exactly.
even yates can see that ronnie's proportions were fantastic, and much better than his own:
you can clearly see the barrel torso with the undersized arms, whereas Ronnie's proportions are great:
Oh Ronnie's proportions were great his BALANCE & PROPORTIONS aren't great and they aren't on Dorian's level how well are his calves in proportion with his quads? great Ummm I don't think so , How well are his forearms proportioned to his biceps/triceps? Great Ummm I don't think so , how well are his overdeveloped glutes in proportion with his entire physique? great? Ummmm I don't think so
Lee Priest
HOW DO YOU FEEL DORIAN WOULD FAIR AGAINST RONNIE COLEMAN NOW?
I think Dorian at his best (1993) would easily beat Ronnie. Dorian might not be as symmetrical as Ronnie, but all over he was
more complete and in better condition at his best.Bev Francis : Bodybuilder's phsyique you most admire ?
The man Dorian Yates , his combonation of size and shape makes for an awesome physique , unlike a lot of big guys he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together , His symmetry is almost perfect ,
Everything is in proportion , no weak bodyparts .
Interview with David Robson
[ Q ] What were some of your better physical qualities as a bodybuilder, do you think?
Obviously I carried a lot of muscle mass and my trademark was to come into a show in super hard condition. I think my muscles had a certain quality and density from all the years of heavy training that a lot of guys didn't have.
One thing that I think people underrated me on - it was never really mentioned because of my sheer physical size and condition -
was my balance and proportion. Not only from muscle group to muscle group, but from upper body to lower body. My skeletal structure and everything else was there and in good balance.
Notice the refference to Ronnie a whole lot of parts thrown together? anyone who thinks Ronnie has better
balance & proportion is high or better conditioning & density