First, Dorian at 257 lbs is not the same size as Ronnie at 257 lbs. Ronnie is bigger at the same weight. Second, Ronnie at the 03 Mr. Olympia was almost 30 lbs heavier than Dorian. He would make Dorian look small.
You are delusional. Dorian carrries less extramuscular and intramuscular water at 257 lbs than Ronnie; he is bigger than Ronnie. He carries more lean muscle mass. The fact that you even have the nerve to make this clim goes to show your dishonesty.
As for Ronnie 2003, most oft he weight advantage was fat, water and quadriceps. I choose Dorian off-season at 287 lbs to nullify the size advantage of Ronnie. He would be just as big, and still harder.
show me pics of this 287 lbs Dorian you speak of. I'm willing to match contest pics of Ronnie to an off-season Dorian any day. Ronnie had separations and striations from head to toe without losing any fullness.
I don't need a pic. Dorian had a visible six-pack and christmas-tree at 305 lbs off-season, so I can deduce that he was even more conditioned at 18 lbs less bodyweight. And separations and striations? So what? Ronnie defeats Dorian at that when they're both 257 lbs, and yet Dorian at 257 lbs is deemed as having better conditioning than Ronnie. Dorian at 287 lbs would have superior hardness than Ronnie at 287 lbs, and the difference in separations and striations bewtween the two at that weightr would be analogous to the difference in separations and striatiosn between them when they are both at 257 lbs.
f you go with 95 Dorian, then Ronnie has the advantage in symmetry and balance. Proportion can go either way.
Dorian 1995 has defeats Ronnie 1999 decisively. Only Ronnie 2003 could give him some trouble, and in tha tcase I choose off-season Dorian to face him.
SUCKMYMUSCLE