Coleman says himself on BFTO 99 that he was in better condition at the 1998.
When Ron was at a lighter weight 98, 99 2001 AChis calves wouldn't be considered out of proportion.Later on as he got heavier the proportion in calvesto thighs became much more of a problem...
LOL the longer this thread goes on, the more and more obvious it is that Ronnie far eclipsed dorian:lol he is so far above its not even funny:
Why do you keep posting MM pics? That's all you ever fucking post. Like the MM matters.
Ronnie 1997 vs Dorian 1997.How did dorian win again? oh yeah, some of the worst judging ever. thats why.
ronnie > dorian
you are trying to tell truth and logic to people who have demonstrated the critical thinking skill and brains (except for Suckmyasshole - although he is slipping with that 94 conditioning comment ) of a fucking rock.it probably won't work..
Huckster, why is it that you always bring up the fact that there are more people who believe that Ronnie was better than Dorian, but yet you still insist that Ronnie was better conditioned even though more people believe that Dorian at his best had superior conditioning? This is a double-standard, sport, and it is something that you became famous for. SUCKMYMUSCLE
The proof? Dorian looks much, much harder than Ronnie.
Dorian is better conditioned there. Ronnie looks more vascular and separated, but those are both genetic factors, not an absolute level of condition.