what about all the pro ronnie quotes? do they mean nothing, since there are equal amounts of pro quotes on either side, how can they be used as arguments. when the pics are a much better comparison. barely anyone agrees with you, the polls are against you, the majority of people on this forum etc etc.. your delusional.
There is a difference between the quotes my specifically state Dorian has better conditioning than Ronnie , yet none of the ' pro Ronnie ' quotes say the same , and ironically all the quotes I posted contradict what your majority claims , well so much for the majority opinion . and Hulkster tried this argumen , its called the argument ad populum , he thinks much like you that if a bunch of people all believe the same thing they must be right thats weak logic , popular opinion doesn't make it true , just popular
Now follow me if you can Dorian would beat Ronnie because depending on the year because he meets the judging criteria better
The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition. lets compare Dorian at 269 pounds to say Ronnie 2001 Arnold Classic
Now Dorian carries more muscular bulk 269 pounds vs 245 pounds - advantage Dorian
Dorian has better conditioning & density than Ronnie - to quote Peter McGough
specificto this argument " Ronnie was never as dry or as hard as Dorian " - advantage Dorian
Dorian has better muscular balance than Ronnie - advantage Dorian
Dorian is a better technical poser than Ronnie - advantage Dorian
and this is exactly why Dorian would beat Ronnie in a contest and thats how its done .