learn to read, son. I never said I know more about bodybuilding b/c I'm a personal trainer. 
Oh, yes you did. You claimed your credential somehow translate into grater knowledge of how contests are judged, which is utter crap.
I'm going to borrow one of your fav. responses.... argument ad populum. I don't care if Dorian's conditioning is "legendary" b/c it was accepted by the majority of the bodybuilding community. I can see with my own eyes that Dorian wasn't as dry and shredded as 01 ASC Ronnie.
An absurd claim devoid os logic or evidence. The only "eividence" you have used to support this contention is that Ronnie has more separations and striations, which is a ridiculous criteria to try to establish "dryness" because separations are partly genetic. Dorian's marble look is a better indicator of dryness than Ronnie's soft separated muscles.

b/c conditioning was one of Dorian's few strengths. Of course it will garner more attention for him - there wasn't much else to talk about. Ronnie has more strengths which stand out equally, if not more, than Dorian. Notice most of the comments about Ronnie focus on his size? Does that mean Dorian wasn't big either? No.
We have already been over this hundreds of pages ago. Dorian's conditioning was outstanding
when compared to other bodybuilders. It was not only great for him. He was regarded as the standard for conditioning, you moron. Here is what McGough had to say - pay attention to the underlined part:
"No bodybuilder has ever been as hard and dry as the man who won six Sandows." What do you think this means? Answer: that Dorian's conditioning was much better than everyone else's.

SemenHole, I can expect this from you since you say things such as that oiling up and getting under lights makes you look worse than with no oil on and without theatre light, so...

SUCKMYMUSCLE