronnie carried overall less body fat and water. Ronnie displayed the same trademarks as Dorian - insanely detailed back, prominent cheekbones, grainy skin - and then some.
One you're basing your opinion on Dorian's conditioning on an inaccurate means see the many quotes of how Yates looks light years ahead of the way he looks in pictures and video , so for you to ascertain his level of conditioning based on a inaccurate means shows you're not interested in accuracy and you're letting bias guide your thought process ( see your comparisons as well )
and while I'm sure you really believe Ronnie 2001 has less body fat and water that doesn't mean anything , I wasn't there and neither were you so we have to take it on authority of other who were , namely Dorian who said he has better conditioning , and Priest and Peter Mcgough who said
"These words should not be taken lightly, because no bodybuilder has ever been as hard and dry as the man who won six Sandows."See Neo I think 2001 Ronnie was as dry and hard as a bodybuilder gets , the same with Dorian 1995 , please don't confuse more striations than Dorian as ' proof ' he's better conditioned its NOT striations are genetic
You really haven't made your case , especially not in the light of the above . nice try though .
