Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pumpster]

a 270+ lbs Dorian would make Ronnie look small.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Yates at any weight is never making Coleman look small.

[GoneAway]

where are dorians lats in that shot? maybe its the angle.

[pumpster]

where are dorians lats in that shot? maybe its the angle.

Sure, "it's just the angle", just like his bis.

[alexxx]

Great thread! Thanks to everyone who posted pics. All the pics just show how much more Ronnie brought to the game. Yates couldn't match him on size other then back and legs. Everything else is just so much more advanced on Ronnie. His muscles are fuller, more mature, ripped and striated.

That is why he is the 8 time mr. Olympia!

[Hulkster]

Great thread! Thanks to everyone who posted pics. All the pics just show how much more Ronnie brought to the game. Yates couldn't match him on size other then back and legs. Everything else is just so much more advanced on Ronnie. His muscles are fuller, more mature, ripped and striated.

That is why he is the 8 time mr. Olympia!

exactly.

[IceCold]

so, it seems that after a month of non stop bashing and numerous threads making fun of pumpster, he's back thinking that no one will remember why he left in the first place.


go back to your bowflex.

everyone knows your story on this board and you are the biggest laughing stock of them all.

[IceCold]

Great thread! Thanks to everyone who posted pics. All the pics just show how much more Ronnie brought to the game. Yates couldn't match him on size other then back and legs. Everything else is just so much more advanced on Ronnie. His muscles are fuller, more mature, ripped and striated.

That is why he is the 8 time mr. Olympia!

that is why ronnie couldnt beat ANY of the guys of the 90's in their prime.

yeah, ronnie was not in his best shape, but neither were ANY of the guys whom he beat from 98-05.

there is a HUGE difference standing next to an all time best of ray, nasser, dillet, kevin, flex, etc. than jay, dexter, gustavo, gunter, etc.

you are only as good as who you beat.

that's why strength of schedule matters so much in college sports.

another example is ESPN's top 20 boxers.

ronnie jones, jr. is NOT in the top ten bc he didnt beat anybody great during his career.

[IceCold]

Yates at any weight is never making Coleman look small.

can someone post the shot that is in black and white of yates and ronnie doing the back double bi from 97 where ronnie was 260 lbs. and getting dwarfed by yates?

[IceCold]

most people can't believe he won in 94 and 96 either.

97 was just the icing on the cake..

his last great show was 93.

if you would have seen the video, you would know that yates won. pretty easily.

that why's he got (and always did) the loudest ovation of any guy onstage.

case in point, people booing this year at cutler winning.

for some reason, you think that the people who are there in person and watching the show live, are below your opinion of pics.

[Hulkster]

can someone post the shot that is in black and white of yates and ronnie doing the back double bi from 97 where ronnie was 260 lbs. and getting dwarfed by yates?

LOL remember what I said the other day about people being stupid enough to believe that Ronnie in 97 was not only bigger than his 99 form, but also bigger than dorian 93?

despite being visibly and noticably smaller in the quads, arms and back in 97 as compared to his 99 form?

LMAO leave it to IceCold to be one of the dumb ones LOL

 

just because a mag makes a typo does not mean ronnie was 260 pounds in 97.

anyone can see that he was not as big then as he was in 99. or bigger than dorian 93 in 97.

duh.

[Hulkster]

for some reason, you think that the people who are there in person and watching the show live, are below your opinion of pics.

and for some reason, you think that a bag of shit will turn into a bag of gold if you are sitting right in front of it:

 

ps its not just MY opinion that dorian looks like garbage in 97. its everyone's. even ND has publicly stated many times that he should have lost.

take it up with him. if he ever returns from his self imposed walkabout from utter embarassment after being owned on multiple threads at once LOL.

I suppose you think this looks great?

oh yeah, I forgot you have no clue how to evaluate a physique. thats why you think dorian was better than a peak Ronnie.

[Hulkster]

LOL at the stupid title change.

just more proof that the dorian fans are incapable of reading and understanding english..

add one more to the growing list of evidence that none of these clowns can comprehend english LOL

I said he had MORE DETAILED CALVES ONLY AND I PROVED IT QUITE EASILY IN 1999.

I guess all the dorian fans must be fresh off the boat because English, much like critical thinking, physique evaluations, and philosophy (LOL) are real stumbling blocks for them..

lol

[natural al]

LOL at the stupid title change.

just more proof that the dorian fans are incapable of reading and understanding english..

add one more to the growing list of evidence that none of these clowns can comprehend english LOL

I said he had MORE DETAILED CALVES ONLY AND I PROVED IT QUITE EASILY IN 1999.

I guess all the dorian fans must be fresh off the boat because English, much like critical thinking, physique evaluations, and philosophy (LOL) are real stumbling blocks for them..

lol

oh, my goodness......one pic comparisons don't proove anything...c'mon now Hulkster...

[Hulkster]

oh, my goodness......one pic comparisons don't proove anything...c'mon now Hulkster...

its not  a one pic comparison.

its an ANY pic comparison..

dorian's calves may have blown ronnie's away, but only because of size and shape.

not because of detail.

it doesn't matter which pic you use: the result is the same.

dorian's calves, much like the rest of his body (save for abs and lower back) were not as detailed as 99 Ronnie, who was so ripped and striated he had a skeleton's face:

[Hulkster]

still waiting for shots of dorian's calves that show more detail than those of Ronnie 99.

people are quick to dismiss the comment, without realizing that it is actually true.

[IceCold]

oh yeah, I forgot you have no clue how to evaluate a physique. thats why you think dorian was better than a peak Ronnie.

your the same tool who seems to think he knows everything

 - whether that be the IFBB judging critera, that sucky and ND have provided and owned you on countless times

-stating how you are a more credible and knowledgable source than peter mcgough, kevin horton, etc.

-whenever a quote is posted about dorian, you claim how you "really" know what the person was saying, in ronnie's own words (lol).

the list goes on and on - which i've done before

as coleman goes furthre and further into palumboism, you have gotten just as bitter.

an yes, i stil think dorian's best (93 or 95) would be ronnie's best of 01 AC.  (that is according to ronnie himself, not your motherfucking, bitter,ass).  

at 245 lbs, he just wouldnt be big enough for a 260 lbs. yates.

save the pictures or ronnie standing next to cormier, titus, james, or whoever else at the 01 AC - they aint 260 and they aint dorian.  

[IceCold]

still waiting for shots of dorian's calves that show more detail than those of Ronnie 99.

people are quick to dismiss the comment, without realizing that it is actually true.

i'm still waiting for you to prove from ANY credible source than ronnie from 99 is the best ever?

nothing from 99 -2007 has ever been printed on 99.

nothing.

[IceCold]

still waiting for shots of dorian's calves that show more detail than those of Ronnie 99.

people are quick to dismiss the comment, without realizing that it is actually true.

many people have had more detailed calves than ronnie or dorian.

but, are they better?

no, so who gives a shit.

extremely pathetic that this is what you resotring too- ronnie's calves on an adjusted pic to make the shadows, striations, etc. enhanced.

why is the background pitch black?

[IceCold]

ronnie never looked this good.....


(hulkster, notice how this IS not a most muscular pose, where ronnie's arms hide his gyno,abs, and his bad structure and imbalance are hidden)

[Hulkster]

many people have had more detailed calves than ronnie or dorian.

but, are they better?

no, so who gives a shit.

extremely pathetic that this is what you resotring too- ronnie's calves on an adjusted pic to make the shadows, striations, etc. enhanced.

why is the background pitch black?

LOL the dumbest poster on getbig is back to going on about "adjusted" pics again..LOL

[Hulkster]

ronnie never looked this good.....


(hulkster, notice how this IS not a most muscular pose, where ronnie's arms hide his gyno,abs, and his bad structure and imbalance are hidden)

LOL this pose hides nothing and shows everything better that ronnie has over dorian. which is almost everything, calves not withstanding.

[IceCold]

LOL the dumbest poster on getbig is back to going on about "adjusted" pics again..LOL

many people have asked you about the pics and like a pussy, you still wont answer.

i own you in virtually every post and every point you try to make.

just like when you stated you knew more than mcgough,

or the thread i started saying how you think ronnie has better legs than platz and the entire board laughed at you.


hahaha.

[IceCold]

LOL this pose hides nothing and shows everything better that ronnie has over dorian. which is almost everything, calves not withstanding.

which is what?

better shape and vascularity.

that's about it.

not to mention the nasty space in between the abs, which is the first thing people see.

[IceCold]

LOL the dumbest poster on getbig is back to going on about "adjusted" pics again..LOL

how about posting the pic of 99 where ronnie is different in every one of them.



lol.

[IceCold]

i'm still waiting for you to prove from ANY credible source than ronnie from 99 is the best ever?

nothing from 99 -2007 has ever been printed on 99.

nothing.

hulkster, what are you waiting for?

another year or 1500 pages?